Minimizing Redislocation Rates and Restoring Function After Patella Dislocation: A Critically Appraised Topic.

CLINICAL SCENARIO: Patella dislocation is a common knee injury resulting in decreased function, increased knee pain, and a higher risk of recurrent patella dislocation. Patients with patella instability are treated surgically or conservatively with physical therapy to minimize redislocation risk and restore function. CLINICAL QUESTION: In individuals with a patella dislocation, how does treatment (conservative therapy versus medial patellofemoral ligament [MPFL] surgery) affect redislocation rates and patient-perceived function? SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS: This critically appraised topic included 3 studies assessing outcomes in individuals with patella instability treated with MPFL surgery or conservative management. Outcomes included comparing redislocation rates and Kujala scale perceived knee function between participant groups. Surgery included MPFL reconstruction (MPFL-R) in 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 prospective controlled trial and MPFL repair in another randomized controlled trial. Conservative treatment included physical therapy and bracing. All 3 studies demonstrated significantly lower redislocation rates in individuals managed with surgery versus conservative treatment. Reported knee function was significantly higher in the MPFL-R group compared with individuals conservatively managed at 2-year follow-up but not at 1 year. No significant difference in knee function was present between individuals receiving MPFL repair or conservative management at a 2-year follow-up. CLINICAL BOTTOM LINE: There is moderate-level evidence to support a significant decrease in patella redislocation rates in individuals managed with MPFL surgery compared with conservative treatment. The reviewed studies suggest a significant improvement in patient-perceived knee function at 2 years following MPFL-R but no difference at 1 year following MPFL-R or 2 years after MPFL repair. Strength of Recommendations: Grade B evidence supports lower patella redislocation rates with MPFL surgery compared with nonsurgical treatment. Furthermore, this evidence suggests a potential benefit in perceived knee function 2 years after MPFL-R compared with conservative management.

Distal Adductor Magnus Avulsion Fracture Treated with Excision After Failure of Nonoperative Management: A Case Report.

CASE: In this case report, we discuss a skeletally immature gymnast who presented with an isolated distal femoral adductor tubercle avulsion fracture that went on to develop a painful nonunion. After the failure of extensive nonoperative intervention, she had resolution of her symptoms with bony excision and soft-tissue repair. CONCLUSION: It is important for clinicians to be aware of this atypical injury pattern and that surgical intervention may be necessary because conservative treatment may not always resolve symptoms.

REHABILITATION FOLLOWING ISOLATED POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW OF PUBLISHED PROTOCOLS.

BACKGROUND: Surgical outcomes following isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) have been noted to be less satisfactory than the anterior cruciate ligament. Limited understanding of optimal rehabilitation has been implicated as a contributing factor. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this review was to gather the literature related to isolated PCLR rehabilitation, extract and summarize current rehabilitation guidelines, identify timeframes and functional measurements associated with common rehabilitation topics and provide recommendations for future research. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. METHODS: A literature review was performed for scientific publications that include a detailed rehabilitation program following isolated PCLR, published between January 2005 and March 2018. Data related to weight-bearing, knee range of motion (ROM), brace usage, specific exercise recommendations and suggestions for return to running and sport activities were extracted and categorized. RESULTS: A total of 44 articles met inclusion criteria. Post-operative weight-bearing was discussed in 35 articles with recommendations ranging from no restriction to 12 weeks of limitations. Forty-two articles recommended the use of immediate post-operative bracing, the majority of which positioned the knee in full extension, with duration of use ranging from one to 12 weeks post-operatively. Although 30 articles offered detailed descriptions of ROM activity, there was significant variability in timing of initiation, angular excursion and progression of range of motion. Suggested timeframes for returning to sports activity ranged from four to 12 months, with only four articles providing specific objective strength or functional performance criteria necessary for progression. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variation in nearly all aspects of published descriptors of rehabilitation following isolated PCLR. Most protocols are based upon biomechanical principles and clinical expertise, relying solely on timeframe from surgery to support rehabilitation decision making. Evidence to compare patient outcomes with specific loading, ROM progression and exercise strategies is currently lacking. Only a small number of protocols incorporate the use of specific objective performance goals to facilitate return to sport decision making.