Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Perit Dial Int ; 30(6): 652-6, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21148059

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis is a common and morbid complication of PD. Bacteria are able to create a biofilm on the PD catheter, which can be a source of recurrent infection. Biofilms undergo a phenotypic change resulting in increased antibiotic resistance. ♢ METHODS: 21 clinical isolates of different patients with PD peritonitis secondary to Staphylococcus aureus were collected. They were analyzed for their antibiotic susceptibility in the planktonic form using the standard minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and in a biofilm using minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC). Chi-square was used to compare the sensitivity results. ♢ RESULTS: The isolates were susceptible to all the antibiotics tested using MIC. Every antibiotic except gentamicin lost its efficacy when the bacteria were grown in a biofilm (p > 0.05). The change in susceptibility was statistically significant to a level of p < 0.001 for all antibiotics tested. ♢ DISCUSSION: In PD peritonitis that is long standing, recurrent, or not responsive to therapy, MBEC testing should be considered as a biofilm may be present. Gentamicin should be strongly considered over other agents for empiric gram-negative coverage as it may be providing synergy in the setting of Staphylococcus aureus. Also, the newer anti-staphylococcal drugs should be tested for their performance in a biofilm using the MBEC method.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Biofilmes/efeitos dos fármacos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Peritonite/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Cefazolina/farmacologia , Ciprofloxacina/farmacologia , Clindamicina/farmacologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Gentamicinas/farmacologia , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Oxacilina/farmacologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Rifampina/farmacologia , Vancomicina/farmacologia
2.
Am J Surg ; 189(5): 558-62; discussion 562-3, 2005 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15862496

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Live donor nephrectomy (LDN) is a major surgical procedure with an accepted low mortality and morbidity. Minimally invasive donor nephrectomy (MIDN) has been shown to decrease the wound morbidity associated with the lumbotomy of the classic open technique. Transplant programs face the challenge of initiating their MIDN programs without jeopardizing the safety of the donor and the graft quality. We present the experience at the University of Calgary after the initiation of a MIDN program, with a preoperative selective approach using the 3 major techniques for LDN. METHODS: From December 2001 to May 2004, 50 consecutive, accepted, live kidney donors were evaluated and chosen to undergo nephrectomy by an open, laparoscopic, or hand-assisted technique. Patients were chosen for a particular technique based on the criteria of vascular anatomy, size of abdominal cavity, previous surgery, and technical implications for the recipient. RESULTS: A total of 15 open, 11 laparoscopic, and 24 hand-assisted nephrectomies were performed. There were no statistically significant differences in sex, age, or body mass index between the groups. There were statistically significant differences in surgical times (P < .001) and in the number of days spent in the hospital (P < .001). All kidneys had primary function. There were 2 conversions in the hand-assisted group and 1 blood transfusion in the open group. Death-censored graft survival was 100% with an observation time of 20 months (SD +/- 9 months; range = 3-32 months). One graft from the hand-assisted group was lost from patient death with functioning graft 8 months after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: The learning curve for MIDN does not necessarily need to impact donor or recipient outcomes. The initiation of an MIDN program can be implemented safely if the cases are selected carefully and the use of the classic open technique is kept as an alternative.


Assuntos
Doadores Vivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Rim/irrigação sanguínea , Rim/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim , Laparoscopia , Laparotomia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Perit Dial Int ; 24(1): 65-7, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15104338

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum biofilm eliminating concentration (MBEC) results were compared to determine changes in the pattern of antibiotic sensitivity of gram-negative bacilli from the planktonic to the biofilm phase of growth. METHODOLOGY: The MIC and MBEC assays were conducted on stored isolates obtained from patients presenting with peritoneal dialysis-related gram-negative peritonitis with Escherichia coli or Pseudomonas. RESULTS: The antibiotic sensitivities of planktonic organisms tested by the MIC assays were significantly higher than the antibiotic sensitivities of the same organisms in their biofilm state, as tested by the MBEC assays. CONCLUSIONS: In their biofilm state, gram-negative bacteria are much less susceptible to antibiotics compared to their antibiotic susceptibility in the planktonic state.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Biofilmes/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Peritonite/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...