Direct experience while eating: Laboratory outcomes among individuals with eating disorders versus healthy controls.

OBJECTIVE: To compare individuals with eating disorders (EDs) to healthy controls (HCs) to assess for differences in direct engagement in the eating process. METHOD: Participants (n=58) were asked to eat an orange slice. To assess the degree of direct engagement with the eating process, participants were asked to write down 10 thoughts about the experience of eating the orange slice. Next, the participants were instructed to classify the main focus of each thought as either experiential ("direct experience") or analytical ("thinking about"). A direct experience index (DEI) was computed by dividing the number of times that participants classified an experience as a "direct experience" (the numerator) by the total number of all observations (i.e., direct experience+thinking about). Participants also completed the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) and the Experiences Questionnaire (EQ) to assess mindfulness facets and decentering, respectively. RESULTS: Compared to controls, participants in the EDs group presented significantly lower levels of direct experience during the eating task (EDs group: mean=43.54, SD=29.64; HCs group: mean=66.17, SD=22.23, p=0.03). Participants in the EDs group also scored significantly lower on other mindfulness-related variables. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that engagement with the direct experience of eating is lower in individuals with EDs. Future research should investigate the role of mindfulness-based interventions to address direct experience while eating in individuals with EDs.

Direct experience and the course of eating disorders in patients on partial hospitalization: a pilot study.

Awareness of sensory experience in the present moment is central to mindfulness practice. This type of information processing, in contrast to an analytical evaluative style of processing, could be more beneficial for the course of those psychiatric disorders characterized by ruminative and content-centred processing, such as eating disorders (EDs). We performed a pilot study to assess the relation between patients' approach to information processing and the duration and severity of EDs. Fifty-seven patients with a diagnosed ED were included in the study and participated in a self-guided eating activity to asses the primary information processing mode based on mindfulness concepts of 'Direct Experience' and 'Thinking About'. Additionally, dispositional mindfulness was assessed by the Five Factors Mindfulness Questionnaire, and anxiety during the experiment was determined by means of a 10-point visual analogue scale. We found that a higher level of self-reported Direct Experience was inversely associated with several severity variables and with anxiety levels. Direct Experience was predicted by a low anxiety level, less severe illness, and higher scores on one mindfulness facet (Observing). Our results suggest that a Direct Experience processing approach is associated with better ED outcomes. Future studies should be carried out to clarify the repercussion of mindfulness training on EDs.

E-Ring Isoprostanes Stimulate a Cl Conductance in Airway Epithelium via Prostaglandin E2-Selective Prostanoid Receptors.

Isoprostanes comprise a class of membrane lipid metabolites produced during oxidative stress, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cystic fibrosis. They are widely recognized to evoke a variety of biological responses in airway and pulmonary vascular smooth muscle, lymphatics, and innervation. However, their effects on airway epithelium are largely unstudied. We examined the electrophysiological responses evoked by several different isoprostane species in bovine airway epithelium using the Ussing chamber technique. The E-ring isoprostanes 15-E(1t)-IsoP and 15-E(2t)-IsoP evoked a substantial increase in short-circuit current (I(SC)), whereas four different F-ring isomers were ineffective. 15-E(2t)-IsoP-evoked I(SC) was mimicked by the prostaglandin E(2)-selective prostanoid receptor (EP)-agonist prostaglandin E(2) but not by agonists of EP(1)/EP(3)-, FP-, or TP receptors (sulprostone, fluprostenol, and U46619, respectively). This response was significantly reduced by the EP(4)-receptor blocker GW627386 but not by blockers of other prostanoid receptors (ICI 192,605 [TP-selective], SC19220 [EP(1)-selective], AH6809 [DP/EP(1)/EP(2)-selective], and AL8810 [FP-selective]). 15-E(2t)-IsoP-evoked I(SC) was reduced by blockers of Cl(-) channels (niflumic acid and 5-nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino)-benzoic acid), of Na(+)/K(+)/2Cl(-) co-transport (furosemide and bumetanide), of adenylate cyclase (MDL 12,330A), or of guanylate cyclase (1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one) but not by blockers of Na(+) conductances (amiloride). We conclude that 15-E(2t)-IsoP activates a transepithelial Cl(-) conductance in bovine airway epithelium through an EP(4) receptor coupled to adenylate cyclase and soluble guanylate cyclase.