Secure windows for child safety: a retrospective study of window falls in children, aiming to raise prevention awareness.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to enhance understanding, raise awareness and inform prevention programmes regarding potential factors that lead to severe paediatric injuries caused by unintentional falls from windows. METHODS: This is a retrospective review from a major Trauma Centre, covering the majority of North West England and North Wales and included children under the age of 16 that had sustained falls from windows and were hospitalised between April 2015 and June 2020. RESULTS: Overall, 825 patients' records have been reviewed, 39% of which exhibited neurosurgical injuries (322 admissions). The most common cause of injury was falls (42%), out of which 19% was identified as falls from windows which was eventually the core focus of this review (25 patients). The records showed that 72% of the falls were not witnessed by another individual, suggesting that children were being left unattended. Average GCS recorded at presentation was 11.2 and 56% of cases were identified as severe major traumas. With a mean stay of 2.2 days in ICU, 1.6 days in HDU and 6 days in the neurosurgical clinic, average treatment costs per patient were £4,493, £651 and £4,156 respectively. Finally, 52% of patients were identified to require long-term physiotherapy/occupational therapy due to permanent disabilities, 20% long-term antiepileptic treatment for seizures and 44% long-term psychological services input. CONCLUSION: This study presents our experience at a major tertiary trauma centre in the UK over a 5-year period, from a paediatric neurosurgical injuries perspective due to fall from windows. We aim to raise awareness and highlight the importance of establishing prevention programmes which would hopefully decrease the incidence of paediatric window falls.

An Institutional Experience of Fenestrated T-Bar Clip Use in The Management of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Surgical management of an intracranial aneurysm is mainly clipping. Various types of clips have been designed for complex, giant, and other aneurysms. Recently, the Yasargil-fenestrated T-bar clip has been introduced for the management of such complicated aneurysms. The literature regarding its efficacy, limitations, and method of application in complicated aneurysms is limited. We used the fenestrated T-bar clip in four patients of intracranial aneurysms - middle cerebral artery cortical branch aneurysm, anterior communicating artery partially thrombosed aneurysm, internal carotid artery paraclinoid simple aneurysm, and giant aneurysm. All aneurysms were successfully clipped with no residue or branch occlusion. The recovery of all patients was satisfactory. The fenestrated T-bar clip effectively reconstructed the parent artery and occluded the aneurysm in all cases. The application of this clip may be advantageous over the clip application in some uniquely challenging cases.

Dissection of C2 Guiding to C1 Lateral Mass and Facilitation of Screw Placement: Technical Note.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical intervention at the craniovertebral junction requires preoperative and intraoperative planning to get optimum postoperative results. Careful positioning minimizes the risk of iatrogenic injury and can also facilitate adequate surgical exposure. Tortuous venous channels that are usually encountered as the dissection proceeds may cause excessive bleeding before reaching the lateral mass (LM). However, both localization and placement may be made easier by altering the dissection technique and modifying the patient's position. Traditionally, the military tuck position is described for the dorsal approach to the craniovertebral junction. The objective of this study is to emphasize the role of arc or bow like position, a modification of prone position for adequate placement of C1 LM screw in these cases. METHODS: We operated on 68 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation in an arc or bow position from January 2013 to September 2018. In 58 patients, at least 1 C1 LM screw was placed. RESULTS: This position helped in easy and early recognition with easy trajectory for the C1 LM screw placement and less work force. CONCLUSIONS: Visual axis to the lateral mass of C1 in an arc/bow position with head elevation puts C1 LM more in the visual axis of the operator, which makes the trajectory straight without causing much angulation while inserting the screw. At the same time, the axis vertebra guides the surgeon to the C1 lateral mass with no handling of dura.