Does galvanic vestibular stimulation decrease spasticity in clinically complete spinal cord injury?

The aim of this study was to determine changes in clinical and biomechanical measures of spasticity after administering galvanic vestibular stimulation in patients with a complete spinal cord injury (SCI). The spasticity in the lower limbs was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale and the pendulum test in seven SCI patients (grade A on the ASIA Impairment Scale) before (0), immediately after (0), and at 5 and 30 min after the real versus sham galvanic vestibular stimulation (15 s each, anode over the right mastoid). Overall, the changes in spasticity were not significantly different between the real and sham galvanic vestibular stimulation. However, the Modified Ashworth Scale and the pendulum test indicated a reduction in spasticity in two out of seven patients. The results suggest that galvanic vestibular stimulation may modify spasticity in some patients with complete SCI, presumably through the residual vestibulospinal influences. Future studies should determine clinical and neurophysiological profiles of responders versus nonresponders and optimize parameters of galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Gait training of poststroke patients assisted by the Walkaround (body postural support).

Improvement in gait abilities is one of the important goals of stroke rehabilitation. The Walkaround is a new postural assistance device for gait training, which allows an early start for gait training. This device provides body postural support (BPS) and trunk orientation by means of a lumbar belt that is connected to a powered rolling walker. We conducted a randomized, single-blinded, 4-week clinical trial of 22 subacute stroke patients with a follow-up period of 6 months. Patients were divided into two identically sized groups: the treatment group (BPS), which was assisted by the Walkaround, and the control (CON) group, which was assisted by conventional means (cane, therapist) during gait training. The objective of the study was to assess whether the Walkaround is more effective than conventional assistance during gait training. The outcome measures were as follows: Barthel index, Fugl-Meyer score for the lower extremities, Berg balance test, and gait speed. Changes in the outcome measures were significant for the Berg balance score after 6 months in both groups and in gait speed among the BPS group at the end of therapy and after 6 months (P<0.05) compared with the same outcome measures at the beginning of the trial. Significant differences were found in gait speed and Berg balance test scores after 4 weeks and in gait speed after 6 months (P<0.05) between the BPS and the CON groups. The results suggest that added postural support by the Walkaround led to limited yet significant changes in gait speed and balance control.