Perspectives of young people and their parents in the transition of cochlear implant services: implications for improved service delivery.

OBJECTIVES: Youth and young adults with cochlear implants are now transitioning from pediatric to adult services in increasing numbers. Research in other areas of health care has indicated that there is a gap in the transition from pediatric services for the young adult, and that it is important to obtain their perspectives to reduce disruption and improve care. Previous research has documented issues from the perspective of cochlear implant professionals. The objectives of this study were to examine current practices from the perspective of young adults and their families and to make recommendations for future practice. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 11 individuals, including cochlear implant recipients and their parents. All patients were within 4 years of transition between pediatric and adult hospital services: four youths were pediatric patients, and two had been discharged to adult services. Qualitative research methodology was used to identify key themes. RESULTS: All participants indicated that they had not anticipated a change to an adult hospital as part of their plan of care. Key themes from interviews were differences between pediatric and adult hospitals, challenges in establishing new relationships with professionals, specific concerns about new health care settings and procedures, and the need for youth to develop independent health-related skills in the context of parental involvement. DISCUSSION: Themes identified through interviews with young people with cochlear implants and their parents were similar to research in other areas of health care, as well as to themes identified in focus groups with professionals providing cochlear implant services. There were some differences which highlight both needs in the provision of health care and opportunities for providers and patients to collaborate to provide improved service delivery.

Facilitating the transition from the pediatric to adult cochlear implant setting: perspectives of CI professionals.

OBJECTIVES: Over the last 20 years, the availability of cochlear implantation has resulted in a pediatric population with different health needs than adults who receive cochlear implants (CIs). These pediatric patients are now transitioning to adult hospital settings in significant numbers. This issue of transition is not unique to cochlear implant services: research in other chronic health conditions has documented a variety of challenges for youth and health care providers. The objectives of this study were to identify factors important in the transition from pediatric to adult CI services from the perspective of service providers and to make recommendations to improve transition practices in the future. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with professionals providing specialized CI services in pediatric and adult hospitals, and specialized educators in the school setting. Qualitative research methodology was used to identify key themes. Data extracted from patient files allowed comparison of pediatric and adult CI recipients. RESULTS: Youth who had received CIs in the pediatric setting differed from other adult patients in the incidence of prelingual hearing losses, and age at CI surgery. Key focus group themes were related to service delivery models, communication between settings, and skills needed by the patients to effectively meet their own health needs. DISCUSSION: Factors identified by CI professionals were very similar to those identified in research for other health conditions. From the focus groups, as well as other literature, a number of recommendations are proposed to facilitate a positive transition of young people to adult health care.

Users' perspectives on the benefits of FM systems with cochlear implants.

This study explored: (1) the benefits of an FM system in real-world environments from the perspective of adults with coch-lear implants, and (2) the factors and barriers to using an FM system with a cochlear implant. Using a qualitative research design, 14 adults with unilateral cochlear implants recorded their experiences during a two-month trial period with a personal FM system and responded to a questionnaire at the end of the trial. A detailed analysis of 169 journal entries (230 hours of FM use) permitted a description of the benefits and negative aspects associated with FM use in everyday listening environments. The primary benefits were related to improved access to and quality of sound, improved distance listening, ease of listening, and better social integration. Negative perceptions were associated with the equipment both with regard to physical aspects and adjustments. In addition, technical, individual, social, and environmental factors were identified that can influence the user's decision to use the FM device. Questionnaire responses indicated that the majority of individuals rated the FM system as somewhat or very helpful. The findings suggest that FM systems can improve communication in everyday listening environments for some adults with cochlear implants.

The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implantation has become a standard practice for adults with severe to profound hearing loss who demonstrate limited benefit from hearing aids. Despite the substantial auditory benefits provided by cochlear implants, many adults experience difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments and in other challenging listening conditions such as television. Remote microphone technology may provide some benefit in these situations; however, little is known about whether these systems are effective in improving speech understanding in difficult acoustic environments for this population. This study was undertaken with adult cochlear implant recipients to assess the potential benefits of remote microphone technology. The objectives were to examine the measurable and perceived benefit of remote microphone devices during television viewing and to assess the benefits of a frequency-modulated system for speech understanding in noise. DESIGN: Fifteen adult unilateral cochlear implant users were fit with remote microphone devices in a clinical environment. The study used a combination of direct measurements and patient perceptions to assess speech understanding with and without remote microphone technology. The direct measures involved a within-subject repeated-measures design. Direct measures of patients' speech understanding during television viewing were collected using their cochlear implant alone and with their implant device coupled to an assistive listening device. Questionnaires were administered to document patients' perceptions of benefits during the television-listening tasks. Speech recognition tests of open-set sentences in noise with and without remote microphone technology were also administered. RESULTS: Participants showed improved speech understanding for television listening when using remote microphone devices coupled to their cochlear implant compared with a cochlear implant alone. This benefit was documented both when listening to news and talk show recordings. Questionnaire results also showed statistically significant differences between listening with a cochlear implant alone and listening with a remote microphone device. Participants judged that remote microphone technology provided them with better comprehension, more confidence, and greater ease of listening. Use of a frequency-modulated system coupled to a cochlear implant also showed significant improvement over a cochlear implant alone for open-set sentence recognition in +10 and +5 dB signal to noise ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Benefits were measured during remote microphone use in focused-listening situations in a clinical setting, for both television viewing and speech understanding in noise in the audiometric sound suite. The results suggest that adult cochlear implant users should be counseled regarding the potential for enhanced speech understanding in difficult listening environments through the use of remote microphone technology.

Users' experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid.

This study examined: (1) the prevalence of hearing-aid use in a clinical population of adults with unilateral cochlear implants, (2) the relationship between hearing-aid use, severity of hearing loss, duration of deafness and duration of cochlear implant use, and (3) the benefits of bimodal hearing from the users' perspective. Using a retrospective design, 31 adults were identified as bimodal users, and 93 adults implanted in the same period were identified as non hearing-aid users. The two groups were similar in regards to duration of deafness but differed in severity of hearing loss and time since implantation. Questionnaires examining frequency and situations of hearing-aid use were completed by 24 of 31 bimodal users. Fifteen of these 24 adults reported hearing-aid use more than 50% of the time. These findings suggest that, of the 72 adults in this study with useable hearing (pure-tone average better than 110 dB), about 30% or less regularly combined a hearing aid and cochlear implant. The questionnaire results suggest that regular bimodal users prefer bimodal hearing across a variety of listening environments such as music, noise, and reverberation.

Speech coding strategies and revised cochlear implant candidacy: an analysis of post-implant performance.

OBJECTIVE: Technological advances in cochlear implant systems on which a sequence of speech coding strategies have been implemented seem to have resulted in improved speech perception. However, changing selection criteria for implantation have coincided with evolving technology and may confound post-implantation speech perception performance. This study compares speech coding strategy with speech perception performance in severe and profound postlingually deafened adults using one of three successive generations of Nucleus Cochlear Implant speech processors (i.e., Mini Speech Processor, Spectra 22, and SPrint) implementing three speech coding strategies (i.e., MPEAK, SPEAK, and Advanced Combination Encoders; Cochlear Corporation, Englewood, CO, U.S.A.). STUDY DESIGN: Four cohorts of patients were retrospectively reviewed. SETTING: Multicenter, tertiary referral cochlear implant programs in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Four cohorts of patients (n = 139) were identified based on preimplant audiological measures, duration of deafness, device type, and speech coding strategy. Word and sentence recognition scores at 12 months after implantation were compared using MPEAK with SPEAK22 implemented on the Nucleus 22 speech processors (Mini Speech Processor and Spectra22, respectively) and SPEAK24 as well as Advanced Combination Encoders implemented on the Nucleus 24 SPrint processor. RESULTS: Open-set speech recognition batteries revealed significant improvements in word and sentence scores as advancing technology implemented new speech coding strategies. Subgroup analysis of profoundly deafened patients supported this. Analysis of covariance confirmed that the measured differences could not be accounted for by changing selection criteria for implantation. CONCLUSION: Improvements in performance can be attributed to evolving speech coding strategies and speech processors rather than to differences in preimplant candidacy.

Cochlear implantation for adolescents and adults with prelinguistic deafness.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have suggested that individuals with long-term prelinguistic deafness who receive cochlear implants show little improvement in speech recognition skills. The purpose of this study was to examine the auditory functioning of individuals with prelinguistic deafness who received cochlear implants after the age of 12. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective study of open-set speech recognition was undertaken for 15 patients (adolescents and adults) with prelinguistic deafness who underwent implantation in the Ottawa Cochlear Implant Program. The results of open-set speech perception tests, both words and sentences, were reviewed to assess auditory functioning after implantation. Qualitative data using the Performance Inventory for Profound and Severe Loss questionnaire were also collected for the adults. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The results of this study indicate that individuals with long-term prelinguistic deafness can achieve significant open-set speech understanding with a cochlear implant, although there is a wide range of performance across patients. The results ranged from 0% to 74% for words and 0% to 98% for sentences.