What are the respiratory health research priorities in Alberta, Canada? A stakeholder consultation.

OBJECTIVE: The Respiratory Health Strategic Clinical Network (RHSCN) was launched to facilitate respiratory and sleep health through implementation of innovative, patient-centred, evidence-informed coordinated services in Alberta. In collaboration with project partners, the RHSCN aimed to determine the respiratory research priorities for Alberta. DESIGN: The four phases of this research prioritisation project were (1) identifying research questions from stakeholders, (2) determining which research questions had been answered in existing literature, (3) prioritising unanswered questions and (4) finalising the priorities through an inperson workshop. SETTING: The study occurred in Alberta, Canada over a 2-year period beginning in March 2017. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 448 patients, clinicians and other stakeholders consented to participate in the survey. RESULTS: A total of 595 possible questions were submitted, with 343 unique questions identified. Of the questions, 94 were out of scope, 155 answered by existing literature and 10 were combined with others, while 83 were determined to be unanswered in the literature. Stakeholders were surveyed again to prioritise the remaining 83 questions and they were reviewed by the project's Steering Committee (clinicians and patients). At the inperson workshop, the Steering Committee identified 17 research topics as priority areas for respiratory and sleep research in Alberta. CONCLUSION: A stakeholder-led research prioritisation process identified optimal clinical management/follow-up, equitable access to services, and management of social, psychological and mental health issues related to respiratory/sleep health as priority research areas.

Potassium disturbance associated with an inpatient childhood asthma pathway.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric asthma exacerbations in Alberta are treated via standardized order sets known as the Alberta Acute Childhood Asthma Pathway (ACAP). This pathway is utilized in paediatric tertiary hospitals and in remote and rural locations. Incidence, magnitude, and risk factors for hypokalemia in inpatients receiving salbutamol for asthma exacerbations via this pathway are presently unknown. OBJECTIVE: Establish incidence, magnitude, and risk factors for hypokalemia associated with salbutamol therapy as directed by a paediatric asthma pathway. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using visit-level electronic medical data. Inpatients aged <18 years old receiving salbutamol via the ACAP with at least one potassium level were included. Hypokalemia was defined as mild (3.0 ≤ [K+] < 3.5 mEq/L), moderate (2.5 ≤ [K+] < 3.0 mEq/L), or severe ([K+] < 2.5 mEq/L), as measured in serum or blood gas. Binomial logistic regression was utilized to examine risk factors for hypokalemia, route of administration, location of lowest [K+], nil per os (NPO) status during admission, potassium supplementation, gender, and age. RESULTS: There were 821 patients screened for analysis and 433 patients were analyzed after exclusions. There was an incidence of hypokalemia of 38.8%. Of patients experiencing hypokalemia, 71.4% were mild, 25.6% moderate, and 3.0% severe. Risk factors included nebulized salbutamol, patient location (emergency department or paediatric intensive care unit), and age (>5 years) although these risk factors may actually represent patients receiving higher doses of salbutamol. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the 38.8% of children experiencing hypokalemia associated with the ACAP were mild. Routine monitoring of potassium status in children receiving salbutamol per standardized pathway is recommended for children with described risk factors, and ideally within the first 12 hours of presentation.