Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: a real-life observational study.

AIMS: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been demonstrated to improve outcomes in reduced ejection fraction heart failure (HFrEF) patients. However, MRAs added to conventional treatment may lead to worsening of renal function and hyperkalaemia. We investigated, in a population-based analysis, the long-term effects of MRA treatment in HFrEF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed data of 6046 patients included in the Metabolic Exercise Cardiac Kidney Index score dataset. Analysis was performed in patients treated (n = 3163) and not treated (n = 2883) with MRA. The study endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, urgent heart transplantation, or left ventricular assist device implantation. Ten years' survival was analysed through Kaplan-Meier, compared by log-rank test and propensity score matching. At 10 years' follow-up, the MRA-untreated group had a significantly lower number of events than the MRA-treated group (P < 0.001). MRA-treated patients had more severe heart failure (higher New York Heart Association class and lower left ventricular ejection fraction, kidney function, and peak VO2 ). At a propensity-score-matching analysis performed on 1587 patients, MRA-treated and MRA-untreated patients showed similar study endpoint values. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, MRA treatment does not affect the composite of cardiovascular death, urgent heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation in a real-life setting. A meticulous patient follow-up, as performed in trials, is likely needed to match the positive MRA-related benefits observed in clinical trials.

Prognostic role of ß-blocker selectivity and dosage regimens in heart failure patients. Insights from the MECKI score database.

AIMS: The use of ß-blockers represents a milestone in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Few studies have compared ß-blockers in HFrEF, and there is little data on the effects of different doses. The present study aimed to investigate in a large database of HFrEF patients (MECKI score database) the association of ß-blocker treatment with a composite outcome of cardiovascular death, urgent heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation, addressing the role of ß-selectivity and dosage regimens. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 5242 HFrEF patients, we investigated the role of: (i) ß-blocker treatment vs. non-ß-blocker treatment, (ii) ß1-/ß2-receptor-blockers vs. ß1-selective blockers, and (iii) daily ß-blocker dose. Patients were followed for 3.58 years, and 1101 events (18.3%) were observed; 4435 patients (86.8%) were on ß-blockers, while 807 (13.2%) were not. At 5 years, ß-blocker-patients showed a better outcome than non-ß-blocker-subjects [hazard ratio (HR) 0.48, P < 0.0001], while also considering potential confounders. A comparable prognosis was observed at 5 years in the ß1-/ß2-receptor-blocker (n = 2219) vs. ß1-selective group (n = 2216) (HR 0.95, P = ns). A better prognosis was observed in high-dose (>2 5 mg carvedilol equivalent daily dose, n = 1005) patients than in both medium dose (12.5-25 mg, n = 1431) and low dose (<12.5 mg, n = 1960) (HR 1.97, P < 0.001; HR 1.95, P = 0.001, respectively), with no differences between the last two groups (HR 0.84, P = ns). CONCLUSION: In a large population of chronic HFrEF patients, ß-blockers were associated with a more favourable prognosis without any difference between ß1- and ß2-receptor-blockers vs. ß1-selective blockers. A better outcome was observed in subjects receiving a high daily dose.