Anxiety sensitivity and COVID-19 mental health, fatigue, and well-being: a longitudinal examination among adults from the United States during March-October 2020.

There is widespread empirical evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to elevated risk of mental and physical health symptoms and decreased quality of life. The present investigation sought to examine if individual differences in anxiety sensitivity was associated with mental health, psychosomatic, and well-being among a sample of US adults during a 6-month period early in the COVID-19 pandemic. Employing longitudinal research methodology, we tested the hypothesis that the anxiety sensitivity global factor would be related to increased risk of anxiety, depression, fatigue, and lower well-being. Secondary analyses evaluated the lower order anxiety sensitivity factors for the same criterion variables. The sample consisted of 778 participants with an average age of 37.96 (SD = 11.81; range 18-73). Results indicated that, as hypothesized, anxiety sensitivity was associated with increased risk for more severe anxiety, depression, fatigue, and lesser well-being; the observed effects of anxiety sensitivity were relatively robust and evident in adjusted models that controlled for numerous theoretically and clinically relevant factors (e.g. perceived health status). Overall, these results suggest that pandemic functioning could likely be improved via interventions that target elevated anxiety sensitivity as a vulnerability factor for a broad range of aversive psychosomatic symptoms and personal well-being.

The unique effects of hope and gratitude on psychological distress and well-being in trauma-exposed Hispanic/Latino adults.

OBJECTIVE: Gratitude and hope are well-established predictors of well-being and buffers against posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and anxiety symptoms. However, scarce literature exists that investigates these relationships in a Hispanic/Latino sample. The current study investigates gratitude's and hope's relationship to PTSD and anxiety symptoms and different domains of well-being in trauma-exposed Hispanic/Latino young adults at a large southern university. METHOD: The sample was composed of 732 undergraduate students who were mostly female (80.7%) and young adults, (Mage = 21.8, SD = 4.3), who endorsed experiencing one or more traumatic events via the Life Events Checklist. Students completed an online survey for course credit. RESULTS: Structural equation models were used to analyze the data. Gratitude had a stronger inverse relationship with PTSD symptoms (ß = -.43, 95% CI [-0.50, -0.35]) and anxiety symptoms (ß = -.28, 95% CI [-0.36, -0.20]) compared to hope (ß = .06, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.14]) (ß = -.06, 95% CI [-0.14, 0.02]). Both gratitude and hope were robust predictors of the three domains of well-being. CONCLUSIONS: The current study found that hope and gratitude predicted resilience in trauma-exposed Hispanic/Latino young adults. Decreased levels of gratitude were a stronger predictor of psychological distress and subjective well-being than decreased levels of hope, but hope was a robust predictor of the three well-being domains. The findings of this study may lend support for the development of hope and gratitude interventions in a Hispanic/Latino population for the prevention of PTSD symptoms and anxiety symptoms via engendering higher levels of resilience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

The Role of Coping and Posttraumatic Stress in Fostering Posttraumatic Growth and Quality of Life Among Women with Breast Cancer.

Tedeschi & Calhoun's model of posttraumatic growth (PTG) suggests that intrusive thoughts about a traumatic event, in combination with helpful coping strategies, facilitates PTG. This manuscript applies this model to a sample of breast cancer survivors, augments it to conceptualize coping strategies as "active" or "avoidant," and extends it to include health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This is a secondary analysis of a subset of breast cancer patients (N = 123) in a randomized clinical trial of Tibetan yoga, which examines the associations of coping at study entry with PTG, PTSS (i.e., intrusive thoughts and avoidance), and HRQOL (physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scales) reported 9 and 15 months later. Mediation analyses revealed that higher baseline active coping predicted higher 9-month PTG, which in turn predicted higher 15-month PCS [effect = .46, 95% CI (.06, 1.07)]. Exploratory moderated mediation analyses revealed that higher baseline intrusive thoughts about cancer predicted lower 9-month PTG, which in turn predicted lower 15-month PCS, but only for those reporting low active coping [effect = - .06, 95% CI (- .16, - .003)]. Active coping may play a critical role of fostering PTG and improving subsequent HRQOL in the presence of rumination about cancer.

Associations of resilience and hope with mental and physical health among firefighters.

OBJECTIVE: Firefighters represent an understudied population with high rates of chronic exposure to stress and potentially traumatic events. Thus, there is a need to identify modifiable resilience factors to address posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (PTSD) and chronic pain in firefighters to inform prevention and intervention efforts. METHODS: The current sample included 155 firefighters (93.5% male; Mage = 42.2, SD = 9.8) recruited online from career, volunteer, and combination (i.e., volunteer and career) departments in a large metropolitan area in the southern United States. RESULTS: Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to investigate the associations between/among resilience and hope on PTSD symptoms, chronic pain, well-being, and posttraumatic growth (PTG). Resilience had a stronger, negative relationship with PTSD and chronic pain compared to hope, while hope had a stronger, positive relationship with PTG and well-being compared to resilience. Hope and resilience combined predicted 10%-33% of the variance in the outcomes. CONCLUSION: The current findings may provide evidence to promote interventions that increase resilience and hope in firefighters.

Hope's relationship with resilience and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected individuals financially, physically, and mentally during the past couple of years. Recent research has indicated that mental health concerns such as stress, anxiety, and depression have been on the rise due to the pandemic and its consequences. Fortunately, resilience factors such as hope have also been examined in the midst of the pandemic. Hope has been found to be a buffer against stress, anxiety, and depression over time during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hope has also been associated with positive outcomes such as posttraumatic growth and well-being. These results have been investigated in populations particularly affected by the pandemic such as healthcare professionals and patients with chronic illness and cross-culturally.

Anxiety sensitivity and reasons for smoking among Black smokers.

Black smokers demonstrate higher nicotine dependence and experience higher rates of smoking-related diseases and mortality relative to European American/White smokers. A potential factor relevant to race-specific smoking health disparities may be smoking motives (i.e., motivational basis of smoking). Yet, little research has been conducted to understand psychological factors that may be associated with specific smoking motives among Black smokers. To address this gap in the literature, the current study explored the association between anxiety sensitivity and smoking motives within a subset sample of Black smokers who were interested in participating in a smoking cessation trial (N = 105; 70.5 % male; Mage = 44.8 years, SD = 11.6 years). Hierarchical regression analyses indicated anxiety sensitivity was associated with smoking motives related to habit (ß = 0.39, p <.001), negative affect reduction (ß = 0.32, p <.001), stimulation (ß = 0.31, p <.001), and sensorimotor manipulation (ß = 0.26, p =.008). Limited support was found for the effect of motives on past quit attempt engagement. These results may broaden understanding of the psychological mechanisms related to smoking motivation among Black smokers and may inform future intervention efforts to reduce smoking motivation among this health disparities population.

Personality and city culture predict attitudes and practices toward mosquitoes and mosquito-borne diseases in South Texas.

Personality is known to affect compliance with health-protective behaviors and it has been shown that effective public health messaging can be informed by an understanding of that relationship. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the role personality might play in implementing personal protective measures (PPMs) that can prevent mosquito-borne diseases. This is the first mosquito-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) study to incorporate a measure of personality using the Big Five: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. KAP studies in Gulf-coast and Mexican border-states in the U.S. are few. Ours is only the second KAP study to take place in Texas despite known local transmission and established mosquito populations capable of transmitting dengue, zika, chikungunya, and West Nile viruses. The KAP survey was administered in three neighborhoods in San Antonio, a large, Hispanic-majority, urban city that is segregated economically and ecologically. We found that openness, agreeableness, and extraversion predicted certain attitudes and PPMs, and that KAP and personality measures did not differ along ethnic or neighborhood lines. Perceptions toward the city's role in mosquito control and education was an important factor in predicting PPMs, suggesting that city culture (attitudes common throughout the city as opposed to attitudes differing by ethnicity and neighborhood) may be most salient in developing public health messaging in San Antonio.

Potentially morally injurious events as a mediator of the association of gratitude and mindfulness with distress.

OBJECTIVE: Potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) are events that contradict one's own personal ethics and may promote a deep sense of violation, leading to psychological distress. Individuals with greater trait gratitude and mindfulness may be less likely to perceive events as being morally injurious and may, in turn, be less likely to experience subsequent distress. The current study seeks to examine (a) PMIE rates in a multioccupational first responder sample and (b) the indirect effect of trait gratitude and mindfulness on psychological distress via fewer perceived PMIEs. METHOD: 293 first responders from agencies/departments within southeastern Texas (in-person) and nationwide (online) completed a survey assessing PMIEs, PTSD symptoms (PCL-C), anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-8), gratitude (GRAT-S), and mindfulness (MAAS). RESULTS: PMIEs were common (61% witnessed a transgression; 21% committed a transgression; 40% felt betrayed by others). Gratitude was indirectly associated with fewer PTSD [-.09, 95% CI (-.13, -.05)], anxiety [-.03, 95% CI (-.04, -.01)], and depression [-.03, 95% CI (-.05, -.01)] symptoms via lower PMIEs. Similarly, mindfulness was indirectly associated with fewer PTSD [-.92, 95% CI (-1.55, -.38)], anxiety [-.20, 95% CI (-.42, .02)], and depression [-.26, 95% CI (-.48, -.06)] symptoms via lower PMIEs. CONCLUSIONS: PMIEs were common in this first responder sample and associated with increased distress. Trait gratitude and mindfulness may protect first responders from perceiving events as morally injurious, which may lead to improved mental health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

A little shot of humility: Intellectual humility predicts vaccination attitudes and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19.

Vaccinations remain a critical, albeit surprisingly controversial, health behavior, especially with the promise of widely available COVID-19 vaccine. Intellectual humility, a virtue characterized by nonjudgmental recognition of one's own intellectual fallibility, may counter rigidity associated with anti-vaccination attitudes and help promote vaccine-related behaviors. This study investigated whether intellectual humility is related to anti-vaccination attitudes and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19, and whether intellectual humility can predict unique variance in these outcomes beyond participant demographic and personal factors. Participants (N = 351, 57.23% male, mean age = 37.41 years, SD = 11.51) completed a multidimensional measure for intellectual humility, the anti-vaccination attitudes (VAX) scale, and a two-item COVID-19 vaccination intention scale. Bivariate correlations demonstrated that intellectual humility was negatively related with anti-vaccination attitudes overall, r(349) = -.46, p < .001, and positively related to intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19, r(349) = .20, p < .001. Hierarchical multiple regression revealed that intellectual humility predicted all four types anti-vaccination attitudes, overall anti-vaccination attitudes, and COVID-19 vaccination intentions above and beyond demographic and personal factors (i.e., sex, race/ethnicity, age, education, socioeconomic status, and political orientation), ΔR 2 between .08 and .18, ps < .001. These results bolster intellectual humility as a malleable psychological factor to consider in efforts to combat anti-vaccination attitudes and promote COVID-19 vaccination uptake.

Intellectual humility's association with vaccine attitudes and intentions.

Vaccinations are critical to public health but uptake levels remain suboptimal. Intellectual humility, a virtue characterized by nonjudgmental recognition of one's own intellectual fallibility, may support the promotion of favorable vaccine attitudes. The current study investigated whether intellectual humility is related to anti-vaccination attitudes and intentions to vaccinate against the flu. Through an online survey management system, participants (N = 246, Mage = 39.06 years, SDage = 10.57, 50.80% female, 79.20% White, 6.50% Black/African American, 7.80% Asian, 1.20% Hispanic/Latino, and 5.30% Other) completed a measure for intellectual humility, the anti-vaccination attitudes (VAX) scale, and a three-item flu vaccine intention scale. We found that intellectual humility negatively correlated with anti-vaccination attitudes. This correlation was largely driven by openness to revising one's viewpoint and lack of intellectual overconfidence. Additionally, we found that intellectual humility did not relate to flu vaccination intentions. Finally, we discuss the implications of these findings and their potential to support the eventual development of strategies to leverage intellectual humility into a health promotion strategy.