Interference of confounding factors on the use of (1,3)-beta-D-glucan in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in the intensive care unit.

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are an increasing problem in intensive care units (ICUs), and conventional diagnostic methods are not always reliable or timely enough to deliver appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The dosage of fungal antigens in serum is a promising diagnostic technique, but several confounding factors, such as treatment with immunoglobulins (Ig), albumin, or antifungals, could interfere with the correct interpretation of the (1,3)-beta-D-glucan (BG) assay. This study assessed the reliability of the BG assay and the influence of timing and dosage of major confounding factors on circulating levels of IFI biomarkers. 267 ICU patients who underwent a BG assay were retrospectively studied. The timing and dosage of albumin, use of azole treatment, and infusions of intravenous IgG, red blood cells, concentrated platelets, and frozen plasma were analyzed to find possible correlations with the BG results. The sensitivity and specificity of the BG assay were calculated. The BG test in serum showed high sensitivity (82.9 %) but low specificity (56.7 %). The optimal cut-off for the test was 95.9 pg/mL. The mean BG level in proven invasive candidiasis was around 400 pg/mL. The only factor that was found to significantly confound (p < 0.05) the diagnostic performance of the BG assay was the administration of more than 30 g of albumin within 2 days prior to BG testing. The BG assay remains a useful diagnostic test in ICU patients and the levels of BG are useful in evaluating the positive predictive value of this biomarker. The only confounding factor in our study was the use of albumin.

[Localized neuropathic pain--5% lidocaine medicated patch as a first-line treatment and as add-on therapy: literature review and personal experience]. / Dolore neuropatico localizzato: revisione della letteratura sull'utilizzo de Lidocaina cerotto 5% come first line treatment e nostra esperienza come add-on therapy.

Localized neuropathic pain (LNP) is a type of neuropathic pain characterized by consistent and circumscribed area(s) of maximum pain, which are associated with negative or positive sensory signs and/or spontaneous symptoms typical of neuropathic pain. This description outlines the clinical features of a group of pathologies, in which a LNP can be diagnosed and for whom topical targeted treatment with 5% Lidocaine medicated plaster can be suggested. Indeed both American as well as European guidelines already suggest 5% Lidocaine medicated plaster as a first line treatment in post herpetic neuralgia and in general in the treatment of conditions such as diabetic painful polyneuropathy and post surgical pain where a LNP can be ascertain. In a daily practice of a Pain Unit however the usual case mix encompasses also other causes of LNP, most of them with a scanty pain control in spite of a ongoing polytherapy. Aims of this paper were to focus on 5% Lidocaine medicated plaster as a first line treatment in LNP and to add new insight on its possible use as add-on therapy reporting our data on a consecutive series of 42 patients affected by LNP under unsatisfactory polytherapy in which 5% Lidocaine medicated plaster was able to achieve a satisfactory pain control.

Vaccine allergy evaluation and management at the specialized Green Channel Consultation Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Suspected vaccine allergy may be a cause of incomplete or delayed vaccination. Patients at risk of adverse reactions or suspected contraindications need specialized consultation about subsequent vaccinations. OBJECTIVE: To analyse consultancy results for patients at risk of allergic reactions to vaccines as evaluated by the Green Channel University Hospital Immunization Consultancy Clinic. METHODS: A review of cases of allergic reactions to vaccines or contraindications due to underlying diseases or sensitization to vaccine components submitted to the Green Channel was carried out. Analysed data included detailed clinical reaction history, skin and in vitro allergy testing with vaccine components, recommendations for vaccination and outcome of subsequent vaccine administrations. RESULTS: A total of 519 cases, 370 referred for previous local or systemic reactions to vaccines, mostly cutaneous, and 149 sent for suspected contraindications were evaluated. Skin testing was performed on 152 patients, specific IgE determination in 37 subjects and patch testing in 173 cases. After consultation, 442 (85%) subjects were advised to continue vaccination, with personalized precautions (premedication, or alternative brand, or administration in graded doses) for 200 of them. Among the 352 (80%) patients vaccinated as per Green Channel instructions, 33 subjects (9.3%) reported mild allergic or non-specific symptoms and one (0.3%) urticaria with bronchospasm. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Even though vaccine allergy occurs very rarely, a safe procedure for immunization can be applied, through specialized allergy consultancy, for most subjects with suspected allergy to vaccines, and who could be potentially excluded from vaccination for risk of adverse reactions.

Acute nephrotoxicity of NSAID from the foetus to the adult.

NSAIDs are generally considered to be safe and well tolerated, but, even with the advent of selective COX-2 inhibitors, nephrotoxicity remains a concern. An impaired renal perfusion caused by the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis is claimed like the more frequent cause of an acute renal failure due to NSAIDs, while a chronic interstitial nephritis or an analgesic nephropathy are believed the causes of a chronic renal failure. The real incidence of renal side effects of NSAIDs is still unclear and it differs between the age of the patients and the reports present in the literature. The occurrence of renal side effects following prenatal exposure to NSAIDs seems to be rare considering the large number of pregnant woman treated with indomethacin or other prostaglandin inhibitors. NSAID-related nephrotoxicity remains an important clinical problem in the newborns, in whom the functionally immature kidney may exert a significant effect on the disposition of the drugs. Instead, nephrotoxicity is a rare event in children and the risk is lower than adults. In healthy adult patients the incidence of renal adverse effects is very low, less than 1%. The risk increased with age. The elderly are at higher risk, and it is correlated at the presence of pretreatment renal disease, hypovolemia due to use of diuretics, diabetes, congestive heart failure or alteration of NSAID pharmacokinetics.

The role of neurolytic celiac plexus block in the treatment of pancreatic cancer pain.

Pancreatic carcinoma, an important leading cause of cancer death, has increased steadily in incidence and still has a poor prognosis. Pain is one of the most frequent symptoms, affecting more than 75% of patients. It is often present in the early stages of disease and may be severe and difficult to treat. Abdominal viscera, including pancreas, liver, gallbladder, adrenal, kidney, and the gastrointestinal tract from the level of the gastroesophageal junction to the splenic flexure of the colon are innervated, at least in part, via the celiac plexus. Thus, painful tumors in these viscera may have pain relieved through the use of a neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB). Although some investigators questioned the role and the efficacy of NCPB in the treatment of upper abdominal cancer pain, most of them have suggested that it may represent the optimal treatment, especially for pancreatic cancer pain. In this report we have reviewed the techniques, results, and complications of NCPB for the treatment of pancreatic cancer pain.