Do-it-yourself continuous glucose monitoring in people aged 16 to 69 years with type 1 diabetes: A qualitative study.

AIMS: In many countries, real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) is not funded, and cost presents a barrier to access. A do-it-yourself conversion of intermittently scanned CGM (DIY-CGM) is a cheaper alternative. This qualitative study aimed to explore user experiences with DIY-CGM in people aged 16 to 69 years with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Convenience sampling was used to recruit participants for semi-structured virtual interviews exploring experiences of DIY-CGM use. Participants were recruited after completing the intervention arm of a crossover randomised controlled trial that evaluated DIY-CGM versus intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM). Participants were previously naive to DIY-CGM and rt-CGM but not isCGM. The DIY-CGM intervention consisted of a Bluetooth bridge connected to isCGM, adding rt-CGM functionality over 8 weeks. Interviews were transcribed, then thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Interviews were with 12 people aged 16 to 65 years, with T1D: mean age ± SD 43 ± 14 years; baseline mean HbA1c ± SD 60 mmol/mol ± 9.9 (7.6 ± 0.9%) and time in range 59.8% ± 14.8%. Participants perceived that using DIY-CGM improved both glycaemic control and aspects of quality of life. Alarm and trend functionality allowed participants to perceive reduced glycaemic variability overnight and following meals. The addition of a smartwatch increased discrete access to glucose information. There was a high degree of trust in DIY-CGM. Challenges while using DIY-CGM included signal loss during vigorous exercise, alarm fatigue and short battery life. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that for users, DIY-CGM appears to be an acceptable alternative method of rt-CGM.

The Effect of Do-It-Yourself Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Variables and Participant-Reported Outcomes in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

AIM: Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) has several advantages over intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) but generally comes at a higher cost. Do-it-yourself rtCGM (DIY-rtCGM) potentially has benefits similar to those of rtCGM. This study compared outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes using DIY-rtCGM versus isCGM. METHODS: In this crossover trial, adults with type 1 diabetes were randomized to use isCGM or DIY-rtCGM for eight weeks before crossover to use the other device for eight weeks, after a four-week washout period where participants reverted back to isCGM. The primary endpoint was time in range (TIR; 3.9-10 mmol/L). Secondary endpoints included other glycemic control measures, psychosocial outcomes, and sleep quality. RESULTS: Sixty participants were recruited, and 52 (87%) completed follow-up. Glucose outcomes were similar in the DIY-rtCGM and isCGM groups, including TIR (53.1% vs 51.3%; mean difference -1.7% P = .593), glycosylated hemoglobin (57.0 ± 17.8 vs 61.4 ± 12.2 mmol/L; P = .593), and time in hypoglycemia <3.9 mmol/L (3.9 ± 3.8% vs 3.8 ± 4.0%; P = .947). Hypoglycemia Fear Survey total score (1.17 ± 0.52 vs 0.97 ± 0.54; P = .02) and fear of hypoglycemia score (1.18 ± 0.64 vs 0.97 ± 0.45; P = .02) were significantly higher during DIY-rtCGM versus isCGM. Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status (DTSQS) score was also higher with DIY-rtCGM versus isCGM (28.7 ± 5.8 vs 26.0 ± 5.8; P = .04), whereas diabetes-related quality of life was slightly lower (DAWN2 Impact of Diabetes score: 3.11 ± 0.4 vs 3.32 ± 0.51; P = .045); sleep quality did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although the use of DIY-rtCGM did not improve glycemic outcomes compared with isCGM, it positively impacted several patient-reported psychosocial variables. DIY-rtCGM potentially provides an alternative, cost-effective rtCGM option.

User experiences during the transition to calibration-free sensors with remote monitoring while using automated insulin delivery - a qualitative study.

Introduction: To evaluate the experiences of patients with type 1 diabetes following transition from a calibration-requiring to a calibration-free sensor and remote monitoring in the context of using automated insulin delivery (AID). Research design and methods: Fifteen participants aged 7-65 years with type 1 diabetes participating in a longitudinal study used a Medtronic® advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) device with initially calibration-requiring then calibration-free sensors. Qualitative interviews were conducted ≥20 weeks following use of the calibration-requiring and ≥4 weeks after use of the calibration-free sensors/remote monitoring. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes and subthemes. Results: At baseline, mean diabetes duration was 14.5 years ( ± 10.9), mean Hba1c 54.8 mmol/mol ( ± 10.2) (7.2 ± 0.9%) and Time in range 75.4% ( ± 11.6). Participants reported a progressive improvement in digital and lifestyle integration, and device trust following transition to calibration-free sensors with remote monitoring potential. They also reported a reduced need for capillary glucose, increased device satisfaction and trust, and reduced burden of diabetes care. Negative aspects reported included periodic early sensor loss, and for some, impaired integration with mobile devices. Conclusion: Transitioning to calibration-free sensors with remote monitoring while using AHCL was associated with better user experience, including perceptions of improved quality of life and a reduced burden of diabetes care. Appropriate expectation setting, training, and ongoing support allow for the optimal user experience while using AHCL. Clinical trial registration: https://www.anzctr.org.au, identifier ACTRN12621000360819.

Study protocol: Safety and efficacy of smart watch integrated do-it-yourself continuous glucose monitoring in adults with Type 1 diabetes, a randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) management requires regular monitoring of glucose levels and judicious therapeutic administration of insulin to prevent both microvascular and macrovascular complications. Few people with diabetes are able to sustain the self-monitored blood glucose measurements needed for optimal care, and those that do, typically experience significant diabetes-related distress. Both intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offer alternatives to reduce the overall burden, but both still have limitations. Given the expense of CGM, smart watch integrated do-it-yourself (DIY)-CGM has been developed as an alternative to commercial isCGM and CGM technologies. This study has been designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of smart watch integrated DIY-CGM compared with isCGM in adults with T1D. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, crossover study will be conducted in New Zealand and aims to recruit 60 adults with established T1D who currently use isCGM. DIY-CGM will be compared to usual care with isCGM. Participants will be randomised to either arm of the study for 8 weeks followed by a 4-week washout period before crossing over to the other study arm for a further 8 weeks. The primary endpoint is glucose time in range (TIR) defined as percentage of time interstitial glucose is spent between 3.9 to 10 mmol/L for the entire intervention period. Secondary endpoints include diabetes-related quality of life, distress, and sleep quality in participants and their partners. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide clinical trial data regarding smart watch integrated DIY-CGM versus isCGM for improving glycaemic control in adults with T1D, and also report a variety of key secondary outcomes, including changes in subjective outcome measures for both people with diabetes and their partners. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000648820,31 May 2021); World Health Organisation International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (U1111-1262-2784, 3rd December 2020).

Hickam's dictum: Myasthenia Gravis presenting concurrently with Graves' disease.

We present two patients with Graves' disease and concurrent myasthenia gravis. The impact of the dual diagnosis on the clinical course and the potential for a delayed diagnosis of myasthenia gravis is discussed. Patient 1, a 28-year-old man was diagnosed with Graves' disease following his second respiratory arrest. His history was strongly suggestive of a second pathology. Patient 2, a 66-year-old Cantonese woman with established Graves' disease presented with thionamide-related neutropaenia. Examination revealed bilateral ptosis and right lateral rectus palsy. Both patients had thyrotoxicosis secondary to Graves' disease with concurrent myasthenia gravis. Although neuromuscular weakness is common in Graves' disease, coexisting myasthenia gravis (MG) is rare and can cause profound morbidity. Ocular signs in both diseases may cause diagnostic confusion although ptosis suggests coexisting MG. In both cases, the thyrotoxicosis delayed the diagnosis of MG.

A Duodenal SDH-Deficient Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in a Patient With a Germline SDHB Mutation.

Context: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract arising from the interstitial cells of Cajal. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient GISTs are a unique class of GIST defined by loss of immunohistochemical expression of SDHB, indicating dysfunction of the mitochondrial complex 2; lack of driver mutations in KIT and PDGFRA; and distinctive morphologic features and natural history. To date, all reported SDH-deficient GISTs have arisen in the stomach. We report an SDH-deficient GIST arising in the gastrointestinal tract outside the stomach. Case description: A 29-year-old man with a germline SDHB mutation (p.Arg90*) presented with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Endoscopy identified a lesion in the second part of the duodenum, close to the distal common bile duct, consistent with a GIST. Endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging did not demonstrate metastatic or nodal disease. Open transduodenal excision was performed to remove the tumor. Histologic evaluation confirmed the clinical diagnosis of a GIST, with positive staining for DOG1 and KIT. The mitotic count was low (1 per 50 high-power fields). Immunohistochemistry for SDHB was negative in the presence of an internal control. SDHA expression was retained. No somatic mutations were identified in KIT (exons 9, 11, 13, and 17) or PDGFRA (exons 12, 14, and 18). The germline SDHB mutation and loss of heterozygosity were confirmed on molecular testing of the tumor. Conclusion: We describe an SDH-deficient GIST occurring outside of the stomach. This case indicates that SDH-deficient GISTs may also arise in the small intestine.

Factitious Graves' Disease Due to Biotin Immunoassay Interference-A Case and Review of the Literature.

CONTEXT: Biotin (vitamin B7) is an essential co-factor for four carboxylases involved in fatty acid metabolism, leucine degradation, and gluconeogenesis. The recommended daily intake (RDI) of biotin is approximately 30 µg per day. Low-moderate dose biotin is a common component of multivitamin preparations, and high-dose biotin (10 000 times RDI) has been reported to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis. Biotin is also a component of immunoassays, and supplementation may cause interference in both thyroid and non-thyroid immunoassays. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether biotin ingestion caused abnormal thyroid function tests (TFTs) in a patient through assay interference. DESIGN: We report a patient with biotin-associated abnormal TFTs and a systematic review of the literature. SETTING: A tertiary endocrine service in Hamilton, New Zealand. RESULTS: The patient had markedly abnormal TFTs that did not match the clinical context. After biotin cessation, TFTs normalized far more rapidly than possible given the half-life of T4, consistent with assay interference by biotin. Multiple other analytes also tested abnormal in the presence of biotin. CONCLUSION: Biotin ingested in moderate to high doses can cause immunoassay interference. Depending on the assay format, biotin interference can result in either falsely high or low values. Interference is not limited to thyroid tests and has the potential to affect a wide range of analytes. It is important for clinicians to be aware of this interaction to prevent misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment.

Starting insulin in type 2 diabetes: real-world outcomes after the first 12 months of insulin therapy in a new zealand cohort.

AIMS: Currently, there is no consensus on which form of insulin to use when initiating insulin in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Our aim was to compare glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) reduction, weight change and severe hypoglycemia rates during the first year after initiation of intermediate-acting insulin isophane, insulin glargine and pre-mixed insulin in patients with T2D. METHODS: Electronic clinical records of patients with T2D, starting insulin at a tertiary referral center in Auckland, New Zealand, from January 1 to December 31, 2012, were retrospectively evaluated. Primary outcomes were HbA1C reduction at 12 months and number of hospital admissions for hypoglycemia. RESULTS: Of 339 eligible patients, 273 (80.5%) started on intermediate insulin, 24 started on insulin glargine and 42 started on pre-mixed insulin. The mean HbA1C at insulin initiation was 89-95 mmol/mol, but had decreased at 12 months by 26.6 mmol/mol with insulin glargine, 23.4 mmol/mol with pre-mixed insulin and 16.6 mmol/mol with insulin isophane (p < 0.05 vs. baseline for all groups). Patients on insulin glargine were more likely to achieve the HbA1C target of <55 mmol/mol compared with patients on insulin isophane (16.7% vs. 4.8%; p = 0.04). Persistence rates were higher in patients initiated on pre-mixed insulin vs. insulin isophane (90.5% vs. 69.6%; p = 0.01). After controlling for confounding variables, glargine was more likely to achieve an HbA1C target of <55 (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: All insulin types caused a significant reduction in HbA1C, but very few met HbA1C targets. Insulin isophane was the most common type of insulin prescribed at initiation, with comparable outcomes to other types of insulin. More observational studies are needed to explore the possible impact of using other insulin types at initiation.