Sexual Health Assessment in Women with Lung Cancer study: Sexual health assessment in women with lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sexual health is understudied and underreported in patients with lung cancer, and most data precede the approval of widely used targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. The authors sought to evaluate the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women with lung cancer in our current clinical environment. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey study was administered online to 249 women via the GO2 for Lung Cancer (GO2) Registry, using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures questionnaire. Participants were recruited between June 2020 to June 2021. Eligibility criteria included age >18 years, self-identifying as a woman, fluency in English, and a lung cancer diagnosis within 10 years. RESULTS: Most (67%) had stage IV lung cancer and 47% were receiving targeted therapy; 66% were undergoing active treatment. Despite 54% of participants reporting "recent" sexual activity, most (77%) indicated having little to no interest in sexual activity and 48% reported recent minimal satisfaction with their sex life. The most common reasons negatively affecting participants' satisfaction with their sex life included fatigue (40%) and feeling sad/unhappy (28%). Common reasons for lack of recent sexual activity included lack of interest (68%) and vaginal dryness or pain (30%). Compared to pre-diagnosis, women were significantly less likely to have recent interest in sexual activity. In multivariable logistic-regression, vaginal dryness showed a significant negative association with recent interest in sexual activity. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual dysfunction is prevalent in women with lung cancer. Sexual health should be integrated into routine care for patients with lung cancer.

Patient reported improvement in sexual health outcomes following care in a sexual health clinic for women with cancer.

PURPOSE: Sexual health concerns are common among female cancer survivors. Few data exist regarding patient-reported outcomes following interventions in this population. We aimed to determine patient-reported adherence and impact of interventions provided in an academic specialty clinic for treatment of sexual health problems. METHODS: A cross-sectional quality improvement survey regarding sexual problems, adherence with recommended therapies, and improvement following intervention was administered to all women seen at the Women's Integrative Sexual Health (WISH) program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison between November 2013 and July 2019. Descriptive and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to explore differences between groups. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty women (median age at first visit = 50 years, 53.1% breast cancer) were identified; N =113 surveys were completed (response rate = 49.6%). The most common presenting complaints were pain with intercourse (87.2%), vaginal dryness (85.3%), and low libido (82.6%). Menopausal women were more likely than premenopausal women to present with vaginal dryness (93.4% vs. 69.7%, p = .001) and pain with intercourse (93.4% vs. 76.5%, p = .02). Nearly all women adhered to recommendations for vaginal moisturizers/lubricants (96.9-100%) and vibrating vaginal wands (82.4-92.3%). A majority found recommended interventions helpful regardless of menopausal status or cancer type and reported persistent improvement. Nearly all women had improvement in understanding sexual health (92%) and would recommend the WISH program to others (91%). CONCLUSION: Women with cancer report integrative sexual health care to address sexual problems that are helpful and result in long-term improvement. Patients are overall highly adherent to recommended therapies, and nearly all would recommend the program to others. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Dedicated care to address sexual health in women after cancer treatment improves patient-reported sexual health outcomes across all cancer types.

Reported Concerns and Acceptance of Information or Referrals Among Breast Cancer Survivors Seen for Care Planning Visits: Results from the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Survivorship Program.

Breast cancer survivors' experience physical and psychosocial concerns following active curative-intent treatment. Survivors' complex needs are often reviewed at survivorship care planning visits (SCP visits). However, little is known about the post-treatment concerns and resource needs addressed within the context of SCP visits. Using discretely collected electronic health record data, we examined characteristics, concerns, and acceptance of education materials and/or referrals among stages 0-3 breast cancer survivors seen for SCP visits. Most survivors reported concerns related to activity (n = 739; 72.7%) and nutrition (n = 677; 66.6%). Survivors of color were more likely to report concerns related to pain/swelling (odds ratio (OR), 4.4; 95% CI, 1.7-11.4) and employment/insurance (2.8; 1.4-5.7) compared to Whites. More than half accepted materials or referrals for concerns related to nutrition, activity/pain, substance use, sexual health, mood, and sleep (padj-value < 0.05). However, not all reported concerns led to acceptance of materials or referrals. Survivors seen for SCP visits report a wide range of concerns at the end of active curative-intent treatment but may not necessarily accept materials or referrals for their concerns within the context of these visits. Our findings highlight the importance of exercise, physical rehabilitation, and nutrition interventions for survivors following active curative-intent treatment. Further study is needed to elucidate the reasons for acceptance vs. non-acceptance of resources addressing reported concerns.

Development, Implementation, and Patient Perspectives of the Women's Integrative Sexual Health Program: A Program Designed to Address the Sexual Side Effects of Cancer Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Advanced practitioners (APs) are a growing demographic in survivorship care. One goal of survivorship care is to manage consequences of cancer treatments. Sexual dysfunction from prior therapies can impact quality of life. Advanced practitioners are perfectly poised to provide care for sexual problems. This article will describe the development and implementation of the Women's Integrative Sexual Health (WISH) program by APs within a comprehensive cancer center and describe patient perspectives of care provided. METHODS: Two physician assistants working in gynecologic oncology at the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center implemented a program to address sexual side effects of cancer treatment. An online survey was sent out to all patients seen in the WISH program since inception. RESULTS: Between November 2013 and July 2019, 228 patients were seen in the WISH program. A total of 113 women responded (median age: 53 years, range: 31-77; 68% postmenopausal; response rate: 53.8%). Most had breast (57%) or gynecologic (32%) cancers. When asked how helpful the WISH program was, 88% reported that it was at least somewhat helpful. Almost all (95%) reported they would recommend the WISH program to other women. CONCLUSION: The WISH program enhances comprehensive survivorship care of female cancer survivors. Women report they benefit from care for sexual issues after cancer treatments. Advanced practitioners working in oncology are uniquely positioned to educate themselves, take leadership roles in the development and implementation of programs, and provide care to women affected by sexual side effects after cancer.

A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed survivorship care plan receipt on patient satisfaction and knowledge of diagnosis and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Survivorship care plans (SCPs) and care-planning sessions have been recommended for over a decade, yet evidence for their benefit remains mixed. In a randomized trial, changes in survivor knowledge and satisfaction before and after the receipt of an SCP were assessed. METHODS: Patients with breast cancer who had completed curative-intent treatment were randomized to immediate versus delayed receipt of an individualized SCP. All participants completed the modified Wisconsin Survey of Cancer Diagnosis and Management in Breast Cancer and the Preparing for Life As a New Survivor survey to assess individual knowledge about cancer diagnosis, treatment, side effects, and follow-up as well as satisfaction with communication and care coordination. Surveys were completed at baseline, at 4 weeks (before delayed receipt), and again at 12 weeks (after all participants had received SCPs); the primary outcome was change in knowledge at 4 weeks. RESULTS: In total, 127 eligible women were randomized. An improvement in individual knowledge was observed between baseline and week 12 for both arms combined (+1.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-2.3; P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in the change in knowledge from baseline through week 4 between the arms. No significant change occurred for satisfaction scores over time. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial of immediate versus delayed SCP receipt demonstrated a small improvement (4%) in survivor knowledge. However, this improvement did not appear to be related to SCP provision. The authors hypothesized that the improvement was because of repeated administration of the knowledge survey. If improved survivor knowledge is a goal, then strategies beyond the 1-time provision and review of an SCP should be explored.

Integrating survivorship care planning in radiation oncology workflow.

Various groups, including the American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer and the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers, are mandating the provision of a survivorship care plan (SCP) to cancer survivors who have completed curative-intent treatment as a requirement for oncology practice accreditation. This article reviews the development of survivorship care, including survivorship care in radiation oncology. Challenges of developing treatment summaries and SCPs and implementing their delivery are explored. Details of the article include how the University of Wisconsin Health radiation oncology department integrated a survivorship visit into the existing radiation oncology workflow. Oncology practices may benefit from the model described here to meet accreditation requirements for SCP delivery to cancer survivors.

Accuracy and Thoroughness of Treatment Summaries Provided as Part of Survivorship Care Plans Prepared by Two Cancer Centers.

PURPOSE: Treatment summaries prepared as part of survivorship care planning should correctly and thoroughly report diagnosis and treatment information. METHODS: As part of a clinical trial, summaries were prepared for patients with stage 0 to III breast cancer at two cancer centers. Summaries were prepared per the standard of care at each center via two methods: using the electronic health record (EHR) to create and facilitate autopopulation of content or using manual data entry into an external software program to create the summary. Each participant's clinical data were abstracted and cross-checked against each summary. Errors were defined as inaccurate information, and omissions were defined as missing information on the basis of the Institute of Medicine recommended elements. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one summaries were reviewed: 80 EHR based versus 41 software based. Twenty-four EHR-based summaries (30%) versus six software-based summaries (15%) contained one or more omissions. Omissions included failure to provide dates and specify all axillary surgeries for EHR-based summaries and failure to specify receptors for software-based summaries. Eight EHR-based summaries (10%) versus 19 software-based summaries (46%) contained one or more errors. Errors in EHR-based summaries were mostly discrepancies in dates, and errors in software-based summaries included incorrect stage, surgeries, chemotherapy, and receptors. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of summaries contained at least one error or omission; some were potentially clinically significant. Mismatches between the clinical scenario and templates contributed to many of the errors and omissions. In an era of required care plan provision, quality measures should be considered and tracked to reduce rates, decrease inadvertent contributions from templates, and support audited data use.

Sexual health education in U.S. physician assistant programs.

INTRODUCTION: Since the 1950s, sexual health education in medical schools has been evaluated and reported upon, but there has never been an assessment published about sexual health curricula in U.S. physician assistant (PA) programs. AIM: The aim of this study was to gain better understanding of how PA programs cover sexual health topics. METHODS: Between January and March 2014, 181 accredited PA programs received a mailed survey inquiring about their sexual health curriculum. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The survey assessed general sexual health topics; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) topics; teaching methods; and the amount of time spent on sexual health education. RESULTS: A total of 106 programs responded (59%). Ten programs offered a required, discrete course on human sexuality. The majority incorporated training into other coursework, which is consistent with most medical schools. LGBT topics were covered less thoroughly than the general sexual health topics. Total amount of time spent on sexual health topics varied widely among programs, from a minimum of 2-4 hours to a maximum of 60 hours, with a median of 12 hours. CONCLUSIONS: PA programs in the United States appear to compare favorably with the training offered to medical students in regard to time spent on sexual health education. Transgender issues were least well-covered of all the topics queried.

Survivors of endometrial cancer: who is at risk for sexual dysfunction?

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine the prevalence of sexual dysfunction and identify risk factors associated with sexual morbidity in patients with early stage endometrial cancer. METHODS: This prospective trial included patients with stage I-IIIa endometrial cancer, without evidence of disease, and one to five years out from primary surgical treatment. Patients who received chemotherapy were excluded. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was used to measure our primary endpoint of sexual function. Other patient reported outcome indices included: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endometrial (FACT-En), Center for Epidemiology Studies Depression scale (CES-D), and Menopausal Rating Scale (MRS). RESULTS: Of the 72 women treated for early stage endometrial cancer, 65% were married, 69% had a sexual partner, the mean age was 60, 86% had stage I disease, and 18% received radiation therapy. The median score for the FSFI was 16.6 (0-32.8; scores below 26 are diagnostic for sexual dysfunction). Eighty nine percent of the patients had a score below 26. There was a moderate correlation between the total FSFI score and FACT-En scores but not with CES-D or MRS. Histologic grade, relationship status, mental health, and diabetes significantly correlated with total FSFI scores in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This patient population commonly thought to be at low risk actually suffers from severe sexual dysfunction. The four risk factors revealed by multivariate analysis need to be studied in greater detail in order to appropriately target patients and develop meaningful interventions.