Utilidad de la ecografía pulmonar en el diagnóstico y seguimiento de la patología respiratoria neonatal / Usefulness of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of respiratory diseases in neonates

Objetivo: La ecografía pulmonar es una herramienta útil para el diagnóstico y seguimiento de la patología del paciente crítico neonatal. Su uso está cada vez más extendido gracias a sus ventajas sobre otras pruebas de imagen y el rápido incremento en la evidencia científica a su favor, constituyendo así, un pilar básico de las guías «point of care ultrasound» (POCUS) neonatal. El objetivo de este artículo especial es proporcionar las bases y aplicaciones diagnóstico-terapéuticas establecidas de la ecografía pulmonar, y dar a conocer nuevas aplicaciones. Métodos y resultados: La sección de ecografía pulmonar del Grupo de Trabajo de Ecografía Neonatal de la Sociedad Española de Neonatología resume la evidencia científica actual. Se describen los patrones ecográficos de las principales patologías respiratorias, aborda algunas de sus aplicaciones en la asistencia neonatal (predicción de ingreso, necesidad de surfactante, procedimientos ecoguiados, seguimiento del desarrollo pulmonar en el prematuro, entre otros) y propone su incorporación en otros escenarios actualmente menos establecidos como la reanimación o el manejo ventilatorio. Este artículo reafirma los beneficios de esta herramienta para ayudar en el diagnóstico, toma de decisiones terapéuticas, apoyo en procedimientos y valoración pronóstica. Conclusiones: La ecografía pulmonar debe establecerse como la prueba diagnóstica de elección en la patología respiratoria neonatal. Por ello, su entrenamiento debería formar parte de la formación de los neonatólogos e incluirse en los protocolos diagnóstico-terapéuticos asistenciales. Se deben seguir desarrollando líneas de investigación con estudios sólidos y multicéntricos que aumenten la calidad de la evidencia científica. (AU)

Objective: Lung ultrasound is a useful tool for diagnosis and follow-up of diseases in critically ill neonates. Its use is increasingly widespread thanks to its advantages over other imaging tests and the rapidly growing body of evidence to support it, and «point-of-care ultrasound» (POCUS) has become a key component in neonatal guidelines. The objective of this special article is to present the foundations and the established diagnostic and therapeutic applications of lung ultrasonography as well as introducing new applications. Methods and results: The Lung Ultrasound Section of the Neonatal Ultrasonography Working Group of the Spanish Neonatology Society has summarised the current scientific evidence. The article describes the sonographic features of the most common respiratory diseases, discusses some of the applications of ultrasound in neonatal care (such as prediction of admission and need of surfactant, ultrasound-guided procedures or monitoring of lung development in premature infants) and proposes its introduction in other scenarios in which its use is not quite established at present, such as resuscitation or respiratory management. This article reaffirms the usefulness of lung ultrasound in guiding diagnosis, clinical decision-making and prognosis and facilitating procedures. Conclusions: Lung ultrasound should be established as the gold standard for diagnosis of respiratory diseases in neonates. Therefore, training in lung ultrasound should be included in the educational curriculum of neonatologists and in diagnostic and therapeutic care protocols. Research on the subject should continue to be pursued with performance of rigorous multicentre studies to increase the quality of the evidence. (AU)

Ultrasound of pneumothorax in neonates: Diagnostic value of the anterior transverse plane and of mirrored ribs.

INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care lung ultrasound is increasingly used to diagnose pneumothorax efficiently and safely in neonates. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the central and anterior transverse thoracic plane in the ultrasound diagnosis of pneumothorax, analyze the diagnostic value of the "mirrored ribs" sign, and evaluate the predictive value of the lung point location for the need of pleural drainage. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of the Basurto University Hospital (Bilbao, Spain) due to respiratory distress and with ultrasound, with or without pneumothorax, between January 2014 and December 2020. RESULTS: The presence of A-lines behind the sternum in the anterior transverse plane in newborns with pneumothorax (N = 311) and controls (N = 195) was compared. A-lines were present in 98.9% of newborns with pneumothorax compared to none in the controls (p < .0001). Diagnosis of pneumothorax with the anterior transverse plane presented high interobserver reproducibility (κ = 0.92, 95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.00). In contrast, the "mirrored ribs" sign in the anterior longitudinal plane was observed in 35.6% of patients with pneumothorax and in 36.9% of controls (p = .1505). A significant association was observed between lung point location and the need for pleural drainage (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: A-lines in the anterior transverse plane is a simple ultrasound sign which presents high sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility for the diagnosis of pneumothorax. The mirrored ribs sign showed low diagnostic utility. Patients with severe pneumothorax in lung ultrasound are most likely to require thoracic drainage.

The Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Scores in Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

BACKGROUND: Different lung ultrasound (LUS) scanning protocols have been used, and the results in terms of diagnostic accuracy are heterogeneous. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: What is the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS score to predict moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (msBPD)? Does scanning of posterior lung fields improve the diagnostic accuracy? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective, observational study in six centers. Two LUS aeration scores, one involving only anterolateral lung fields and the other adding the posterior fields were obtained at birth, on the third day of life (DOL), on the seventh DOL, on the 14th DOL, and on the 21st DOL. The diagnostic accuracy of both scores to predict msBPD was assessed at each time point. RESULTS: Eight hundred thirty-two LUS examinations in 298 infants were included. Both LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields and LUS score using only anterolateral fields showed a similar moderate diagnostic accuracy to predict msBPD on the third DOL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 95% CI, 0.68-0.85 vs 0.68-0.85; P = .97), seventh DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.74-0.85 vs 0.74-0.84; P = .26), and 21st DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.72-0.86 vs 0.74-0.88; P = .17). The LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields was slightly more accurate at 14th DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.69-0.83 vs 0.66-0.80; P = .01). A cutoff of 8 points in the LUS score using only anterolateral fields on the seventh DOL provided a sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 70%, 79%, 3.3, and 0.38, respectively, to predict msBPD. Adding gestational age (GA) and sex improved the discriminative value without significant differences compared with a predictive model based on multiple clinical variables: AUC 95% CI, 0.77-0.88 vs 0.80-0.91 (P = .52). INTERPRETATION: The LUS score is able to predict msBPD from the third DOL with a moderate diagnostic accuracy. Scanning posterior lung fields slightly improved diagnostic accuracy only at the 14th DOL. Adding GA and sex improves the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS scores. The LUS score is useful to stratify BPD risk early after birth.