Incidental parathyroidectomy is a frequent complication of thyroid surgery. A retrospective study of 3065 patients.

AIM: The aim of the present study is to investigate the incidence of accidental parathyroidectomy and the connection between the type of surgery, or the resected piece sent for histopathological examination and the number of accidentally excised parathyroid glands. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who had thyroid surgery between January 2005 and December 2014 and were admitted to a surgery clinic from Targu Mures, Romania, were enrolled in this study. For statistical analysis we used Chi-squared test, Student's t-test and ANOVA test, with a p value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 3065 patients (315 males, 2750 females) were included in our study, with a mean age of 49.66±13.73. The frequence of incidental parathyroidectomy was 15.36%, most patients with IPT (88.95%) had only one parathyroid gland removed and we found a statistically significant association (p = 0.01) between the incidence of IPT and the type of surgery. DISCUSSION: Iatrogenic injury of the parathyroid glands cause hypoparathyroidism which can be transient in majority and permanent in 1.5% of the patients. The most frequent cases with accidental removal of the parathyroid glands were total and subtotal thyroidectomies (79.6%), respectively reinterventions or completion thyroidectomies (10.62%). CONCLUSIONS: Incidental parathyroidectomy is not uncommon following thyroid surgery, even in the hands of experienced surgeons and it is more often seen in female patients with polynodular goiter according to our study. Total thyroidectomies and reinterventions on the thyroid gland increase the risk of incidental parathyroidectomy. KEY WORDS: Incidental parathyroidectomy, Hypoparathyroidism, Parathyroid glands.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Colorectal Cancer Patients in a Tertiary Center in Romania. Single Center Retrospective Study.

Background: The novel coronavirus, SARS-COV-2, was first reported in Wuhan, China in the end of 2019. To curb its spread, social distancing measures and new safety regulations were implemented which led to major disruptions in colorectal cancer care. It is however unknown how it influenced the Romanian colorectal cancer care. Methods and Material: We assessed the demographical, clinical, intraoperative and pathological data of our colorectal cancer patients, 302 in total, between 15.03.2019-14.03.2021. The first year's data was considered as the control group and the second one, the study (pandemic) group. Results: We observed a 12% decrease in colorectal cancer hospitalizations in the first year, 38,6% in the first six months. The rate of emergency admissions, colo/ileostomy formatting procedures, palliative resections, clinical metastasis was higher in the pandemic group. More advanced locoregional invasion, a higher tumor stage, higher rate of vascular, perineural invasion, positive resection margin, and a higher lymph node yield was seen after the restrictions were implemented. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic and the response against it had a major effect on the colorectal cancer care in our country. The outcomes of these worse clinical and pathological findings are unknown, but it is important to do further research in this field. We think colorectal cancer care should have an absolute priority in future pandemics.