Association of prescription of oral sodium polystyrene sulfonate with sorbitol in an inpatient setting with colonic necrosis: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Colonic necrosis has been reported after sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS)/sorbitol use, but the incidence and relative risk (RR) are not established. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 123,391 adult inpatients at a tertiary medical center. PREDICTOR: Receipt of SPS prescriptions (exposed) or a prescription other than SPS (unexposed internal comparison group) between September 1, 2001, and October 31, 2010. OUTCOMES: The main outcome measure was tissue-confirmed diagnosis of colonic necrosis, considered SPS-associated if SPS was prescribed 30 or fewer days before tissue accession date. MEASUREMENTS: Demographics, serum chemistry test results, hospital location, and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnostic codes. RESULTS: SPS was prescribed to 2,194 inpatients. 82 inpatient colonic necrosis cases were identified. 3 received oral SPS (1 gram per 4 milliliters of 33% sorbitol) 30 or fewer days before the colonic necrosis accession date (3.7% of inpatient colonic necrosis cases). The data were linked with 123,391 individuals who received inpatient prescriptions between the same dates. Colonic necrosis incidence was 0.14% (95% CI, 0.03%-0.40%) in those prescribed SPS versus 0.07% (95% CI, 0.05-0.08%) in those not prescribed SPS (RR, 2.10; 95% CI, 0.68-6.48; P = 0.2). The number needed to harm was 1,395 (95% CI, 298-5,100). Subgroup analysis (age >65 years; estimated glomerular filtration rate, <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), intensive care unit admission, or surgical ward status) did not show significant associations. Sample-size analysis indicated that 4,974 SPS-treated individuals older than 65 years and a comparison group 10 times larger would be required for rigorous multivariate analysis of SPS-associated colonic necrosis risk. LIMITATIONS: Individuals with colonic necrosis admitted to non-Department of Defense hospitals would not have been ascertained. Only individuals who had colonic biopsy or surgical tissue submitted for pathologic review could be ascertained as having colonic necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: SPS-associated colonic necrosis is rare, and inpatient SPS/sorbitol prescription was not associated significantly with an increased RR of colonic necrosis in this retrospective cohort analysis. Multivariate analysis would require retrospective clinical cohorts from larger or more than one hospital system(s).

Use of beta-blockers and aspirin after myocardial infarction by patient renal function in the Department of Defense health care system.

BACKGROUND: Whether the previously reported underutilization of standard-of-care medications in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) persists in more recent years or differs by ward of admission has not been reported. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients hospitalized with a discharge diagnosis of incident AMI to a Department of Defense hospital (Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC) from 2001 through 2004. Use of beta-blockers and aspirin at the time of discharge after AMI was assessed according to Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in milliliters per minute per 1.73 m2, stratified by admission to the coronary care unit (CCU) versus other wards. Adjusted odds ratios for discharge beta-blocker and aspirin therapy were calculated by using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 431 patients, overall discharge use of beta-blockers was 86.8%, and aspirin, 86.8%, both significantly greater after CCU admission than admission to other wards (93%, aspirin use; 91.7%, beta-blocker use; P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). In logistic regression, CCU admission was the only independent factor associated with either beta-blocker or aspirin use; MDRD eGFR was not associated significantly with beta-blocker and aspirin use regardless of admission to the CCU or non-CCU. CONCLUSION: Future studies of disparities in use of standard-of-care medications after AMI according to renal function should account for the primary site of admission, particularly CCU versus others. In addition, legitimate contraindications to the use of beta-blockers and aspirin may be subtle, including appropriate end-of-life decisions.