[Use of hypnosis in radiotherapy as an alternative to general anesthesia in pediatric radiation oncology]. / Radiothérapie des enfants de moins de cinq ans : peut-on limiter les anesthésies itératives par les rituels et l'hypnose ?

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia (GA) is often needed for radiotherapy (RT) in young children. This study aimed to evaluate the place of the rituals and/or hypnosis in pediatric in a reference center in pediatric radiation oncology in Rhône-Alpes Auvergne. METHODS: This observational study retrospectively collected data on AG in children<5 years treated by RT in Leon-Berard regional center, Lyon, France between 2003 and 2014. Two-time periods, before and after 2008 have been compared, the second one introducing accompaniment methods such as hypnosis systematically. Explanatory analyses of AG were performed using logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two children benefited from RT in that period and were included (70 patients until 2008, 62 after 2008). Fifty-three percent were irradiated under GA. There was significant reduction (P<0.1) in the use of GA after 2008. The use of GA was not significantly associated with the RT techniques. The patients more likely to undergo RT without GA were the oldest and the patients treated for abdominal lesions (P<0.01). DISCUSSION: The study confirms that rituals and hypnosis can be used instead of GA in about half of patients under 5 years, even also with high-technicity RT requiring optimal immobilization.

Combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cryotherapy and surgical resection for the treatment of unresectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study was conducted to assess the safety, efficacy, and long-term results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cryotherapy as additional means for eradicating liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma when curative treatment was not possible by resection alone. METHODS: Between January 1996 and December 1997, 131 patients with unresectable liver metastases were referred to our department and received chemotherapy. After 3-6 months of chemotherapy, curative surgery of liver metastases was considered possible in 57 patients, either by resection alone in 33 patients (25%) or cryotherapy associated with resection in 24 patients (18%). Characteristics and survival of patients in the cryotherapy plus resection group were compared with those of the 33 patients in the resection group. RESULTS: All patients in the resection group had partial response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the cryotherapy plus resection group, neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulted in 13 partial responses, 9 stable diseases, and 2 disease progressions. The rate of postoperative complications in the entire series was 14%. No major difference was seen between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 48 months, the median survival time was 39 months. The survival rates at 1, 3, and 4 years were similar in both groups: 94, 58, and 37% in the resection group and 92, 50, and 36% in the cryotherapy plus resection group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, cryotherapy, and liver resection constitutes a promising treatment strategy for patients with extremely advanced metastatic liver involvement. Patients having more than four liver metastases from a colorectal carcinoma or patients with a poor liver reserve due to previous resection should be screened carefully to determine whether they could be candidates for this procedure.