The Effect of the Charlson Comorbidity Index On In-Hospital Complications, Hospital Length of Stay, Mortality, and Readmissions Among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Stroke.

Aim A notable number of people who develop stroke have comorbid medical conditions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to predict in-hospital complications, mortality, length of stay, and readmission rates in stroke patients. Method It is a retrospective study that analyzed patients who were admitted for stroke in a six-month time duration. Stroke was classified into ischemic, hemorrhagic, or undetermined; hospital complications were classified into medical or neurological. Data regarding comorbidities, complications, length of stay, mortality, and readmissions were documented. Comorbidities were then classified by the CCI and split into four categories: zero, mild (1-2), moderate (3-4) and severe (5+). The data was analyzed using SPSS (IBM, Inc., Armonk, US). Results Four hundred and seventy-three adults aged above 18 were hospitalized for acute stroke. There was no correlation between the severity of the CCI score and mortality. Patients with ischemic stroke had a higher CCI correlated with readmission rate (p=0.026) and hospital complications (p=0.054). The two groups with the highest intensive care unit admission rate were mild, followed by the severe group (p=0.001). Our study also revealed that the patients with severe CCI scores had an increased readmission rate (p=0.001). Conclusion There is a correlation between a high CCI score and readmission rate, as well as CCI score with hospital complications in ischemic stroke. Further prospective studies of a longer duration can be undertaken to find further associations with the potential for this score to be used as a predictor in patients hospitalized for stroke.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Willingness regarding Organ Donation in a Muslim Country: A Report from the United Arab Emirates.

In Islamic countries, many religious scholars have allowed organ transplantation. However, ethical judgments on organ transplantation are disputable and unpredictable. Therefore, opinions about organ transplantation depend on personal beliefs, as well as religious faith, cultural convictions, and sociocultural factors, which deserve discussion and study. The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge of and attitudes toward organ donation in a multicultural society such as Dubai. A questionnaire was designed by a multidisciplinary team through a review of the literature. Participants were approached from October 2018 until September 2019. Our study showed a poor general knowledge of organ donation overall (447, 66%) and low awareness of the organ donation laws and regulations in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) (376, 55%). Most respondents mentioned that they were not willing to register to be an organ donor (393, 58%); nevertheless, they would accept an organ donation (347, 51%), even from a recently deceased person if required (376, 55%). The UAE faces scarcity among plenty as far as organ donation is concerned. Our study identified several consistent themes regarding barriers to organ donation among people in the UAE. The ever-increasing demand for organs can only be met by a multidisciplinary approach to educate the public and health-care providers further.