A comparison of results following the treatment of placenta accreta and placenta increta using high-intensity focused ultrasound followed by hysteroscopic resection.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) followed by hysteroscopic resection for different placenta accreta spectrum disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with placenta accreta, placenta increta, or placenta percreta were treated with USgHIFU from January 2016 to December 2019 and were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were classified into three categories according to the relationship between the trophoblastic villi and the myometrium, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Fifteen patients were classified as placenta accreta, 17 patients were classified as placenta increta, and 2 were classified as placenta percreta. All patients completed follow-up. Treatment efficacy and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: No significant differences in baseline characteristics and results of HIFU ablation were observed between the patients with placenta accreta and those with placenta increta. The return of HCG levels to normal was longer in patients with placenta accreta compared with patients with placenta increta, while no significant difference was observed in the amount of intraoperative blood loss, the return of normal menstruation and the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: HIFU treatment followed by hysteroscopic resection is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with placenta accreta and placenta increta.

A retrospective study of ultrasound-guided high intensity focussed ultrasound ablation for multiple uterine fibroids in South Africa.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the shrinkage rate, symptom relief and improvement of the quality of life following ultrasound-guided high intensity focussed ultrasound (USgHIFU) for multiple uterine fibroids. METHODS: From October 2015 to November 2016, 81 black women with multiple symptomatic fibroids underwent USgHIFU. The number of the fibroids ranged from 3 to 9. The shrinkage rate of fibroids, symptom severity score and quality of life were evaluated following USgHIFU. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the uterine fibroid symptom and quality of life (UFS-QOL) questionnaire were used for evaluation. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 35.3 ± 5.9 years. The average weight of these patients was 68.4 ± 11.4 kg, with the median abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness of 38.0 ± 11.4 mm. The median fibroid volume was 36.0 (range: 1.8-1220.1) cm³. During HIFU, 60.5% of the patients reported lower abdominal pain, 43.2% sciatic/buttock pain, 60.5% skin "burning" sensation, 6.2% abnormal vaginal discharge and 13.6% transient leg pain. No severe complications were observed. The average volume reduction rate of fibroids in 21 patients who completed the follow-up was 32.5 ± 24.0, 42.3 ± 32.2 and 52.5 ± 36.3% 1, 3 and 6 months after HIFU, respectively. The UFS score decreased and the QOL values significantly increased during the follow-up period. Re-intervention treatment occurred in two of the 21 patients 6 months after HIFU. One patient conceived 3 months after HIFU, and she had a term vaginal delivery without any obstetrical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, USgHIFU is safe and effective in treating patients with multiple uterine fibroids.

High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of adenomyosis: selection criteria, efficacy, safety and fertility.

Adenomyosis is a disorder of uterus in which endometrial glands and stroma are present within the uterine musculature. The main clinical manifestations are dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia. Adenomyosis has a great impact on both the quality of life and fertility of women. The treatment of adenomyosis remains an immense challenge. Relevant articles were searched through MEDLINE and PubMed between 2000 and March 2017. The search terms of adenomyosis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of adenomyosis, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), ultrasound-guided HIFU and MRgFUS were used. There were no language restrictions. HIFU is a non-invasive local thermal ablation technique which has been used in the treatment of both focal and diffuse adenomyosis. Several case studies have demonstrated that HIFU presents low rate of minor and/or major complications and, at the same time, a long symptom-relief period. Multiple factors such as the enhancement type of the adenomyotic lesion, volume of the adenomyotic lesions, number of hyperintense foci on T2WI, location of the uterus, location of adenomyotic lesions, thickness of the abdominal wall and distance from the skin to the adenomyotic lesions contribute to the efficacy of HIFU. Consequently, based on these contributing factors, specific and strict selection criteria have been used to achieve higher efficacy. Thus, patients with pelvic endometriosis, adhesions between the bowel and the uterus, or an abdominal surgical scar wider than 10 mm, are not suitable for HIFU treatment. Moreover, HIFU-treated patients with adenomyosis, who wished to conceive, showed high conception and live birth rates. HIFU is a new and promising treatment option for patients with adenomyosis, but its efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness and fertility outcome must be evaluated by randomized controlled trials.

High intensity focused ultrasound treatment of adenomyosis: The relationship between the features of magnetic resonance imaging on T2 weighted images and the therapeutic efficacy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between the features of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on T2 weighted images (T2WI) and the therapeutic efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) on adenomyosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to November 2015, four hundred and twenty-eight patients with symptomatic adenomyosis were treated with HIFU. Based on the signal intensity and the number of hyperintense foci in the adenomyotic lesions on T2WI, the patients were classified into groups. The day after HIFU ablation patients underwent contrast-enhanced MRI and a comparison was made of non-perfused volume (NPV) ratio, energy efficiency factor (EEF), treatment time, sonication time, and adverse effects. RESULTS: No significant difference in terms of HIFU treatment settings and results was observed between the group of patients with hypointense adenomyotic lesions and the group with isointense adenomyotic lesions (P>0.05). However, the sonication time and EEF were significantly higher in the group with multiple hyperintense foci compared to the group with few hyperintense foci. The NPV ratio achieved in the lesions with multiple hyperintenese foci was significantly lower than that in the lesions with few hyperintense foci (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the rate of adverse effects between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, the response of the adenomyotic lesions to HIFU treatment is not related to the signal intensity of adenomyotic lesions on T2WI. However, the number of the high signal intensity foci in the adenomyotic lesions on T2WI can be considered as a predictive factor to help select patients for HIFU treatment.