Cost-benefit ratio of modern medical education using micro-costing: a model calculation using the example of an innovative breast brachytherapy workshop.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiation oncology is an essential component of therapeutic oncology and necessitates well-trained personnel. Multicatheter brachytherapy (MCBT) is one radiotherapeutic option for early-stage breast cancer treatment. However, specialized hands-on training for MCBT is not currently included in the curriculum for residents. A recently developed hands-on brachytherapy workshop has demonstrated promising results in enhancing knowledge and practical skills. Nevertheless, these simulation-based teaching formats necessitate more time and financial resources. Our analyses include computational models for the implementation and delivery of this workshop and can serve as a basis for similar educational initiatives. METHODS: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a previously developed and evaluated breast brachytherapy simulation workshop. Using a micro-costing approach, we estimated costs at a detailed level by considering supplies, soft- and hardware, and personnel time for each task. This method also allows for a comprehensive evaluation of the costs associated with implementing new medical techniques. The workshop costs were divided into two categories: development and workshop execution. The cost analysis was conducted on a per-participant basis, and the impact on knowledge improvement was measured using a questionnaire. RESULTS: The total workshop costs were determined by considering the initial workshop setup expenses including the development and conceptualization of the course with all involved collaborators, as well as the costs incurred for each individual course. The workshop was found to be financially efficient, with a per-participant cost of €â€¯39, considering the industrial sponsorship provided for brachytherapy equipment. In addition, we assessed the workshop's efficacy by analyzing participant feedback using Likert scale evaluations. The findings indicated a notable enhancement in both theoretical and practical skills among the participants. Moreover, the cost-to-benefit ratio (CBFR) analysis demonstrated a CBFR of €â€¯13.53 for each Likert point increment. CONCLUSION: The hands-on brachytherapy workshop proved to be a valuable and approximately cost-effective educational program, leading to a significant enhancement in the knowledge and skills of the participants. Without the support of industrial sponsorship, the costs would have been unattainable.

Development, implementation, and results of a simulation-based hands-on brachytherapy workshop for medical students.

PURPOSE: The new Medical Licensing Regulations 2025 (Ärztliche Approbationsordnung, ÄApprO) require the development of competence-oriented teaching formats. In addition, there is a great need for high-quality teaching in the field of radiation oncology, which manifests itself already during medical school. For this reason, we developed a simulation-based, hands-on medical education format to teach competency in performing accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy for early breast cancer. In addition, we designed realistic breast models suitable for teaching both palpation of the female breast and implantation of brachytherapy catheters. METHODS: From June 2021 to July 2022, 70 medical students took part in the hands-on brachytherapy workshop. After a propaedeutic introduction, the participants simulated the implantation of single-lead catheters under supervision using the silicone-based breast models. Correct catheter placement was subsequently assessed by CT scans. Participants rated their skills before and after the workshop on a six-point Likert scale in a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Participants significantly improved their knowledge-based and practical skills on APBI in all items as assessed by a standardized questionnaire (mean sum score 42.4 before and 16.0 after the course, p < 0.001). The majority of respondents fully agreed that the workshop increased their interest in brachytherapy (mean 1.15, standard deviation [SD] 0.40 on the six-point Likert scale). The silicone-based breast model was found to be suitable for achieving the previously defined learning objectives (1.19, SD 0.47). The learning atmosphere and didactic quality were rated particularly well (mean 1.07, SD 0.26 and 1.13, SD 0.3 on the six-point Likert scale). CONCLUSION: The simulation-based medical education course for multicatheter brachytherapy can improve self-assessed technical competence. Residency programs should provide resources for this essential component of radiation oncology. This course is exemplary for the development of innovative practical and competence-based teaching formats to meet the current reforms in medical education.

Low doses to the heart in daily practice for treating left-sided breast cancer using accelerated partial-breast irradiation by multicatheter brachytherapy and deep-inspiration breath-hold using a SIB.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the heart dose for left-sided breast cancer that can be achieved during daily practice in patients treated with multicatheter brachytherapy (MCBT) accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) and deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) whole-breast irradiation (WBI) using a simultaneous integrated tumor bed boost (SIB)-two different concepts which nonetheless share some patient overlap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the nominal average dose (Dmean) to the heart as well as the biologically effective dose (BED) and the equivalent dose in 2­Gy fractions (EQD2) for an α/ß of 3 in 30 MCBT-APBI patients and 22 patients treated with DIBH plus SIB. For further dosimetric comparison, we contoured the breast planning target volume (PTV) in each of the brachytherapy planning CTs according to the ESTRO guidelines and computed tangential field plans. Mean dose (Dmean), EQD2 Dmean, and BED Dmean for three dosing schemes were calculated: 50 Gy/25 fractions and two hypofractionated regimens, i.e., 40.05 Gy/15 fractions and 26 Gy/5 fractions. Furthermore, we calculated tangential field plans without a boost for the 22 cases treated with SIB with the standard dosing scheme of 40.05 Gy/15 fractions. RESULTS: MCBT and DIBH radiation therapy both show low-dose exposure of the heart. As expected, hypofractionation leads to sparing of the heart dose. Although MCBT plans were not optimized regarding dose to the heart, Dmean differed significantly between MCBT and DIBH (1.28 Gy vs. 1.91 Gy, p < 0.001) in favor of MCBT, even if the Dmean in each group was very low. In MCBT radiation, the PTV-heart distance is significantly associated with the dose to the heart (p < 0.001), but it is not in DIBH radiotherapy using SIB. CONCLUSION: In daily practice, both DIBH radiation therapy as well as MCBT show a very low heart exposure and may thus reduce long term cardiac morbidity as compared to currently available long-term clinical data of patients treated with conventional tangential field plans in free breathing. Our analysis confirms particularly good cardiac sparing with MCBT-APBI, so that this technique should be offered to patients with left-sided breast cancer if the tumor-associated eligibility criteria are fulfilled.

A multi-institutional initiative on patient-related quality assurance: Independent computational dose verification of fluence-modulated treatment techniques.

PURPOSE: This multi-institutional study investigates whether computational verification of fluence-modulated treatment plans using independent software with its own Strahlerkopfmodel is an appropriate method for patient-related quality assurance (PRQA) in the context of various combinations of linear accelerators (linacs), treatment techniques and treatment planning systems (TPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PRQA-software's (Mobius3D) recalculations of 9 institutions' treatment plans were analyzed for a horseshoe-shaped planning target volume (PTV) inside a phantom. The recomputed dose distributions were compared to a) the dose distributions as calculated by all TPS's and b) the measured dose distributions, which were acquired using the same independent measuring system for all institutions. Furthermore, dose volume histograms were examined. The penumbra deviations and mean gamma values were quantified using Verisoft (PTW). Additionally, workflow requirements for computational verification were discussed. RESULTS: Mobius3D is compatible with all examined TPSs, treatment techniques and linacs. The mean PTV dose differences (Mobius3D-TPS, <3.0%) and 3D gamma passing rates (>95.0%) led to a positive plan acceptance result in all cases. These results are similar to the outcome of the dosimetric measurements with one exception. The mean gamma values (<0.5) show a good agreement between Mobius3D and the TPS dose distributions. CONCLUSION: Using Mobius3D was proven to be an appropriate computational PRQA method for the tested combinations of linacs, treatment techniques and TPS's. The clinical use of Mobius3D has to be complemented with regular dosimetric measurements and thorough linac and TPS QA. Mobius3D's computational verification reduced measurement effort and personnel needs in comparison to dosimetric verifications.

Experimental and Monte Carlo-based determination of the beam quality specifier for TomoTherapyHD treatment units.

Reference dosimetry by means of clinical linear accelerators in high-energy photon fields requires the determination of the beam quality specifier TPR20,10, which characterizes the relative particle flux density of the photon beam. The measurement of TPR20,10 has to be performed in homogenous photon beams of size 10×10cm2 with a focus-detector distance of 100cm. These requirements cannot be fulfilled by TomoTherapy treatment units from Accuray. The TomoTherapy unit provides a flattening-filter-free photon fan beam with a maximum field width of 40cm and field lengths of 1.0cm, 2.5cm and 5.0cm at a focus-isocenter distance of 85cm. For the determination of the beam quality specifier from measurements under nonstandard reference conditions Sauer and Palmans proposed experiment-based fit functions. Moreover, Sauer recommends considering the impact of the flattening-filter-free beam on the measured data. To verify these fit functions, in the present study a Monte Carlo based model of the treatment head of a TomoTherapyHD unit was designed and commissioned with existing beam data of our clinical TomoTherapy machine. Depth dose curves and dose profiles were in agreement within 1.5% between experimental and Monte Carlo-based data. Based on the fit functions from Sauer and Palmans the beam quality specifier TPR20,10 was determined from field sizes 5×5cm2, 10×5cm2, 20×5cm2 and 40×5cm2 based on dosimetric measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. The mean value from all experimental values of TPR20,10 resulted in TPR20,10¯=0.635±0.4%. The impact of the non-homogenous field due to the flattening-filter-free beam was negligible for field sizes below 20×5cm2. The beam quality specifier calculated by Monte Carlo simulations was TPR20,10=0.628 and TPR20,10=0.631 for two different calculation methods. The stopping power ratio water-to-air sw,aΔ directly depends on the beam quality specifier. The value determined from all experimental TPR20,10 data was sw,aΔ=1.126±0.1%, which is in excellent agreement with the value directly calculated by Monte Carlo simulations. The agreement is a good indication that the equations proposed by Sauer and Palmans are able to calculate the beam quality specifier under reference conditions from measurements in arbitrary photon field sizes with high accuracy and are applicable for the TomoTherapyHD treatment unit.

Patient-related quality assurance with different combinations of treatment planning systems, techniques, and machines : A multi-institutional survey.

PURPOSE: This project compares the different patient-related quality assurance systems for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques currently used in the central Germany area with an independent measuring system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The participating institutions generated 21 treatment plans with different combinations of treatment planning systems (TPS) and linear accelerators (LINAC) for the QUASIMODO (Quality ASsurance of Intensity MODulated radiation Oncology) patient model. The plans were exposed to the ArcCHECK measuring system (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL, USA). The dose distributions were analyzed using the corresponding software and a point dose measured at the isocenter with an ionization chamber. RESULTS: According to the generally used criteria of a 10 % threshold, 3 % difference, and 3 mm distance, the majority of plans investigated showed a gamma index exceeding 95 %. Only one plan did not fulfill the criteria and three of the plans did not comply with the commonly accepted tolerance level of ±3 % in point dose measurement. CONCLUSION: Using only one of the two examined methods for patient-related quality assurance is not sufficiently significant in all cases.

Prostate cancer treated with image-guided helical TomoTherapy® and image-guided LINAC-IMRT : Correlation between high-dose bladder volume, margin reduction, and genitourinary toxicity.

BACKGROUND: We compared different image-guidance (IG) strategies for prostate cancer with high-precision IG intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using TomoTherapy® (Accuray Inc., Madison, WI, USA) and linear accelerator (LINAC)-IMRT and their impact on planning target volume (PTV) margin reduction. Follow-up data showed reduced bladder toxicity in TomoTherapy patients compared to LINAC-IMRT. The purpose of this study was to quantify whether the treatment delivery technique and decreased margins affect reductions in bladder toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Setup corrections from 30 patients treated with helical TomoTherapy and 30 treated with a LINAC were analyzed. These data were used to simulate three IG protocols based on setup error correction and a limited number of imaging sessions. For all patients, gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was documented and correlated with the treatment delivery technique. RESULTS: For fiducial marker (FM)-based RT, a margin reduction of up to 3.1, 3.0, and 4.8 mm in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, respectively, could be achieved with calculation of a setup correction from the first three fractions and IG every second day. Although the bladder volume was treated with mean doses of 35 Gy in the TomoTherapy group vs. 22 Gy in the LINAC group, we observed less GU toxicity after TomoTherapy. CONCLUSION: Intraprostate FMs allow for small safety margins, help decrease imaging frequency after setup correction, and minimize the dose to bladder and rectum, resulting in lower GU toxicity. In addition, IMRT delivered with TomoTherapy helps to avoid hotspots in the bladder neck, a critical anatomic structure associated with post-RT urinary toxicity.

Experimental determination of peripheral photon dose components for different IMRT techniques and linear accelerators.

PURPOSE: To quantify the relative peripheral photon doses (PD) to healthy tissues outside the treated region for different IMRT technologies and linac head designs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Measurements were performed on an Elekta linac for various energies (6 MV, 10 MV, 25 MV) at different depths at a distance of 29 cm off-axis (vertical measurements) and different distances from the field edge at constant depth of 10 cm (horizontal measurements). These measurements were compared with results obtained on a Siemens linac at 6 MV and 15 MV. TLD-700 detectors were used to quantify the PDs relative to the dose in the volume exposed with the primary beam. Intensity modulated (IM)-beams with identical fluence patterns were generated with a segmental multileaf (sMLC) technique and with lead-containing cerrobend compensators (MCP96). PD values of IM beams were compared with open beam values. All measurement results of the two different linacs, the different IM methods and the different energies were normalized to the same mean dose. RESULTS: PD values were distinctly higher near the surface (0.5-20 mm) than at larger depth and showed the same trend for all photon beam energies. In comparison with the open field, the photon dose component of PD for IM beams delivered with a segmental MLC technique were increased by a factor varying from 1.2 to 1.8, depending on photon energy and depth. This ratio was around 2 for compensator based IMRT. Depending on depth and distance from the field edge the PD on the Siemens machine was about 30% to 50% higher than on the Elekta machine for the same nominal photon energy. CONCLUSION: The treatment head design of a linac has a large impact on PD in IMRT as well as for open beams. PD can be minimized by proper selection of treatment delivery method and photon beam energy.

Experimental determination of peripheral doses for different IMRT techniques delivered by a Siemens linear accelerator.

PURPOSE: To quantify the relative peripheral doses (PD) to healthy tissues outside the treated region for different intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On a linear accelerator (linac) Oncor Impression (Siemens OCS) with two photon energies (6 MV, 15 MV), point dose measurements were performed at different depths in a solid phantom at 29 cm off-axis distance inplane. PD associated with artificial fluence distributions were compared with open beam contributions, where intensity-modulated (IM) beams were generated by segmented multileaf-modulated (sMLM) IMRT, by tin+wax compensators (TWComp), and by lead-containing cerrobend compensators (CComp). The field size of the open field and the maximum area (isocenter distance) exposed with the primary beam for the IMRT fields was 20 x 22 cm2. Measurements were performed with two kinds of thermoluminescence dosimeters to quantify photon and neutron components separately. Furthermore, experiments were done with and without phantom material in the direct beam to separate different scatter dose components. RESULTS: The results for the photon components and the neutron components are reverse. For the open field, the photon components increase with decreasing photon energy. In comparison with the open field, the photon components are further (factor 1.2-1.8 depending on energy and depth) increased when delivering IMRT with sMLM. When using CComp or TWComp, this factor is even higher and reaches a maximum of 2.4. At depths beyond 20 mm, photon component values slightly decrease with increasing photon energy for all types of IMRT techniques. Near the surface (10 mm depth), photon component values are distinctly higher than those at larger depth, and they increase with increasing photon energy. As expected, neutron components could be detected only for 15 MV. For sMLM and compensators, neutron components increased by factors 4 and 1.5 relative to the open field. The experiments with different scatter conditions show that about 50-70% of the photon components and all neutron components NPD are caused by radiation emanating from the linac head. CONCLUSION: PD in IMRT can be minimized by proper selection of treatment delivery method and photon beam energy. When selecting the IMRT technique in centers where compensator IMRT and MLC IMRT is available, PD burden should be taken into account. The large amount of photon components and neutron components caused by leakage radiation from the treatment head leads to the recommendation that radiation protection aspects for patients undergoing IMRT should be considered in linac design. For further clarification, additional experiments have to be carried out on other types of linacs.

[Radiophysical characteristics of different detectors for use in dosimetry]. / Strahlenphysikalische Einflussgrössen bei der Dosimetrie mit verschiedenen Detektortypen.

The present study investigated the radiophysical influences on the measurement of dosimetry basic data, attributable to field size, photon energy and detector type. A natural diamond detector, two ionisation chambers, different Si-diodes and a EBT-Gafchromic film were studied for this purpose. The characteristics of the detectors were investigated with regard to the measurement of output factors, lateral beam profiles and relative depth-dose curves for narrow and wide photon beams of 15 MV Significant differences in output factors were obtained with different detectors. For narrow fields, the natural diamond detector and the diodes PTW-60012 and SCX_WH-PFD measured output factors close to those of the EBT-Gafchromic film. The output facto rfor large fields was overestimated by the unshielded diode PTW 60012 and the PinPoint-chamber PTW-31006 because of their over-response to scattered photons. The relative depth dose distributions for wide beams at large depths agree well for the diamond, the ionisation chambers and the shielded Diode SCX_ WH-PFD and PTW-60008, while the measured dose was overestimated by an unshielded diode PTW-60012. Considering the influence due to the sensitive materials and the construction of the detectors the manufacturers of dosimeters have specified the application ranges for the various types of detectors.

IMRT with compensators for head-and-neck cancers treatment technique, dosimetric accuracy, and practical experiences.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: With three-dimensional conformal intensity-modulated radiotherapy (3D-c-IMRT) a heterogeneous dose distribution can be achieved in both planning treatment volume and in adjacent normal tissues and organs to be spared. 3D-c-IMRT demands for modified photon fluence profiles which can be accomplished with different techniques. This report deals with the commissioning of metal compensators and the first experiences in clinical use. Dosimetric accuracy, dose coverage and practical experience like treatment delivery time, monitor units and dose outside the treated volume are evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2002 to April 2004, 24 patients with head-and-neck cancers were treated with 3D-c-IMRT using tin-wax compensators. The dose prescription included a simultaneously integrated boost (SIB). High-dose volume was irradiated with 60-70 Gy (median 66 Gy), low-dose volume with 48-54 Gy (median 52 Gy) administered by a standardized seven- portal coplanar beam arrangement. Dose at one parotid gland was aimed at 26 Gy. The compensators used consisted of tin granules embedded in wax; recalculation was performed with compensators made of the alloy MCP96 as well. RESULTS: In 21 of 24 patients 3D-c-IMRT with tin-wax compensators reduced the median dose to one parotid gland to < 30 Gy. Recalculation with compensators with higher density which allowed higher attenuation revealed better protection of the parotid gland. The treatment delivery time per fraction was between 6 and 12 min (plus time for patient positioning), approximately 300 MU per 2 Gy were applied. The dose outside the treated volume was increased with regard to open fields and comparable with a physical wedge of 15-30 degrees . Quality assurance and treatment of patient were fast and simple. It was shown, that calculated dose distribution corresponded to measured dose distribution with high accuracy. CONCLUSION: The described method offers facilities for a good dose coverage of irregular target volumes with different prescribed doses and a considerable dose reduction in adjacent organs at risk. The dose sparing of organs at risk can be further improved, if a compensator material with higher density is used.

Dosimetric quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiotherapy feasibility study for a filmless approach.

PURPOSE: Test and comparison of various 2-D real-time detectors for dosimetric quality assurance (QA) of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with the vision to replace radiographic films for 2-D dosimetry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All IMRT treatment plans were created with the Konrad software (Siemens OCS). The final dose calculation was also carried out in Konrad. A Mevatron Primus (Siemens OCS) linear accelerator which provides 6-MV and 15-MV highenergy photon beams was used for the delivery of segmented multileaf-modulated IMRT. Three different 2-D detectors, each based on a different physical (interaction) principle, were tested for the field-related IMRT verification: (1) the MapCheck diode system (Sun Nuclear), (2) the I'mRT QA scintillation detector (Scanditronix/Wellhöfer), and the Seven29 ionization chamber array (PTW). The performance of these detector arrays was evaluated against IMRT dose distributions created and calculated with Konrad and the results obtained were compared with film measurements performed with radiographic films (EDR2, Kodak). Additionally, measurements were performed with point detectors, such as diamond, diodes (PTW) and ionization chambers (PTW, Scanditronics/ Wellhöfer) and radiochromic films (GafChromic film MD55, ISP). RESULTS: The results obtained with all three 2-D detector systems were in good agreement with calculations performed with the treatment-planning system and with the standard dosimetric tools, i.e., films or various point dose detectors. It could be shown that all three systems offer dosimetric characteristics required for performing field-related IMRT QA with relative dose measurements. The accuracy of the 2-D detectors was mostly +/- 3% normalized to dose maximum for a wide dynamic range. The maximum deviations did not exceed +/- 5% even in regions with a steep dose gradient. The main differences between the detector systems were the spatial resolution, the maximal field size, and the ability to perform absolute dosimetric measurements. CONCLUSION: Commercial 2-D detectors have the potential to replace films as an "area detector" for field-related verification of IMRT. The on-line information provided by the respective systems can even improve the efficiency of the QA procedures.

[Improvement of the accuracy of the Laplace transform method for the determination of radiotherapy spectra of clinical linear accelerators]. / Erhöhung der Genauigkeit der Laplace-Transformations-methode zur Bestimmung des Bremsstrahlungsspektrums klinischer Linearbeschleuniger.

The present study focused on the reconstruction of the bremsstrahlung spectrum of a clinical linear accelerator from the measured transmission curve, with the aim of improving the accuracy of this method. The essence of the method was the analytic inverse Laplace transform of a parameter function fitted to the measured transmission curve. We tested known fitting functions, however they resulted in considerable fitting inaccuracy, leading to inaccuracies of the bremsstrahlung spectrum. In order to minimise the fitting errors, we employed a linear combination of n equations with 2n-1 parameters. The fitting errors are now considerably smaller. The measurement of the transmission function requires that the energy-dependent detector response is taken into account. We analysed the underlying physical context and developed a function that corrects for the energy-dependent detector response. The factors of this function were experimentally determined or calculated from tabulated values.

VERIDOS: a new tool for quality assurance for intensity modulated radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The use of intensity modulated radiation fields needs an extended quality assurance concept. This consists of a linac related part and a case related part. Case related means the verification of an individual treatment plan, optimized on a CT data set of an individual patient and prepared for the treatment of this patient. This part of the quality assurance work is usually time consuming, delivers only partially quantitative results and is uncomfortable without additional help. It will be shown in this paper how the software VERIDOS will improve the optimization of the case related part of the quality assurance work. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The main function of the software is the quantitative comparison of the calculated dose distribution from the treatment planning software with the measured dose distribution of an irradiated phantom. Several additional functions will be explained. Two self-developed phantoms made of RW3 (solid water) and GAFCHROMIC films or Kodak EDR2 films for the measurement of the dose distributions were used. VERIDOS was tested with the treatment planning systems Helay-TMS and Brainscan. RESULTS: VERIDOS is a suitable tool for the import of calculated dose matrices from the treatment planning systems Helax-TMS and Brainscan and of measured dose matrices exported from the dosimetry software Mephysto (PTW). The import from other treatment planning systems and scanning software applications for film dosimetry is generally possible. In such case the import function has to be adapted to the special header of the import matrix. All other functions of this software tool like normalization (automatically, manually), working with corrections (ground substraction, factors), overlay/comparison of dose distributions, difference matrix, cutting function (profiles) and export functions work reliable. CONCLUSIONS: VERIDOS improves the optimization of the case related part of the quality assurance work for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The diverse functions of the software offer the radiation physicist a wide base to verify the IMRT plan independent from the mode of its delivery (compensator technology or MLC technology).

[Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with compensators]. / Intensitätsmodulierte Strahlentherapie (IMRT) mit Kompensatoren.

The irradiation with intensity-modulated fields is possible with static as well as dynamic methods. In our university hospital, the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with compensators was prepared and used for the first time for patient irradiation in July 2001. The compensators consist of a mixture of tin granulate and wax, which is filled in a milled negative mould. The treatment planning is performed with Helax-TMS (MDS Nordion). An additional software is used for editing the modulation matrix ("Modifix"). Before irradiation of the first patient, extensive measurements have been carried out in terms of quality assurance of treatment planning and production of compensators. The results of the verification measurements have shown that IMRT with compensators possesses high spatial and dosimetric exactness. The calculated dose distributions are applied correctly. The accuracy of the calculated monitor units is normally better than 3%; in small volumes, further dosimetric inaccuracies between calculated and measured dose distributions are mostly less than 3%. Therefore, the compensators contribute to the achievement of high-level IMRT even when apparatuses without MLC are used. This paper describes the use of the IMRT with compensators, presents the limits of this technology, and discusses the first practical experiences.