Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: is the promise real?

Recent advances in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) have significantly enhanced its application in ART, providing critical insights into embryo viability, and potentially reducing both the time spent in fertility treatments and the risk of pregnancy loss. With the integration of next-generation sequencing, PGT-A now offers greater diagnostic precision, although challenges related to segmental aneuploidies and mosaicism remain. The emergence of non-invasive PGT-A (niPGT-A), which analyzes DNA in spent embryo culture media, promises a simpler aneuploidy screening method. This mini review assesses the methodological criteria for test validation, the current landscape of PGT-A, and the potential of niPGT-A, while evaluating its advantages and potential pitfalls. It underscores the importance of a robust three-phase validation process to ensure the clinical reliability of PGT-A. Despite initial encouraging data, niPGT-A not only confronts issues of DNA amplification failure and diagnostic inaccuracies but also has yet to meet the three-prong criteria required for appropriate test validation, necessitating further research for its clinical adoption. The review underscores that niPGT-A, like traditional PGT-A, must attain the high standards of precision and reliability expected of any genetic testing platform used in clinical settings before it can be adopted into routine ART protocols.

Maternal genetic variants in kinesin motor domains prematurely increase egg aneuploidy.

The female reproductive lifespan depends on egg quality, particularly euploidy. Mistakes in meiosis leading to egg aneuploidy are common, but the genetic landscape causing this is not well understood due to limited phenotypic data. We identify genetic determinants of reproductive aging via egg aneuploidy using a biobank of maternal exomes linked with maternal age and embryonic aneuploidy data. We found 404 genes with variants enriched in individuals with high egg aneuploidy rates and implicate kinesin protein family genes in aneuploidy risk. Experimental perturbations showed that motor domain variants in these genes increase aneuploidy in mouse oocytes. A knock-in mouse model validated that a specific variant in kinesin KIF18A accelerates reproductive aging and diminishes fertility. These findings suggest potential non-invasive biomarkers for egg quality, aiding personalized fertility medicine. One sentence summary: The study identifies novel genetic determinants of reproductive aging linked to egg aneuploidy by analyzing maternal exomes and demonstrates that variants in kinesin genes, specifically KIF18A , contribute to increased aneuploidy and accelerated reproductive aging, offering potential for personalized fertility medicine.

Effect of intraovarian platelet-rich plasma injection on IVF outcomes in women with poor ovarian response: the PROVA randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection increase the number of mature oocytes obtained after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in young women with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER: Intraovarian PRP injection procedure does not improve mature oocyte yield after COS in women less than 38 years old with an established IVF history of POR. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: POR is frequently encountered among the infertile population and the number of women seeking infertility treatment related to POR is increasing. Effective treatment options for this patient population to conceive with autologous oocytes are lacking. Case series and cohort studies suggest that intraovarian PRP injection may improve follicular recruitment in women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and POR, yet robust randomized studies have not been performed to date to determine the clinical utility of this intervention. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted at university-affiliated reproductive centers in the USA and Turkey, between January 2020 and November 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients who met inclusion criteria (<38 years old, two or more prior cycles with <3 oocytes retrieved; and without single gene disorders, prior ovarian surgery, endometriomas, BMI >35 kg/m2, or severe male factor infertility) were randomized to either the PRP or control group. Patients in both groups subsequently underwent COS, oocyte retrieval, ICSI, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and single euploid embryo transfer. Number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes obtained was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included ovarian reserve tests (antral follicle count [AFC] and anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH]), blastocyst and euploid blastocyst yields, and sustained implantation. The study was powered to detect a difference of one mature oocyte obtained at oocyte retrieval. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 83 patients met inclusion criteria and were randomized to receive autologous intraovarian PRP injection (n = 41) or to no intervention (n = 42). No significant differences were observed in number of MII oocytes retrieved per cycle (2.8 ± 2.4 vs 3.1 ± 3.3 in PRP vs control, respectively; P = 0.9), blastocysts (1.0 ± 1.3 vs 1.3 ± 2.1, P = 0.8), or euploid blastocysts (0.8 ± 1.1 vs 0.9 ± 1.6; P = 0.5). Similarly, no differences were observed in the likelihood of obtaining at least one euploid blastocyst (45% vs 37%, P = 0.4; relative risk [RR], 95% CI = 0.9, 0.6-1.2) or the rate of sustained implantation (31% vs 29%, P = 0.9; RR 1.0, 0.7-1.3). Posttreatment AFC (7.9 ± 4.5 vs 6.8 ± 4.8, P = 0.3) and AMH (0.99 ± 0.98 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.2) were also not different between the groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Results from this RCT may not be generalizable to other PRP preparations owing to heterogeneity and lack of standardization. The control groups did not undergo a sham ovarian injection, which would have been relevant had the results shown benefit of PRP injection. Only patients with POR were included in this study, and these results may not be generalizable to more severe diminution of ovarian reserve, as seen with POI. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The intraovarian PRP injection procedure does not improve mature oocyte yield or other parameters of IVF outcome in women less than 38 years old with an established IVF history of POR. The results from this study do not support the use of intraovarian PRP injection in this population. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Departmental funds were used and no external funding was requested for this study. ES is a consultant for and receives grant funding from the Foundation for Embryonic Competence. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov Registry Identifier: NCT04163640. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 15 November 2019. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 24 February 2020.

Addition of rapamycin or co-culture with cumulus cells from younger reproductive age women does not improve rescue in vitro oocyte maturation or euploidy rates in older reproductive age women.

Both spontaneously conceived pregnancies and those achieved using assisted reproduction decline with advancing maternal age. In this study, we tested if rapamycin and/or cumulus cells (CCs) from young donors could improve oocyte maturation and euploidy rates of germinal vesicle (GV) stage oocytes obtained from older women of reproductive age. A total of 498 GVs from 201 women >38 years (40.6 ± 1.8, mean ± SD) were included. GVs were randomly assigned into five groups for rescue IVM: control (with no CCs and no rapamycin); with autologous CCs; with autologous CCs and rapamycin; with CCs from young women (<35 years); and with CCs from young women and rapamycin. After 24 h of culture, the first polar body (PB) was biopsied in metaphase II oocytes, and the cytogenetic constitution was assessed using next-generation sequencing for both oocytes and PBs. Comparable maturation rates were found (56.2%, 60.0%, 46.5%, 51.7%, and 48.5% for groups 1-5, respectively; P = 0.30). Similarly, comparable euploidy rates were observed in the five groups (41.5%, 37.8%, 47.2%, 43.6%, and 47.8% for Groups 1-5, respectively; P = 0.87). Our findings indicate that rescue IVM is effective for obtaining mature euploid oocytes in older women of reproductive age, and that incubation with rapamycin or CCs obtained from young donors does not improve the maturation or euploidy rate.

Oocyte rescue in-vitro maturation does not adversely affect chromosome segregation during the first meiotic division.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does rescue in-vitro maturation (IVM) in the presence or absence of cumulus cells, affect the progress of meiosis I, compared with oocytes that mature in vivo? DESIGN: This prospective study was conducted in a university-affiliated fertility centre. Ninety-five young oocyte donors (mean age 25.57 ± 4.47) with a normal karyotype and no known fertility problems were included. A total of 390 oocytes (116 mature metaphase II [MII] and 274 immature oocytes) were analysed. The immature oocytes underwent rescue IVM in the presence of cumulus cells (CC; IVM+CC; n = 137) or without them (IVM-CC; n = 137), and IVM rate was calculated. Chromosome copy number analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on all rescue IVM oocytes reaching MII as well as those that were mature at the time of initial denudation (in-vivo-matured oocytes [IVO]). RESULTS: Maturation rates were similar in IVM+CC and IVM-CC oocytes (62.8 versus 71.5%, P = 0.16). Conclusive cytogenetic results were obtained from 65 MII oocytes from the IVM+CC group, 87 from the IVM-CC group, and 99 from the IVO group. Oocyte euploidy rates for the three groups were similar, at 75.4%, 83.9% and 80.8%, respectively (P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that culture of germinal vesicle and metaphase I oocytes in the presence of cumulus cells does not improve rates of IVM. In general, the process of rescue IVM does not appear to alter the frequency of oocytes with a normal chromosome copy number.

Bioaccumulation of Non-Essential Trace Elements Detected in Women's Follicular Fluid, Urine, and Plasma Is Associated with Poor Reproductive Outcomes following Single Euploid Embryo Transfer: A Pilot Study.

This study aims to determine the association of non-essential trace elements present in follicular fluid, plasma, and urine with reproductive outcomes of women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) and single frozen euploid embryo transfer (SET/FET). This single-center, prospective cohort study included sixty women undergoing ICSI with PGT-A and SET/FET between 2018 and 2019. Urine, plasma and follicular fluid samples were collected on the vaginal oocyte retrieval day to simultaneously quantify ten non-essential trace elements (i.e., Ba, Sr, Rb, Sn, Ti, Pb, Cd, Hg, Sb, and As). We found several associations between the levels of these non-essential trace elements and clinical IVF parameters. Specifically, the increased levels of barium in follicular fluid were negatively associated with ovarian function, pre-implantation development and embryo euploidy, while elevated strontium concentrations in this biofluid were negatively associated with impaired blastulation and embryo euploidy. Elevated plasma strontium levels were negatively associated with ovarian function, fertilization and blastulation. Enhanced presence of other trace elements in plasma (i.e., rubidium and arsenic) were associated with a diminished ovarian function and limited the number of recovered oocytes, mature oocytes and zygotes, respectively. Fully adjusted models suggested significantly lower odds of achieving a live birth when increased concentrations of barium and tin were found in urine.

Phytoestrogens Present in Follicular Fluid and Urine Are Positively Associated with IVF Outcomes following Single Euploid Embryo Transfer.

The impact and safety of phytoestrogens, plant-derived isoflavones with estrogenic activity predominantly present in soy, on female reproductive health and IVF outcomes continues to be hotly debated. In this prospective cohort study, 60 women attending IVI-RMA New Jersey undergoing IVF with single frozen embryo transfer (SET/FET) of good-quality euploid blastocyst after PGT-A analysis were recruited. Concentrations of two phytoestrogens (daidzein and genistein) in follicular fluid (FF) and urine (U) were measured by UPLC-MSMS, both collected on vaginal oocyte retrieval day. These measurements correlated with IVF clinical outcomes. In models adjusted for age, BMI, race/ethnicity, and smoking status, higher FF phytoestrogen concentrations were significantly associated with higher serum estradiol, enhanced probability of implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth. Moreover, higher urine phytoestrogen concentrations were significantly associated with improved oocyte maturation and fertilization potential and increased probability of clinical pregnancy and live birth. Finally, higher FF and urine phytoestrogen concentrations were associated with a higher probability of live birth from a given IVF cycle. Our results suggest that dietary phytoestrogens improved reproductive outcomes of women undergoing IVF treatment. However, additional prospective studies are needed to optimize the use of phytoestrogens to further enhance reproductive outcomes and/or protect against reproductive insults.

The Impact of Essential Trace Elements on Ovarian Response and Reproductive Outcomes following Single Euploid Embryo Transfer.

Essential trace elements are required in extremely small amounts and obtained through diet. This research focuses on detecting major trace elements in different biofluids of sixty women undergoing ICSI with PGT-A and SET/FET at IVI-RMA, New Jersey, and assessing their impact on their IVF outcomes. Urine, plasma, and follicular fluid samples were collected on the vaginal oocyte retrieval day to measure the concentrations of eight essential trace elements (copper, zinc, molybdenum, lithium, selenium, manganese, chromium, and iron) using ICP-MS. After analysis, ovarian response and preimplantation outcomes had significant positive associations with both copper alone and the copper/zinc ratio in the follicular fluid and plasma, in addition to plasma manganese. Alternatively, elevated follicular fluid lithium concentrations were significantly associated with poor preimplantation outcomes while the urinary molybdenum concentration was significantly associated with a lower probability of implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth. Urinary lithium and chromium concentrations were significantly associated with a lower probability of achieving a live birth. Our results suggest that the essential trace elements present in follicular fluid, plasma, and urine of women are directly associated with their reproductive outcomes, with copper and manganese exerting positive effects and lithium and molybdenum exerting negative effects.

Recurrent implantation failure: reality or a statistical mirage?: Consensus statement from the July 1, 2022 Lugano Workshop on recurrent implantation failure.

IMPORTANCE: To date, recurrent implantation failure (RIF) has no clear definition and no clearly identified impaired function. Hence, the term RIF is currently used somewhat haphazardly, on the basis of clinicians' judgment. OBJECTIVE: International experts in reproductive medicine met on July 1, 2022, in Lugano, Switzerland, to review the different facets of RIF and define the diagnosis and its appropriate management. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review without meta-analysis of studies published in English from January 2015 to May 2022. FINDINGS: Data indicated that RIF has been largely overevaluated, overdiagnosed, and overtreated without sufficient critical assessment of its true nature. Our analyses show that true RIF is extremely uncommon-occurring in <5% of couples with infertility-and that reassurance and continued conventional therapies are warranted in most cases of assisted reproductive technology (ART) failure. Although the true biologic determinants of RIF may exist in a small subset of people with infertility, they elude the currently available tools for assessment. Without identification of the true underlying etiology(ies), it is reasonable not to assign this diagnosis to a patient until she has failed at least 3 euploid blastocyst transfers (or the equivalent number of unscreened embryo transfers, adjusted to the patient's age and corresponding euploidy rate). In addition, other factors should be ruled out that may contribute to her reduced odds of sustained implantation. In such cases, implantation failure should not be the only issue considered in case of ART failure because this may result from multiple other factors that are not necessarily repetitive or persistent. In reality, RIF impacting the probability of further ART success is a very rare occurrence. CONCLUSION: True RIF is extremely uncommon, occurring in <5% of couples with infertility. Reassurance and continued conventional therapies are warranted in most cases. It would seem reasonable not to assign this diagnosis to a patient until she has failed at least 3 euploid embryo transfers (or the equivalent number of unscreened embryos, adjusted to her age). RELEVANCE: Given the number of internationally recognized experts in the field present at the Lugano meeting 2022, our publication constitutes a consensus statement.

Limits imposed by the experimental design of a large prospective non-inferiority study on PGT-A invalidate many of the conclusions.

The New England Journal of Medicine recently published a large study addressing the efficacy of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). The 14-centre randomized control non-inferiority trial used cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) as a clinical endpoint to examine the value of PGT-A and concluded that conventional IVF was not inferior to IVF with PGT-A. Unfortunately, the experimental design was highly flawed; and in fact, the data generated in the study do not support the major conclusions presented in the publication. The embryos in each patient's three-embryo pool, which were available for transfer, were selected solely by morphology. The investigators then randomized patients to either the PGT-A group or the control group. It is important to note that PGT-A screening in the study group was done only after the embryos were selected. PGT-A was not really used in a meaningful way, which would have been for the PGT-A results to help in selecting which embryos would be in the three-embryo group. Thus, the outcomes were wholly determined prior to the study intervention. The ultimate delivery rate for each group of three embryos was determined when they were selected by morphology. The randomization, which occurred after embryo selection, would assure equal distribution of those cohorts destined to deliver and those destined to fail to the two study groups, the PGT-A and control groups. Thus, there was no potential for PGT-A to enhance selection and thus no possible way to improve the cumulative outcomes. Since there was no possible way for the control group to be inferior, the experimental design precluded any chance of evaluating the primary endpoint of the study. The primary question of the study was never evaluated. Another serious flaw was that the study was initiated prior to knowing how to interpret the data provided in the PGT-A analytical result. Specifically, the design excluded mosaic embryos from transfer despite the literature demonstrating the significant reproductive potential for these embryos. When accounting for the lost deliveries induced by this non-evidence-based decision, the expected delivery rates in the two groups become virtually identical. That is an important issue because the data from the study actually demonstrate the safety of PGT-A without diminution in outcomes from the impact of trophectoderm biopsy or the discarding of competent embryos which had wrongfully been considered aneuploid. A final serious flaw in the experimental design and interpretation of the data surrounding the issue of the miscarriage rate. The investigators noted that the miscarriage rate was lower in the PGT-A group but stated that its impact was insufficient to alter the CLBR. Of course, by design, the CLBRs were limited to being equivalent. There was no potential for enhanced outcomes in the PGT-A group and thus no possibility that the lower risk of miscarriage in the PGT-A group would raise the CLBR. The benefit of a lower miscarriage rate is real and significant. Its relevance should not be diminished based on the lack of a change in the CLBR since that was never possible in this study. The investigators of the study concluded that the CLBR with conventional ART is equivalent to that with PGT-A, but a simple review of the experiment reassigns their genuine findings to those of a safety study. Significantly, the data in the study demonstrate that the intervention of PGT-A is safe. This study neither supports nor refutes the efficacy of clinical PGT-A.

Calcium Ionophore A23187 treatment to rescue unfertilized oocytes: a prospective randomized analysis of sibling oocytes.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Can 1-day old human unfertilized oocytes activate and blastulate after exposure to calcium ionophore (Ca.I) A23187? DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial analysis of sibling oocytes. Seventy unfertilized sibling oocytes from 24 couples were randomly split into two groups. In the treatment group, 35 oocytes were cultured with 5-µM Ca.I A23187 for 10 min, washed and cultured until day 6 of development (D+6). The remaining 35 oocytes (control group) were similarly cultured until D+6. Activation, cleavage and blastulation rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Comparable activation rates were observed in the oocytes incubated with Ca.I A23187 and in the control group (11.4% versus 17.1%; P = 0.49). The cleavage rate observed was 45.7% in both groups. None of the embryos reached blastocyst stage. CONCLUSIONS: Activation and cleavage can occur in unfertilized oocytes after the diagnosis of failure to fertilize. Unfortunately, the prevalence of activation is not affected by exposure to Ca.I A23187. Additionally, these embryos have no tangible reproductive potential as they arrest before reaching the blastocyst stage.

Gonadotropin receptor polymorphisms (FSHR N680S and LHCGR N312S) are not predictive of clinical outcome and live birth in assisted reproductive technology.

OBJECTIVE: To study the consequences of specific genotype profiles of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) and luteinizing hormone choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) on assisted reproductive technology outcomes when preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is used for controlling the embryo ploidy status. The most common reported single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the amino acid position for the FSHR (N680S; N: asparagine, S: serine; [rs6166]) and the LHCGR (N312S variant; N: asparagine, S: serine [rs2293275]) were chosen for this study. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Private Fertility Clinic. PATIENT(S): All women aged 18-40 years undergoing their first assisted reproductive technology cycle with aneuploidy screening between 2006 and 2017 with body mass index of >18 and <40 kg/m2 were included. INTERVENTION(S): All patients received both recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropin or low dose human chorionic gonadotropin. Genomic DNA was isolated from patients' blood. Genotyping of the FSHR and LHCGR polymorphisms was performed using TaqMan genotyping assays. Associations between both receptor genotypes and clinical outcomes were assessed using generalized regression and ANOVA. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Live birth rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included oocyte yield, mature oocytes, blastulation rate, usable blastocyst rate, and implantation rate. RESULT(S): A total of 1,183 patients met the inclusion criteria and generated reliable genotype results. The overall genotype frequencies in the study population for the FSHR gene were as follows: 21.7% homozygous for S in codon 680, 29.2% homozygous for N680, and 48.1% heterozygous (N680S). As for the LHCGR, 15.6% were homozygous for N312, 38.5% homozygous for S312 and 45.9% heterozygous (N312S). Our study population consisted of 53.8% non-Hispanic white; 6.1% Hispanic white; 4.1% Afro-American; 15.4% Asian; and 20.6% other or unknown. No significant association was found with any of the studied variables (oocyte yield, usable blastocyst rate, implantation rate, live birth) when genotypes were analyzed per receptor or in combination with one another. There was a statistically significant but clinically irrelevant difference in the rate of mature oocytes across different variant combinations. CONCLUSION(S): Our findings suggest that the presence of gonadotropin receptor polymorphisms in both FSHR N680S and LHCGR N312S are not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes; therefore, these variants should not be considered reproductive predictors.

The chances of obtaining a euploid embryo and subsequent live birth remain consistent with national age-based rates after an in vitro fertilization cycle that produced only aneuploid embryos.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognosis of patients who were only able to obtain aneuploid embryos in their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle if they attempted a second cycle. DESIGN: Case series and retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single, large fertility center. PATIENT(S): All patients who obtained only aneuploid embryos after IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy during the initial cycle and returned for a second cycle. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The percentage of patients who obtained a euploid embryo and live birth rates in the second cycle, stratified by Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology-defined age groups, was compared with that of controls from the same period. RESULT(S): A total of 538 patients with only aneuploid embryos in their first cycle were included. Three hundred (56%) patients obtained euploid blastocysts in the second cycle, with younger women having a higher chance of obtaining at least 1 euploid embryo (81% in women aged <35 years vs. 25% in women aged >42 years). The cumulative live birth rates were 71%, 62%, 46%, 27%, and 13% for the age groups <35, 35-37, 38-40, 41-42, and >42 years, respectively. The live birth rates per first embryo transfer were >57% across all the age groups and similar to those of the controls in the same age groups. CONCLUSION(S): Patients who obtained only aneuploid embryos during their initial IVF cycle retained favorable prognosis in their second cycle, with outcomes comparable with the national age-based standards. Younger women and those who had more embryos available for biopsy had the highest chance of success. These women should receive age-appropriate counseling and should not be discouraged from a second IVF attempt based on the results of their first cycle.