RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers for volume augmentation in the anteromedial malar region of Asians have been popular for many years. However, studies on their long-term effectiveness are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HA fillers injected into the anteromedial malar region for volume augmentation for up to 52 weeks. METHODS: Each anteromedial malar region of the subjects was treated with YVOIRE Contour (YVOC) in one side and Restylane Sub-Q (RESS) in the other and followed up at weeks 2, 14, 26, and 52. The volume using the mid-face aesthetic scale (MFAS) ranging from 0 (full) to 4 (very severely sunken) and the subject's satisfaction and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: Total 83 subjects were randomized and treated with YVOC and RESS. The LS means (standard error) of MFAS score in the YVOC and RESS groups were both 2.56 (0.05) at baseline, 1.32 (0.07) and 1.39 (0.07) at week 26, and 1.84 (0.10) and 1.89 (0.10) at week 52, respectively. The difference in the LS mean of MFAS score between the groups at week 26 was 0.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.12), showing the non-inferiority of YVOC to RESS. About 70% of subjects were still satisfied with the results at week 52. No specific safety concern was detected. CONCLUSIONS: The HA fillers injected for the anteromedial malar augmentation maintained the volume well for up to 52 weeks. Additionally, both YVOC and RESS show similar effectiveness and safety profiles.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin type A remains the most popular nonsurgical aesthetic treatment worldwide. Previous consensus statements have focused on Caucasians and on Koreans as generally representative of Asians. However, indications and dosages vary among different ethnic groups. This publication reports the results of a multidisciplinary, pan-Asian consensus focusing on incobotulinumtoxinA. METHODS: A consensus group of plastic surgeons and dermatologists from Asia, Europe, and the United States convened for a live meeting in Asia, followed by a questionnaire-based Delphi procedure. Treatment of Asians in both their native countries and countries of migration was discussed. RESULTS: For most items, the group achieved a majority consensus. A number of treatment indications, strategies, and dosages were identified in Asians, which are distinct to those previously described for Caucasians due to differences in facial morphotypes, anatomy, and cultural expectations. The group also formulated position statements for intradermal botulinum toxin type A ("mesotoxin"), body shaping with the calves as a paradigm, and reduction of parotid glands. While Asians have previously been considered a homogeneous group for the purposes of aesthetic treatment, this publication considers regional variations. A new classification of Asian facial morphotypes is proposed to aid treatment planning and implementation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first pan-Asian consensus for aesthetic use of botulinum toxin type A. Its unique objective is to optimize treatment safety and efficacy for patients of complete or part-Asian ancestry in all regions. The recommendations for incobotulinumtoxinA may be extended with care to other botulinum toxin formulations.
