State of the nation survey on cataract surgery in India.

Purpose: To study the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the ophthalmologists in India regarding cataract extraction practices. Methods: A prospective, online, descriptive study was conducted from January 2022 to April 2022 using a self-developed validated questionnaire attached which was administered through a generated link. Results: The mean age of these 153 respondents was 47.02 (SD = 11.53) years with a male preponderance (70.59%). The majority (52.9%) had completed a fellowship after their post-graduation, and 56.20% provided sub-specialty services. Comprehensive ophthalmology (69.93%) and anterior segment (50.32%) practice were the most popular. Although 76.47% of respondents used a mix of techniques, 11.11% surgeons used only phaco-emulsification and 9.8% used only manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) as the lone cataract treatment modality. Roughly 38% felt that outcomes were comparable for phaco-emulsification and MSICS, whereas about 44% opined that the outcomes of phaco-emulsification were better. MSICS outcomes were reported to be better by approximately 15%. The frown incision (53.59%), the straight incision (19.60%), and the straight incision with back cuts (10.45%) were popular. The majority (71.24%) of the respondents were willing to train fellow ophthalmologists and youngsters in MSICS. Standalone practices and family practices (42.48%), private eye institutes (10.45%), medical colleges (12.41%), and government non-teaching hospitals (11.11%) were the major service providers. 4% were working in rural hinterland. Conclusion: The majority of the surgeons use a mix of cataract extraction operative techniques. A large, willing talent pool of manual small-incision cataract surgeons exists. India can be a global hub for MSICS delivery and training.

Magnitude and Determinants of Diabetic Retinopathy Among Indian Diabetic Patients Undergoing Telescreening in India.

Purpose: To determine the magnitude, determinants, and public health issues related to diabetic retinopathy (DR) in India using 2019 data from a for-profit telescreening program. Methods: Digital retinal images were captured using a nonmydriatic fundus camera and transferred via the telescreening program to a reading center. Ophthalmologists trained in DR image reading created the DR status reports. Age/sex-adjusted rates of DR, sight-threatening DR (STDR), and diabetic macular edema (DME) were calculated and correlated with known risk factors. Results: Images of 51,760 Indian diabetic patients (103,520 eyes) were reviewed. The prevalence of DR, STDR, and DME was 19.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.9-19.5), 5.1% (95% CI: 4.9-5.3), and 3.9% (95% CI: 3.7-4.1), respectively. Based on these data, we projected 14.7 million cases of DR, 3.9 million with STDR, and 3.0 million DME cases in India. Statistically significant risk factors for DR were male gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.19, p < 0.001), older age (χ2 = 270, df = 3, p < 0.001), history of cataract surgery (OR = 2.0, p < 0.001), longer duration of diabetes (χ2 = 1084, p < 0.001), and type 1 diabetes (OR = 3.9, p = 0.01). There was a statistically significant variation of DR by geographic zones (χ2 = 310, p < 0.001). Laser treatment coverage for STDR was 22%. Duration of diabetes (p < 0.001), cataract surgery in the past (p = 0.02), and females (p = 0.001) were predictors of STDR. Conclusion: This model of telescreening for DR provides an additional pathway for screening and preventing diabetes-related visual morbidity in India. The data from this study can be used for epidemiologic and ophthalmic health policies related to diabetes.