UroVysion® predicts intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UCUUT) is common. One of the mechanisms driving this is the implantation of cancer cells from the UCUUT at the RNUs. Therefore, their detection after RNU can assist in predicting IVR. This study aimed to examine the utility of UroVysion® as a tool for predicting bladder recurrence after RNU for UCUUT. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 65 patients who received RNU for high-grade UCUUT between October 2013 and April 2017. RESULTS: Of the 65 patients, 54 (83.1%) who had both bladder urine samples available immediately after RNU (0 postoperative days: POD) and 5 days after RNU (5POD) were selected. We performed UroVysion® and cytology. Twenty-two patients showed IVR with 32 foci. UroVysion® results at 0POD (26 patients, 48.1%) and/or 5POD (31 patients, 57.4%) were positive in 42 (77.8%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of UroVysion® for included cases were measured for both 0POD and 5POD samples; they were determined to be 95.5% (21/22), 34.4% (11/32), 50.0% (21/42), and 91.7% (11/12), respectively. For cytology, these values were 75.0% (15/20), 52.9% (18/34), 48.4% (15/31), and 78.3% (18/23), respectively. Forty-two (64.6%) patients who were UroVysion®-positive demonstrated IVR. The IVR rate between the group positive for either 0POD or 5POD and that negative for both significantly differed for both UroVysion® (p = 0.019) and cytology (p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Multiple urine tests using UroVysion® after RNU could be a useful predictor for IVR.

Diagnostic Utility of UroVysion Combined With Conventional Urinary Cytology for Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract.

OBJECTIVES: We prospectively evaluated the utility of UroVysion in urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract (UCUUTs). METHODS: Ninety patients who received nephroureterectomy for UCUUT were enrolled. We performed urinary cytology and UroVysion before nephroureterectomy. We also performed the assays on 23 volunteers without a history of urothelial carcinoma. RESULTS: Seventy-five high-grade urothelial carcinomas (HGUCs), 10 low-grade urothelial carcinomas, and five other conditions were enrolled. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for HGUC detection by urinary cytology were 28.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 31.6%, respectively; for detection by fluorescence in situ hybridization, these values were 60.0%, 84.0%, 93.8%, and 41.2%, respectively. UroVysion detected the only deletion of 9p21 in eight of 23 samples negative for HGUC by urinary cytology and in three of 23 volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: Combining urinary cytology and UroVysion can improve the diagnostic accuracy of UCUUT. Caution is advised in diagnosing UCUUT based only on deletion of 9p21.