RESUMO
Background and objective Sepsis is a major health burden that leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and severity prediction using various scoring systems can reduce the mortality rate, particularly in developing nations. There are two aims of this study. One is to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and serum lactate levels in patients with sepsis to predict mortality. The other aim is to evaluate the relationship between the SOFA score and lactate so that we may be able to use lactate as a surrogate predictor of organ dysfunction and mortality in sepsis. Methods An observational prognostic accuracy study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Ranchi, Jharkhand, India, between 1 July 2021 and 1 October 2022. We selected 128 patients, calculated their SOFA and lactate levels, and divided them into survivors and non-survivors according to their outcomes after seven days of assessment. The SOFA score and serum lactate levels were assessed as predictors of mortality, and their correlation was studied. Results We observed a significant decreasing trend in the value of the mean SOFA, maximum SOFA, mean lactate, and maximum lactate among survivors, whereas an increasing trend for the same was observed in non-survivors. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed the best diagnostic accuracy of the mean lactate (area under the curve {AUC}=0.996, 95% confidence interval {CI}=0.964-1.00, p≤0.0001). The maximum lactate (AUC=0.987, 95% CI=0.949-0.999, p≤0.0001) and mean SOFA scores (AUC=0.986, 95% CI=0.948-0.999, p≤0.0001) were good at predicting the mortality in sepsis. A slightly lower diagnostic accuracy was found for the maximum SOFA score (AUC=0.969, 95% CI=0.923-0.992, p≤0.0001). There was a strong correlation between the mean lactate and the mean SOFA with a correlation coefficient of 0.883 and p=0.0001. A good correlation was found between maximum lactate and maximum SOFA too (correlation coefficient=0.873, p≤0.0001). Conclusion This study highlights the different predictors of mortality in the patients with sepsis. The maximum lactate was the most accurate in predicting mortality in sepsis. It also demonstrates how serum lactate, due to its strong correlation with the SOFA score, can be used in its place to predict mortality in sepsis and organ dysfunction.
RESUMO
A lipase/amylase (L/A) ratio of more than three may be a tool for differentiating alcoholic pancreatitis from non-alcoholic pancreatitis. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify published studies. A thorough data search of various databases was conducted using keywords. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 survey. Data were extracted under the following headings: country, sample size, baseline characteristics, specificity, and sensitivity of the L/A ratio. Studies were analyzed using a bivariate random-effects model, and the sensitivity and specificity of the L/A ratio were pooled separately. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were plotted using the hierarchical method. A total of nine studies with 1,825 patients were identified for inclusion. SROC showed estimates of the area under the curve to be 0.75 (confidence interval (CI) = 0.71-0.79). Forest plots for sensitivity and specificity showed pooled estimates of sensitivity to be 74% (95% CI = 62-83%) while that of specificity was 63% (95% CI = 47-77%). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was estimated to be 5 (95% CI = 3-9), the pooled positive likelihood ratio was estimated at 2.0, and the pooled negative likelihood ratio was estimated to be 0.41. We concluded that an L/A ratio of more than 3 has moderate accuracy for the diagnosis of alcoholic pancreatitis.
RESUMO
The development of an incisional hernia is a common complication of midline laparotomy. Improper fascial closure techniques have a significant role in its development. It can also lead to poor wound healing and increase the risk of developing surgical site infections (SSI). Upon conducting a thorough literature review, various studies have been conducted on closing abdominal wounds. However, there is a dearth of studies portraying the role of suture length in the prevention of incisional hernia and SSI. The effect of using a greater suture-to-wound length ratio on postoperative outcomes was not clearly analyzed or described. The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of using a suture length to wound length ratio ≥4:1 versus a ratio <4:1 in preventing postoperative complications such as incisional hernia and SSI. This study is a systematic review of randomized controlled trials on abdominal wound closure using a suture length to wound length ratio of ≥4:1 and <4:1. published in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. The relevant studies identified from 1991 to 2017, were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of incisional hernia, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of SSI. This meta-analysis considered five randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of using different suture length to wound length ratios during abdominal closure on incisional hernia and SSI. Participants ranged in size from 100 to 363. The trial follow-up period ranged from a minimum of 10 months to five years. The outcomes studied in the two groups were incisional hernia and SSI. The relative risk of the occurrence of incisional hernia if the suture length to wound length ratio was ≥4:1 was 0.42 with a p-value of <0.001 which was considered significant. This implied that using a suture length of more than four times that of the wound i.e., 4:1, significantly decreases the risk of developing an incisional hernia by more than half. The relative risk of developing a SSI was 0.98 with a p-value of 0.966. Thus, this method of abdominal closure uing a longer suture length to wound length ratio does not contribute to an increased incidence or significant change in the risk of developing SSI.
