Resident simulation training in endoscopic endonasal surgery utilizing haptic feedback technology.

Simulated practice may improve resident performance in endoscopic endonasal surgery. Using the NeuroTouch haptic simulation platform, we evaluated resident performance and assessed the effect of simulation training on performance in the operating room. First- (N=3) and second- (N=3) year residents were assessed using six measures of proficiency. Using a visual analog scale, the senior author scored subjects. After the first session, subjects with lower scores were provided with simulation training. A second simulation served as a task-learning control. Residents were evaluated in the operating room over six months by the senior author-who was blinded to the trained/untrained identities-using the same parameters. A nonparametric bootstrap testing method was used for the analysis (Matlab v. 2014a). Simulation training was associated with an increase in performance scores in the operating room averaged over all measures (p=0.0045). This is the first study to evaluate the training utility of an endoscopic endonasal surgical task using a virtual reality haptic simulator. The data suggest that haptic simulation training in endoscopic neurosurgery may contribute to improvements in operative performance. Limitations include a small number of subjects and adjudication bias-although the trained/untrained identity of subjects was blinded. Further study using the proposed methods may better describe the relationship between simulated training and operative performance in endoscopic Neurosurgery.

Intramedullary injection of contrast into the cervical spinal cord during cervical myelography: a case report.

STUDY DESIGN: A case of iatrogenic intramedullary contrast injection during a C1-C2 cervical myelography is reported. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence of iatrogenic intramedullary contrast injection during a current C1-C2 cervical myelography. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Intramedullary injection of contrast is a rare but serious complication of C1-C2 cervical myelography that has not been reported since the widespread use of magnetic resonance imaging and the NASCIS III study protocol. METHODS: A 39-year-old woman received an iatrogenic intramedullary contrast injection during a C1-C2 cervical myelography. RESULTS: During the procedure the patient reported right-side face, neck, and arm pain and parethesias. After the procedure, right arm weakness and diffuse hyperreflexia developed. Postmyelography imaging demonstrated intramedullary contrast and cord swelling. High-dose methylprednisolone was administered intravenously and the patient's symptoms improved. The literature and management of this rare complication are reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary cord injection is a rare complication of cervical myelography. The mechanism of spinal cord injury appears to involve a combination of physical compression from the injected liquid and neurotoxicity of the contrast material. Iohexol rather than metrizamide should be used when C1-C2 myelography is indicated in patients who are unable to undergo magnetic resonance imaging, or those whose pathology is inadequately demonstrated magnetic resonance imaging alone. In the event of contrast injection into the spinal cord, administration of high-dose methylprednisolone is recommended.