Cementless total knee arthroplasty in chronic inflammatory rheumatism.

INTRODUCTION: We report a short-term monocentric retrospective evaluation of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a population suffering from chronic inflammatory rheumatism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have reviewed 23 patients (34 knees) with an average age of 55 years (range 26-78), bearing a TKA for chronic inflammatory rheumatisms with a 6-year follow-up (range 3-12); 78% suffered from rheumatoid arthritis and 15% from juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. We used a cementless total prosthesis sacrificing the posterior cruciate ligament and bearing an ultra-congruent rotational tibial insert, the Natural Knee (NK2™) (Zimmer(®), Warsaw, IN, USA). At last follow-up, an independent surgeon performed a clinical assessment for pain, function and quality of life using International Knee Documentation Committee score, International Knee Society (IKS) score and Devane's score. A radiographic study evaluated secondary fixation according to the radiographic index of the Knee Society and according to Ewald's score. RESULTS: The mean postoperative IKS score was 83 points (range 40-100) for the knee score and 74 points (range 20-100) for the function score. Radiographic assessment came across only one case of loosening, concerning the tibial component on an asymptomatic patient. We came across the following complications: 1 early infection, 2 important postoperative flessum deformity having needed an arthrolysis, 1 supracondylar fracture of the femur and 1 fracture of the patellar component. Survival rate at 6-year follow-up is 97% taking into account one case of revision. CONCLUSION: Non-cementation of this implant in chronic inflammatory rheumatism does not result in a higher rate of loosening. In this series, patients own satisfaction, function of the knee and survival rate are rather good. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective, no control group, Level IV.

A dose escalation study with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in T2N0, T2N1, T3N0 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) approach.

BACKGROUND: The simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique with dose per fraction slightly higher than 2Gy offers the advantages of shortening the treatment time and increasing the biologically equivalent dose to the tumor. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of a dose-escalating radiotherapy treatment by using a SIB-IMRT approach in patients with early and moderately advanced head and neck cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients with pharyngo-laryngeal T2N0 or T2N1, or laryngeal T3N0 SCC were included. The therapeutic PTVs were treated according to three consecutive dose levels i.e., 69 Gy in 30 fractions of 2.3 Gy (dose level I), 72 Gy in 30 fractions of 2.4 Gy (dose level II) or 75 Gy in 30 fractions of 2.5 Gy (dose level III). The prophylactic PTVs received a dose of 55.5 Gy delivered in 30 fractions of 1.85 Gy. The primary endpoint of the study was acute toxicity assessed during treatment and during the first 3 months following the completion of radiotherapy. The secondary endpoints included loco-regional control, disease-free survival, overall survival and late toxicity at 2 years of follow-up. The study design allowed patients to be enrolled in the second dose level group if no more than 10% of grade 4 acute toxicity was observed on the first dose level group within 3 months after the completion of IMRT, and so on for the third level group. RESULTS: Forty-four men and 13 women were included in the trial. The majority of them presented with oropharyngeal cancer (53%) and laryngeal cancer (33%). Only 3 patients developed grade 4 acute mucositis during treatment, one in each dose level. Thirty-two patients (56%) experienced grade 3 toxicity, mostly dermatitis and mucositis, without any significant difference between the groups. Late grade 1 and 2 xerostomia was seen in 53% and 33% of patients, respectively. Transient grade 4 late toxicity was observed in 16% of all patients and was equally distributed among the groups. The 2-year loco-regional control was 82% for all 3 groups (79% dose level I, 88% dose level II, 79% dose level III). The 2-year overall survival was 89% for dose level I and II, and 95% for dose level III. CONCLUSIONS: This dose escalation SIB-IMRT protocol was safe and effective as the sole treatment of early and moderately advanced SCC of head and neck. No toxicity difference was observed between the groups.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: results of the prospective study GORTEC 2004-03.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In 2003, the French Authority for Health (HAS) recommended the use of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in prospective trial before its routine use. The Oncology and Radiotherapy Group for Head and Neck Cancer (GORTEC) proposed to evaluate prospectively acute and late toxicities, locoregional control and overall survival for patients treated for head and neck cancer (HNC) with IMRT and bilateral neck irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2008, 208 patients with HNC were treated with IMRT in 8 centres. There were 38 nasopharynx, 117 oropharynx, 25 pharyngo-larynx, 24 oral cavity and 4 unknown primary (28.5% stage I-II and 71% Stage III-IV). Ninety-three patients (46%) had postoperative IMRT and 78 patients (37.5%) received concurrent chemotherapy. The doses were 70 Gy to the gross tumour, 66 Gy to the high-risk postoperative sites and 50 Gy to the subclinical disease. Toxicities were graded according to the RTOG-EORTC scales. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 25.3 months (range: 0.4-72 months). There were 29 local-regional failures: 24 were in-field, three were marginal and one was out-field. The two-year loco-regional control and overall survival were 86% and 86.7%, respectively. At 18 months, grade ≥ 2 xerostomia was 16.1%. A mean dose to the spared parotid below 28 Gy led to significantly less grade ≥ 2 xerostomia (8.5% vs 24%) with a relative risk of 1.2 [95% CI: 1.02-1.41, p = 0.03]. Grade ≥ 2 xerostomia increased by approximately 3% per Gy of mean parotid dose up to 28, Gy then 7% per Gy above 33 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT for HN cancer seems to reduce late toxicities without jeopardising local control and overall survival.

Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with advanced head and neck tumors treated by combined chemoradiotherapy.

CONTEXT: Few studies have evaluated outcomes of combined chemoradiotherapy for Stage III-IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in terms of the use of nutritional support by means of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). OBJECTIVES: To compare nutritional status and treatment interruption because of acute toxicity in patients with advanced head and neck tumors who were treated by combined chemoradiotherapy and received or did not receive prophylactic PEG tubes. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that evaluated data obtained from a cancer center in Montpellier, France. A total of 139 consecutive patients treated for Stage III-IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from January 1, 1998 to June 30, 2003 were evaluated in terms of nutritional status before and after therapy, treatment interruption because of toxicity, and duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: Seventy-eight of the 139 patients (58%) did not receive prophylactic PEG feeding, and 61 patients (44%) received PEG feeding. Pretreatment nutritional status was worse in the PEG group. Compared with the initial nutritional status, nutritional status at the end of treatment was unchanged in the PEG group and much worse in the group that did not receive the PEG (P<0.05). Cumulative incidence of treatment interruption because of toxicity was significantly lower in the PEG group than in the no-PEG group (100 and 236 days of interruption, respectively, P=0.03) and hospitalization was significantly shorter (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic PEG sustains nutritional status and reduces the cumulative incidence of treatment interruption caused by toxicity and duration of hospitalization. A randomized study is warranted to validate these results.

Concurrent cisplatin/etoposide plus 3D-conformal radiotherapy followed by surgery for stage IIB (superior sulcus T3N0)/III non-small cell lung cancer yields a high rate of pathological complete response.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal preoperative treatment of stage IIB (Pancoast)/III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains undetermined and a subject of controversy. The goal of our study is to confirm feasibility and pathological response rates after induction chemoradiation (CRT) in our community-based treatment center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were selected according to functional and resectability criteria. Induction treatment comprised 3D conformal 4500 cGy radiotherapy delivered to the primary tumor and pathologic hilar and/or mediastinal lymph nodes on CT scan with an extra-margin of 1-1.5 cm. Concurrent chemotherapy regimen was cisplatinum 20mg/m2 d1-d5 and etoposide 50mg/m2 d1-d5, d1-5 d29-33. Within 3-4 weeks after CRT completion, operability was re-assessed accordingly. Surgery was performed 4-6 weeks after CRT completion in patients (pts) deemed resectable. Inoperable pts were referred for a 20-25 Gy boost +/-1 extra-cycle of cisplatinum+etoposide. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2005, 107 pts were initially selected for treatment and received induction chemoradiation (stage IIB-Pancoast 18, IIIA 58 and IIIB 31, squamous cell carcinoma 48%, adenocarcinoma 44%, large-cell undifferentiated carcinoma 14%). After preoperative evaluation, 72 pts (67%) had a thoracotomy (pneumonectomy 21, lobectomy 45, bilobectomy 5) and all but one (unresectable tumor) had a macroscopic complete resection. During the 3-month postoperative time, five patients (6.9%) died, four after pneumonectomy (right 3, left 1). The analysis of tumoral samples showed a pathological complete response rate or microscopic residual foci of 39.5%. Median follow-up time was 22.3 months (survivors: 36.8 months), 2-year and 3-year overall survival rates were 55% and 40%, respectively (median=26.7 months) for all the intention-to-treat population (n=107), 62% and 51% (median=36.5 months) for 71 resected pts, 41% and 16% for 36 non-resected pts (median=19.1 months). On multivariate analysis, surgical resection and tumoral necrosis >50% (or pathological complete response) were the most pertinent predictive factors of the risk of death (hazard ratio=0.50 and 0.48, p=0.006 and 0.038, respectively). CONCLUSION: Surgery was feasible after induction chemoradiation, particularly lobectomy in PS 0-1, stage IIB (Pancoast)/III NSCLC pts but pneumonectomy carries a high risk of postoperative death (particularly, right pneumonectomy). Pathological response to induction chemoradiation was complete in 39.5% of patients and was a significant predictive factor of overall survival.

Dosimetric comparison between coplanar and non coplanar field radiotherapy for ethmoid sinus cancer.

BACKGROUND: To compare non coplanar field (NCF) with coplanar field (CF) -intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning for ethmoid cancer. METHODS: Seven patients treated with NCF IMRT for ethmoid cancer were studied. A CF IMRT optimization was prepared with the same constraints as for the NCF treatment. The maximum point doses (D max) obtained for the different optic pathway structures (OPS) should differ no more than 3% from those achieved with the NCF IMRT plan. The distribution of the dose in the target volume and in the critical structures was compared between the two techniques, as well as the Conformity (CI) and the Homogeneity Indexes (HI) in the target volume. RESULTS: We noted no difference between the two techniques in the OPS for the D1, D2, and D5%, in the inner ear and controlateral lens for the average Dmax, in the temporo-mandibular joints for the average mean dose, in the cord and brainstem for the average D1%. The dose-volume histograms were slightly better with the NCF treatment plan for the planning target volume (PTV) with a marginally better HI but no impact on CI. We found a great improvement in the PTV coverage with the CF treatment plan for two patients with T4 tumors. CONCLUSION: IMRT is one of the treatment options for ethmoid cancer. The PTV coverage is optimal without compromising the protection of the OPS. The impact of non coplanar versus coplanar set up is very slight.

[Anemia in head and neck cancers]. / Anémie et cancers des voies aérodigestives supérieures.

Anemia is very common in head and neck cancer patients, and seems to be correlated with intratumoral hypoxia. Anemia is one of the main prognostic factors of locoregional recurrence and, in some studies, of poor survival. Blood transfusions and human recombinant erythropoietin (rHuEPO) are the two main methods used in clinical practice to correct hemoglobin level during curative treatment. Blood transfusions were rarely evaluated, and did not influence locoregional control of patients treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Retrospective studies evaluating combined treatment of rHuEPO and radiotherapy reported positive impact on locoregional recurrence and actuarial survival. Since the end of 2003, this approach is a matter for debate after the negative results of a prospective randomized study on progression-free survival concerning head and neck cancer patients treated with definitive or postoperative external radiotherapy with or without rHuEPO. Although many biases were reported against this publication, several questions are to be answered in the near future. Among them, erythropoietin receptor expression and activation on tumour cell seem to be the more appropriate explanation of these negative results. In October 2004, preliminary results of the RTOG 99-03 study have been presented at the Astro annual meeting in Atlanta. This prospective randomized trial was designed to determine if concurrent rHuEPO administration (40,000 units) with radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) could improve locoregional control in non-operative head and neck cancers. In the rHuEPO arm, haemoglobin level was significantly increased compared with control arm. However, the addition of concurrent rHuEPO to definitive radiotherapy did not improve locoregional control or survival for mildly/moderately anemic patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Future clinical trials using biological markers are thus imperative to target which patients could benefit from these molecules.