Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for treating single-level spondylolisthesis at L4-L5. METHODS: The patients underwent minimally invasive LLIF (n = 18), minimally invasive TLIF (n = 17), and conventional open PLIF (n = 20) for spondylolisthesis at L4-L5. Reduction of slippage, improvement in segmental lordosis, and restoration of foraminal height were measured. Perioperative parameters such as blood loss and operation time and clinical outcomes such as visual analog scale score and Oswestry Disability Index were compared. RESULTS: Compared with the open PLIF group, the minimally invasive LLIF group showed greater restoration of mean foraminal height, significantly smaller mean intraoperative estimated blood loss, and less mean hemoglobin reduction on the third day postoperatively. Compared with the minimally invasive TLIF group, the minimally invasive LLIF group showed greater restoration of mean segmental lordosis. The minimally invasive LLIF group showed a significantly shorter mean time to start walking after surgery compared with the conventional open PLIF and minimally invasive TLIF groups. However, compared with the minimally invasive TLIF group, the minimally invasive LLIF group showed a significantly longer mean operating time. Clinical outcomes were not statistically different among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of spondylolisthesis of L4-L5, minimally invasive LLIF provided an effective surgical alternative to minimally invasive TLIF or conventional open PLIF, with the advantages of less blood loss, the faster start of postoperative walking, and comparable improvement in radiologic parameters.

A potential risk factor of total knee arthroplasty: an infected Baker's cyst - a case report.

BACKGROUND: In adults, Baker's cyst development is attributable principally to secondary alterations after degenerative changes. The latter changes often accompany osteoarthritis, and we frequently encounter patients with Baker's cysts seeking total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Baker's cysts are not usually subject to extensive preoperative evaluation because the cysts often disappear naturally after surgery, unaccompanied by any adverse symptoms. CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old woman presented with moderate pain in the left knee joint that had developed 1 year ago. Posterior knee pain was aggravated on maximum knee flexion. Three months previously, a popliteal mass had become palpable and the patient had undergone needle mass aspiration twice in a local orthopedic hospital, but the mass had recurred. We initially considered TKA for her severe degenerative osteoarthritis. However, we decided to perform only arthroscopic debridement and cyst excision because the patient was experienced severe pain only on maximal knee flexion, and did not want TKA. Pus gushed from the torn cyst during the operation. We diagnosed an infected Baker's cyst. The patient was treated with a first-generation cephalosporin postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: A Baker's cyst that was aspirated and still causes symptoms with altered blood tests needs to be evaluated accurately before TKA.