A suture-based liver retraction method for laparoscopic bariatric procedures: results from a large case series.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic bariatric surgery requires retraction of the left lobe of the liver to provide adequate operative view and working space. Conventional approaches utilize a mechanical retractor and require additional incision(s), and at times an assistant. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a suture-based method of liver retraction in a large series of patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. This method eliminates the need for a subxiphoid incision for mechanical retraction of the liver. SETTING: Two hospitals in the Midwest with a high volume of laparoscopic bariatric cases. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified all patients undergoing bariatric surgery for whom suture-based liver retraction was selected. The left lobe of the liver is lifted, and sutures are placed across the right crus of the diaphragm and were either anchored on the abdominal wall or intraperitoneally to provide static retraction of the left lobe of the liver. RESULTS: In all, 487 cases were identified. Patients had a high rate of morbid obesity (83% with body mass index >40 kg/m(2)) and diabetes (34.3%). The most common bariatric procedures were Roux-en-Y gastric banding (39%) and sleeve gastrectomy (24.6%). Overall, 6 injuries to the liver were noted, only 2 of which were related to the suture-based retraction technique. Both injuries involved minor bleeding and were successfully managed during the procedure. The mean number of incisions required was 4.6. CONCLUSIONS: Suture-based liver retraction was found to be safe and effective in this large case series of morbidly obese patients. The rate of complications involving the technique was extremely low (.4%).

Management of postsurgical leaks in the bariatric patient.

Postsurgical leaks after bariatric procedures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. They usually arise from anastomotic and staple line failures that are attributed to surgical technique, ischemia, and patient comorbid conditions. Timely diagnosis from subtle clinical clues is the key to appropriate management. Traditional treatment consists of adequate control of the intra-abdominal infection via surgical or percutaneous drainage maneuvers, antibiotics, and nutrition support via parenteral or feeding tube routes. Recently, endoscopically placed covered esophageal stents have been used to exclude the leak site, allowing oral nutrition and speeding healing.

Laparoscopic revisional surgery after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Failure of primary bariatric surgery is frequently due to weight recidivism, intractable gastric reflux, gastrojejunal strictures, fistulas, and malnutrition. Of these patients, 10-60% will undergo reoperative bariatric surgery, depending on the primary procedure performed. Open reoperative approaches for revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) have traditionally been advocated secondary to the perceived difficulty and safety with laparoscopic techniques. Few studies have addressed revisions after RYGB. The aim of the present study was to provide our experience regarding the safety, efficacy, and weight loss results of laparoscopic revisional surgery after previous RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy procedures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery for complications after previous RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy from November 2005 to May 2007 was performed. Technical revisions included isolation and transection of gastrogastric fistulas with partial gastrectomy, sleeve gastrectomy conversion to RYGB, and revision of RYGB. The data collected included the pre- and postoperative body mass index, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients underwent laparoscopic revisional surgery. The primary operations had consisted of RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy. The complications from primary operations included gastrogastric fistulas, refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease, weight recidivism, and gastric outlet obstruction. The mean prerevision body mass index was 42 ± 10 kg/m(2). The average follow-up was 240 days (range 11-476). The average body mass index during follow-up was 37 ± 8 kg/m(2). Laparoscopic revision was successful in all but 1 patient, who required conversion to laparotomy for staple line leak. The average operating room time and estimated blood loss was 131 ± 66 minutes and 70 mL, respectively. The average hospital stay was 6 days. Three patients required surgical exploration for hemorrhage, staple line leak, and an incarcerated hernia. The overall complication rate was 23%, with a major complication rate of 11.5%. No patients died. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery after previous RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy is technically challenging but compared well in safety and efficacy with the results from open revisional procedures. Intraoperative endoscopy is a key component in performing these procedures.

Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement with liver suture retractor.

BACKGROUND: The evolution of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has no doubt been impacted by the decrease or elimination of incisions seen with natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). SILS upholds the principal advantages of minimal access surgery including shortened hospital stays, the potential for decreased postoperative pain, and cosmetically acceptable scars by reducing large or multiple incisions to a relatively small, single one. METHODS: As opposed to NOTES, SILS does not violate a natural orifice and so the potential for contamination is identical to that of laparoscopy. SILS also utilizes familiar technology regarding ports and instruments which make technical adaptation easier and costs remain essentially unchanged. Standard laparoscopic techniques for gastric band placement use up to six ports in various configurations to safely accomplish this procedure. We describe a 40-year-old female with a body mass index of 41 who underwent placement of a gastric band for weight reduction via a single incision. A novel liver retractor technique eliminated one of the typical incisions utilized in other described "single-incision" techniques. RESULTS: The total number of trocars used at the sole, transumbilical incision was three. The operative time was 58 min. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 1. CONCLUSIONS: Single-incision transumbilical placement of gastric band is safe and technically feasible. Evolution of this technique with improved instrumentation will facilitate its adoption.

Management of anastomotic leaks after Roux-en-Y bypass using self-expanding polyester stents.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the outcomes of a series of endoscopically placed polyester self-expanding polyflex stents (SEPSs) for the management of anastomotic leaks after Roux-en-Y bypass. Anastomotic leaks after gastric bypass cause significant morbidity and mortality. Covered polyester SEPSs might have a role in the treatment of these leaks. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed from January 2006 to November 2006 that included all acute and chronic leaks treated with SEPSs. RESULTS: A total of 6 patients were treated with stents, with a mean procedure time of 22 minutes. Of these 6 patients, 5 had acute postoperative leaks and 1 had a chronic fistula. Five patients started oral intake 1-6 days after their procedure. All acute leaks had complete healing at a median of 44 days. The patient with a chronic gastrocutaneous fistula required revisional surgery for fistula closure. In addition, 5 patients had stent migration, and 3 required stent replacement. CONCLUSION: An endoscopically placed SEPS provides a less-invasive alternative to treat acute anastomotic leaks after Roux-en-Y bypass while simultaneously allowing oral intake. The results of this case series have demonstrated this treatment to be safe and effective.

Hemostasis and hemostatic agents in minimally invasive surgery.

As minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has grown in scope and complexity, new challenges have been introduced along the way, including the need for endoscopic hemostatic techniques. Traditional electrical and mechanical means are still the mainstay, but new technologies for hemostasis continue to emerge. Restricted access to the operative site can limit the use of some tools, and yet multiple chemical hemostats and tamponading agents are used in MIS today. Systemic agents also have been developed and have a role in certain MIS circumstances. These products allow surgeons to continue to approach more difficult procedures using minimally invasive techniques. On the horizon are the newer, even less-invasive approaches of natural orifice endoluminal and transluminal surgery, which will increase the difficulties with reliable hemostat agents and delivery mechanisms.