[Thermal injuries in the OEAMTC air rescue service. Epidemiological characteristics of burns/scalds in children and adults]. / Thermische Verletzungen in der ÖAMTC-Luftrettung. Einsatzcharakteristika bei Verbrennungen/Verbrühungen von Kindern und Erwachsenen.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist on the epidemiological characteristics of thermal injuries in prehospital emergency care, especially in the context of air rescue. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the epidemiology of pediatric and adult thermal injuries in the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) run by the Austrian Automobile Motorcycle Touring Club (OEAMTC) air rescue service from an almost nationwide sample. METHODS: All OEAMTC-HEMS rescue missions flown for thermal injuries in 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary (n=88) and secondary missions (n=17) were collated and all primary missions were analyzed in detail. RESULTS: In total 71 out of 16,100 (0.4 %) primary HEMS rescue missions were for patients suffering from burns or scalds (children n=27, adults n=44). The proportion of major burns (burns covering >20 % of the total body surface area) was 40.7 % in children and 54.5 % in adults, 44 (62 %) burn/scald injuries were related to the head/neck, 37 (52.1 %) to the upper limbs and 10 (14.1 %) to the anogenital region. More than half of the victims (63.4%) suffered potentially life-threatening injury. CONCLUSIONS: In HEMS thermal injuries are infrequent but mostly life-threatening. Differences in epidemiological characteristics of pediatric and adult burns/scalds may have important operational, training and public health implications.

The epidemiology of amputation injuries in the Austrian helicopter emergency medical service: a retrospective, nationwide cohort study.

PURPOSE: Data on the epidemiological characteristics of traumatic amputations in prehospital emergency care, especially in the context of air rescue, are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to describe the epidemiology of total and subtotal amputation injuries encountered by the OEAMTC helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) in Austria, based on an almost nationwide sample. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all HEMS rescue missions flown for amputation injuries in 2009. Only primary missions were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 149 out of 16,100 (0.9 %) primary HEMS rescue missions were for patients suffering from amputation injuries. Among these, HEMS physicians diagnosed 63.3 % (n = 94) total and 36.9 % (n = 55) subtotal amputations, with both groups showing a predominance of male victims (male:female ratios were 8:1 and 6:1, respectively).The highest rate occurred among adults between 45 and 64 years of age (35.6 %, n = 53). The most common causes were working with a circular saw (28.9 %, n = 43) and processing wood (16.8 %, n = 25). The majority of the cases included digital amputation injuries (77.2 %, n = 115) that were mainly related to the index finger (36.2 %, n = 54). One hundred forty patients (94.0 %) showed a total GCS of more than 12. Amputations were most prevalent in rural areas (84.6 %, n = 126) and between Thursday and Saturday (55.0 %, n = 82). The replantation rate after primary air transport was low (28 %). CONCLUSIONS: In the HEMS, amputation injuries are infrequent and mostly not life-threatening. However, HEMS crews need to maintain their focus on providing sufficient and fast primary care while facilitating rapid transport to a specialized hospital. The knowledge of the epidemiological characteristics of amputation injuries encountered in the HEMS gained in this study may be useful for educational and operational purposes.

Evaluation of the online-presence (homepage) of burn units/burn centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

PURPOSE: A successful online presence is an important key factor in the competition among hospitals today. However, little is known about the internet presence and the quality of websites of burn units on the World Wide Web. The aim was to assess the online presence of hospitals provided by specialized burn units in German speaking countries with a focus on the rate and the performance of actively run websites. METHODS: A multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study was performed over a period of 1.5 month (October-December 2010). Forty-four burn units were assessed by using a previously generated criteria list. The list included 36 criteria with following topics: "research and teaching"; "patient care"; "clinical emphases", "general information"; "information brokerage". RESULTS: Overall, the websites examined offered a good overview about their different online services with many multimedia-based elements included. All websites consisted of hyperlinks, general multimedia-based elements and information on means of communication with the hospital, respectively. In contrast, the quality of specific information for burn patients was relatively poor. With regard to the need of elderly people, the usability and the layout, the different websites offer a lot of options for future improvements. CONCLUSION: Burn centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland already consider the World Wide Web as an important tool for self-promotion and communication. The potential of burn center websites to function as a knowledge base for first aid as well as preventive measurements should be considered and realized in future web site designs.

The use of Suprathel(®) in deep dermal burns: first results of a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: While autologous skin grafting has been the standard for coverage of full-thickness areas, several options for deep-partial-thickness defects exist. With regard to economising donor sites, we compared a copolymer based on DL-lactid acid (Suprathel(®)) as temporary wound dressing with autologous skin, and analysed time to healing and scar quality in matched areas of deep-partial-thickness burn. METHODS: We recruited 18 patients with a median age of 45 years (range: 25-83 years), for this prospective, non-blinded controlled non-inferiority study, suffering from deep-partial-thickness burns from November 2009 to July 2010. After early tangential excision, matched deep-partial-thickness areas were covered with 1:1.5 meshed autologous skin grafts and the copolymer for direct intra-individual comparison. Scars were evaluated by means of the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and suction cutometry (MPA 580, Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) on days 30 and 90, postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifteen days after surgery, complete wound closure was present in 44.4% (8/18) of all areas covered with copolymer and 88.9% (16/18) in the split-thickness skin graft (STSG) area (p=0.008). Evaluation of the total VSS, POSAS and cutometry satisfied the criterion of non-inferiority for Suprathel(®) on day 30. Ninety days after surgery, only the Observer Scar Scale showed that Suprathel is non-inferior to STSG, albeit the mean total VSS and Patient Scar Scale were better in Suprathel(®) areas. CONCLUSION: Suprathel(®) represents a solid, reliable epidermal skin substitute with longer healing times in comparison to skin grafts but comparable results concerning early scar formation. Suprathel(®) can serve as a tool in treatment portfolio for adult patients suffering from deep dermal burns. Especially in patients with extensive burns, Suprathel(®) can be used to cover the deep dermal burn wounds to save STSGs and its donor sites for the coverage of full-thickness burned areas.