Transforming the oncology data paradigm by creating, capturing, and retrieving structured cancer data at the point of care: A Mayo Clinic pilot.

INTRODUCTION: Structured data capture requires defined languages such as minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE). This pilot assessed the feasibility of capturing 5 mCODE categories (stage, disease status, performance status (PS), intent of therapy and intent to change therapy). METHODS: A tool (SmartPhrase) using existing and custom structured data elements was Built to capture 4 data categories (disease status, PS, intent of therapy and intent to change therapy) typically documented as free-text within notes. Existing functionality for stage was supported by the Build. Participant survey data, presence of data (per encounter), and time in chart were collected prior to go-live and repeat timepoints. The anticipated outcome was capture of >50% sustained over time without undue burden. RESULTS: Pre-intervention (5-weeks before go-live), participants had 1390 encounters (1207 patients). The median percent capture across all participants was 32% for stage; no structured data was available for other categories pre-intervention. During a 6-month pilot with 14 participants across three sites, 4995 encounters (3071 patients) occurred. The median percent capture across all participants and all post-intervention months increased to 64% for stage and 81%-82% for the other data categories post-intervention. No increase in participant time in chart was noted. Participants reported that data were meaningful to capture. CONCLUSIONS: Structured data can be captured (1) in real-time, (2) sustained over time without (3) undue provider burden using note-based tools. Our system is expanding the pilot, with integration of these data into clinical decision support, practice dashboards and potential for clinical trial matching.

Real-World Outcomes With Lurbinectedin in Second-Line Setting and Beyond for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lurbinectedin has emerged as a potential treatment option for relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). While clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy and safety, real-world data are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lurbinectedin in a real-world setting, focusing on its use as a second-line agent and beyond in SCLC patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 90 patients who received lurbinectedin between June 2020 and June 2022 within the Mayo Clinic Health System. Of these, 50 patients received lurbinectedin as a second-line agent, and 14 patients received it as a third-line or later agent. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: Lurbinectedin was generally well tolerated in this real-world cohort, with a median OS of 5.1 months in the second-line cohort and 5.6 months in the third-line or later cohort. Median PFS was 2.1 months in the second-line cohort and 3.4 months in the third-line or later cohort. Adverse events were manageable, with the most common being neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, and febrile neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths or grade 5 toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: This real-world study provides valuable insights into the safety and efficacy of lurbinectedin in relapsed SCLC. Lurbinectedin demonstrated modest efficacy and a comparable safety profile to that observed in clinical trials. However, outcomes for relapsed SCLC remain suboptimal, particularly for patients with a shorter chemotherapy-free interval and central nervous system metastases.

Triple M Syndrome: Implications for Hematology-Oncology Advanced Practice Providers.

During the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment. ICI-related side effects occur via direct overactivation of the immune system, and patients can experience sym.

Time from immune checkpoint inhibitor to sotorasib use correlates with risk of hepatotoxicity in non-small cell lung cancer: A brief report.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the risk factors and outcomes for patients who experienced hepatotoxicity after use of sotorasib in KRAS G12C mutated NSCLC. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of patients with KRAS G12C mutated NSCLC who received sotorasib between May 28th, 2021, and December 31st, 2021 across all Mayo Clinic sites, with follow up until December 31st, 2022. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients received sotorasib as standard of care treatment. Grade 3 or higher hepatoxicity was seen in 32% (10/31) patients presenting at a median of 51 days (range, 27-123) of sotorasib initiation. Baseline demographics were comparable between patients with and without ≥grade 3 hepatotoxicity, except for presence of CNS metastases and time from prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. Improvement in liver tests was observed in all patients after stopping sotorasib, and it was restarted at a lower dose in 8 patients. Despite dose reduction, hepatotoxicity requiring sotorasib discontinuation occurred in 2 patients. Twenty-eight of 31 patients had received prior ICI. Median time from prior ICI therapy was 69 days (range, 4-542). Rates of ≥grade 3 hepatoxicity were 75% (3/4), 64% (7/11) and 0% (0/13) for patients who received ICI within 30 days, 31-90 days and >90 days. None of the 3 patients without prior ICI exposure developed hepatoxicity. The median PFS and OS were 3.9 months and 9.9 months respectively. CONCLUSION: One-third of patients developed grade 3 or higher sotorasib induced hepatotoxicity. Risk of hepatotoxicity was higher in patients who received sotorasib within 90 days of ICI treatment.

Dosimetric predictors of pneumonitis in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiation followed by durvalumab.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence and predictors of pneumonitis for patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the era of consolidation durvalumab have yet to be fully elucidated. In this large single institution analysis, we report the incidence of and factors associated with grade 2 + pneumonitis in NSCLC patients treated with the PACIFIC regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all patients treated at our institution with definitive CRT followed by durvalumab from 2018 to 2021. Clinical documentation and imaging studies were reviewed to determine grade 2 + pneumonitis events, which required the following: 1) pulmonary symptoms warranting prolonged steroid taper, oxygen dependence, and/or hospital admission and 2) radiographic findings consistent with pneumonitis. RESULTS: One-hundred ninety patients were included. The majority received 60 Gray (Gy) in 30 fractions with concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel. Median number of durvalumab cycles received was 12 (IQR: 4-22). At a median follow-up of 14.8 months, 50 (26.3%) patients experienced grade 2 + pneumonitis with a 1-year cumulative incidence of 27.8% (95% CI: 21.9-35.4). Seventeen (8.9%) patients experienced grade 3 + pneumonitis and 4 grade 5 (2.1%). Dosimetric predictors of pneumonitis included ipsilateral and total lung volume receiving 5 Gy or greater (V5Gy), V10Gy, V20Gy, V40Gy, and mean dose and contralateral V40Gy. Heart V5Gy, V10Gy, and mean dose were also significant variables. Overall survival estimates at 1 and 3 years were 87.4% (95% CI: 82.4-92.8) and 60.3% (95% CI: 47.9-74.4), respectively. CONCLUSION: We report a risk of pneumonitis higher than that seen on RTOG 0617 and comparable to the PACIFIC study. Multiple lung and heart dosimetric factors were predictive of pneumonitis.

A qualitative study of healthcare-related experiences of non-smoking women with lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Lung cancer in non-smoking women is a distinct entity, but few studies have examined these patients' healthcare-related experiences. METHODS: Women with lung cancer and with no smoking history underwent a face-to-face semi-structured, audio-recorded interview that was analyzed with a qualitative inductive approach. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were interviewed, and three themes emerged. The first theme centered on a delay in cancer diagnosis. One patient described, "The whole initial diagnostic process just fills me with rage… I didn't actually get my Tarceva® until the last week in April." Second, the diagnosis of lung cancer seemed especially challenging in view of patients' non-smoking history and otherwise good health; these factors seem to have contributed to the diagnostic delay. One patient explained, "Well, I was just so adamant that I didn't like smoking… maybe if I had been a smoker, they [the healthcare providers] would've been more resourceful." Finally, the stigma of a smoking-induced malignancy was clearly articulated, "Yeah. Because it's a stigma, and I had read that, too -- people go, 'Well, it's your own damn fault because you were a smoker.'" CONCLUSIONS: Non-smoking women with lung cancer appear to endure a long trajectory from symptoms to cancer diagnosis to the initiation of cancer therapy. An awareness and acknowledgement of this long trajectory might help healthcare providers render more compassionate cancer care to these patients.

The Need to Prioritize and Re-prioritize Palliative Care Options: Smoking Cessation as a Case-in-Point.

OPINION STATEMENT: Palliative care in cancer patients requires a continuous reprioritization of effort. This review describes the need for this reprioritization and uses smoking cessation as a case-in-point. The treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer has changed dramatically in the past few years. Interestingly, patients who had previously smoked now have an improved prognosis-for a variety of reasons. This review discusses this last observation in detail and raises the question of how forcefully we should advise smoking cessation in patients with incurable metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.