Cetuximab concomitant with gemcitabine and radiotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinomas of upper aerodigestive tract: a pilot study

PURPOSE: To explore the response and toxicity of advanced non-metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of upper aerodigestive tract (SCC-UADT) to a combination of cetuximab concomitant with gemcitabine and radiotherapy. METHODS: We managed patients with concomitant treatment of cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) as uploading dose, then 250 mg/m(2), IV) concomitant with gemcitabine (50 mg/m(2)) weekly for seven courses, and radiotherapy in classical fractionation until completion of 70 Gy. Primary endpoints were complete response (CR) to treatment and toxicity. We evaluated patients for toxicity on a weekly basis; evaluation of response included physical examination, endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) scan and biopsy when indicated, and was performed 6 weeks after completion of radiotherapy. Additional evaluations were done every 3 months to document disease status. Between November 2004 and November 2005, 20 patients were included. RESULTS: CR was 82.4%, overall response was 100%. Neck disease reached CR in 61.5% and partial in 38.5% of patients. The main toxicities were nausea, lymphopenia, neutropenia and mucositis. Grade 3 and 4 side effects were presented in 70.6% of patients, but mucositis, and lymphopenia without clinical repercussions, occurred in 88.2% of patients. Gastrostomy was required in 11.8% of patients to maintain nutrition. Radioepithelitis developed in 76.5%, but only three of these (23.1%) were grade III. Median overall survival was 53 months (range 6-55 months) and median progression-free survival has not yet been reached at the time of evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Although toxicity is important, this approach has interesting activity and deserves further investigation (AU)

Expression of AT1 and AT2 angiotensin receptors in astrocytomas is associated with poor prognosis.

Astrocytomas develop intense vascular proliferation, essential for tumour growth and invasiveness. Angiotensin II (ANGII) was initially described as a vasoconstrictor; recent studies have shown its participation in cellular proliferation, vascularisation, and apoptosis. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the expression of ANGII receptors - AT1 and AT2 - and their relationship with prognosis. We studied 133 tumours from patients with diagnosis of astrocytoma who underwent surgery from 1997 to 2002. AT1 and AT2 were expressed in 52 and 44% of the tumours, respectively, when determined by both reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. Ten per cent of low-grade astrocytomas were positive for AT1, whereas grade III and IV astrocytomas were positive in 67% (P<0.001). AT2 receptors were positive in 17% of low-grade astrocytomas and in 53% of high-grade astrocytomas (P=0.01). AT1-positive tumours showed higher cellular proliferation and vascular density. Patients with AT1-positive tumours had a lower survival rate than those with AT1-negative (P<0.001). No association to survival was found for AT2 in the multivariate analysis. Expression of AT1 and AT2 is associated with high grade of malignancy, increased cellular proliferation, and angiogenesis, and is thus related to poor prognosis. These findings suggest that ANGII receptors might be potential therapeutic targets for high-grade astrocytomas.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine concurrent with radiation for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiation is the current standard of treatment for patients with advanced unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Due to the potent radiosensitizing properties of gemcitabine, we decided to assess its efficacy and toxicity with concurrent radiation in patients with advanced HNSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1997 to December 2001, 27 patients with locally advanced HNSCC (stage III, 37%; stage IV, 63%) were enrolled. All received a course of radiotherapy (70 Gy over 7 weeks) concurrent with weekly infusions of gemcitabine at 100 mg/m2 or 50 mg/m2. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for toxicity and 26 for response. Severe mucositis (grade 3-4) was observed in 74% of patients (grade 4, 41%). Severe hematological toxicity was uncommon. Mild and moderate xerostomy was the most common late toxicity in 23 patients (85%). The median radiation dose delivered was 70 Gy (40-80 Gy), 25 patients (93%) received > or = 80% of the intended dose. Gemcitabine dose intensity was > or = 80% in only 13 (48%) patients. The rate of complete and partial responses were 61% and 27%, respectively, for an overall response rate of 88%. At a median follow-up of 13 months (range 6-62), the actuarial 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 37% and 33%, respectively. The only variable associated with prolonged survival (P = 0.0001) was the degree of response. No difference was observed in response or toxicity with either gemcitabine 50 or 100 mg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: The concurrent use of radiotherapy and gemcitabine is effective but produces manageable severe mucositis in a high percentage of patients.

Neuroendocrine marker expression in cervical carcinomas of non-small cell type.

Small-cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix are highly aggressive tumors. Up to 100% of these tumors express at least one neuroendocrine marker such as neuron-specific enolase (NSE), chromogranin A (CgA), and synaptophysin (SYN). In other tumor types such as non-small-cell carcinomas of the lung, colon, and prostate, the presence of these markers has been associated with a better prognosis in some studies, a worsened prognosis in others, or has had no prognostic effect in still other studies. However, little is known about their expression and prognostic significance in the common "non-small-cell" carcinomas of the uterine cervix. The primary tumors of 54 previously untreated patients with histologically confirmed non-small-cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri (squamous carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for expression of NSE, CgA, and SYN. The expression status was correlated to pathological characteristics and outcome. In addition, the expression of these markers was investigated in cervical carcinoma cell lines. None of the 54 tumors expressed NSE or CgA, although SYN was positive in five tumors (9%) of which four were squamous and one was adenocarcinoma. These five patients relapsed within the first 6 months of follow-up and four have died. Among eight cancer cell lines only one was positive for CgA and another one for SYN. We conclude that the neuroendocrine marker SYN is expressed in a small subset of non-small-cell carcinomas of the cervix and its expression seems to correlate with a poor outcome.

Bioavailability of etoposide after oral administration of the solution marketed for intravenous use: therapeutic and pharmacoeconomic perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Oral etoposide administration is a suitable alternative to the intravenous route; therefore, commercial capsules have been developed. Before these capsules were available in Mexico, we studied drug bioavailability after oral administration of the intravenous etoposide solution (IVES). METHODS: Eight adult cancer patients received a 50-mg oral etoposide dose as IVES and blood samples were collected over a period of 24 h. Plasma etoposide concentration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, plasma concentration against time curves were constructed, and bioavailability parameters were calculated. RESULTS: Oral IVES yielded an adequate bioavailability profile because Cmax was 2.38 +/- 0.30 micrograms/mL, AUC was 12.87 +/- 2.02 micrograms/mL and half-life was 6.72 +/- 0.97 h. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that the pharmacokinetic aim is to maintain plasma concentrations between 0.5 and 1.0 microgram/mL for several hours while avoiding high concentrations, i.e., of 10 micrograms/mL or higher, oral administration of 50-mg etoposide as IVES appears to be a suitable dosing option. In addition, oral IVES is considerably less expensive than intravenous administration in terms of both drug presentation and administration.