Improving Emergency Medicine Clinician Awareness of Prehospital-Administered Medications.

Background/problem: Information transfer between emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency medicine (EM) is at high risk for omissions and errors. EM awareness of prehospital medication administration affects patient management and medication error. In April 2020, we surveyed emergency physicians and emergency department nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) regarding the EMS handoff process. Emergency physicians and NPs/PAs endorsed knowing what medications were given, or having received direct verbal handoff from EMS "Often" or "Always" only 20% of the time (n = 71), identifying a need to improve the written handoff process. To assess rates of medication error due to lack of awareness of prehospital administered medications, we measured glucocorticoid redosing in the emergency department (ED) following prehospital dexamethasone administration. In 2020, glucocorticoids were redosed 30% of the time, and our aim was to reduce glucocorticoid redosing to 10% by June 2022. Intervention: We developed and implemented a system innovation where prehospital-administered medications documented in a nursing flowsheet during verbal handoff are pulled directly into the triage note where they are more likely to be reviewed by receiving EM clinicians. Results: Shewhart p-charts were used to evaluate for statistical process change in the process measure of triage note documentation of prehospital medication administration and the outcome measure of glucocorticoid redosing. While the frequency of prehospital dexamethasone administration in the triage note increased, no statistical process change outcome measure of glucocorticoid redosing was observed. However, on repeat survey of EM clinicians in July 2022, 50% now indicated they were aware of prehospital medication administration "Often" or "Always" (n = 61, p = 0.003), 87% maintained they use the triage note as the main source of information regarding prehospital medication administration, and 81% "Always" review the triage note. Conclusions: Innovations that improve accessibility of written documentation of prehospital medication administration were associated with improved subjective assessment of EM clinician awareness of prehospital medications, but not the outcome measure of medication error. Effective error reduction likely requires better system integration between prehospital and EM records.

Accuracy of Intravenous Infusion Flow Regulators in the Prehospital Environment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of multiple Intravenous Infusion Flow Regulators (IIFRs) at infusion rates and hanging heights common to the prehospital setting. METHODS: Five different manufacturer's IIFRs were tested over a range of infusion rates while hanging at heights equivalent to the gurney pole, ambulance ceiling hook, and manufacturer's recommended height (if available). Each IIFR was run over a 15-minute period at each infusion rate and height three times. Drip effluent was collected and measured for comparison of volumes. Intra- and inter-device accuracy at different infusion rates and heights was calculated. RESULTS: All devices deviated from the expected infusion volume regardless of infusion rate or height. There was inter-device variability across all IIFRs with some having reproducible though inaccurate volumes. Volumes were consistently below expected at lower heights and above expected at increased heights. Manufacturer recommended height guidelines provided slight improvements in accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Significant deviations from expected IIFR volume were observed across all devices, flow rates, and heights in a static, laboratory environment. These findings would lend caution to the use of IIFRs as they could lead to inaccurate medication dosing (both over- or under-dosing) in the prehospital environment.