Trochleoplasty Provides Good Outcomes for Recurrent Patellofemoral Dislocations with No Clear Superiority across Different Techniques.

Background: Literature is sparse on outcome comparisons between different trochleoplasty techniques in the treatment of patella instability. To date, it is unclear whether there is a technique that offers superior outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare and evaluate the outcomes of trochleoplasty techniques in the treatment of patellofemoral instability in trochlea dysplasia to establish whether there is an ideal choice of trochleoplasty technique for superior outcomes. Methods: 21 studies involving 880 knees were included. The mean age of the patients was 21.7 years (range 8-49 years). Mean follow-up timeframe of 43.5 months (range 8.8-100 months). Clinical outcomes assessed included rates of recurrence of patellofemoral dislocation, patient satisfaction, Kujala score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner score, and Lysholm score. Egger's test showed no publication bias across all outcomes assessed. Results: Favourable results were seen across all outcomes assessed and patient satisfaction. Improvements were seen with Kujala, IKDC, and Lysholm scores. Tegner scores showed good return to function. Post-operative dislocation and complication rates were low across the different techniques. Meta-regression for Kujala and IKDC scores showed good outcomes regardless of trochleoplasty technique used (Kujala, p = 0.549, relative risk 492.06; IKDC, p = 0.193, RR 0.001). The exact risk that trochleoplasty poses to the cartilage remains uncertain, as no study had a conservatively managed arm for comparison. Conclusions: Trochleoplasty yielded good outcomes irrespective of technique used with no clear superiority demonstrated in any technique in terms of outcome scores, satisfaction, post-operative dislocation rates or complications.

Postoperative delirium following total joint arthroplasties in a multi-ethnic population - A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a cause of poorer patient outcomes following total joint arthroplasties (TJA). However, it often goes undiagnosed. Although various risk factors have been documented, study heterogeneity leads to poor understanding within a South East Asian population. This study aims to evaluate POD within this demographic and elucidate its risk factors. METHODS: This was a single-centre prospective observational study comprising 462 patients. Inclusion criteria was patients 65-90 years old undergoing elective TJA. Exclusion criteria was patients unable to personally provide consent for TJA. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data was recorded to analyse treatment pathway factors. Patients were assessed for POD twice daily for 3 days after TJA using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). RESULTS: Mean age of the study cohort was 72 ± 5 years; 70.1% were female; and mean MMSE score preoperatively was 27.3 ± 3.3. 419 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 43 patients underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). 164 patients received general anaesthesia, and 298 patients received regional anaesthesia. Overall, 0% (0/462) of patients tested positive for POD at any postoperative timepoint. While various CAM components were met, no patients were positive for the complete requisite criteria for POD diagnosis. CONCLUSION: We report zero incidence of POD in 462 patients who underwent elective TJA in our institution. We believe that our streamlined care process including pre-operative assessment, patient-specific anaesthesia regime as well as a strictly administered inpatient clinical care pathway with opioid-reducing strategy and early mobilization are protective factors against POD.

Protocol for a single-centre prospective observational study of postoperative delirium following total joint arthroplasties among South East Asians.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative delirium is a serious and common complication in older adults following total joint arthroplasties (TJA). It is associated with increased risk of postoperative complications, mortality, length of hospital stay and postdischarge institutionalisation. Thus, it has a negative impact on the health-related quality of life of the patient and poses a large economic burden. This study aims to characterise the incidence of postoperative delirium following TJA in the South East Asian population and investigate any risk factors or associated outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre prospective observational study recruiting patients between 65 and 90 years old undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. Exclusion criteria included patients with clinically diagnosed dementia. Preoperative and intraoperative data will be obtained prospectively. The primary outcome will be the presence of postoperative delirium assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3 and day of discharge. Other secondary outcomes assessed postoperatively will include hospital outcomes, pain at rest, knee and hip function, health-related quality of life and Postoperative Morbidity Survey-defined morbidity. Data will be analysed to calculate the incidence of postoperative delirium. Potential risk factors and any associated outcomes of postoperative delirium will also be determined. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Singapore General Hospital Institutional Review Board (SGH IRB) (CIRB Ref: 2017/2467) and is registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (Identified: NCT03260218). An informed consent form will be signed by all participants before recruitment and translators will be made available to non-English-speaking participants. The results of this study will be presented at international conferences and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. The data collected will also be made available in a public data repository. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03260218.