Task redistribution from general practitioners to nurses in acute infection care: A prospective cohort study.

AIM: To examine the impact of implementing nurse-led consultations compared to physician-led consultations on the frequency of follow-up contacts within 14 days following an acute infectious consultation. DESIGN: Monocentric, prospective cohort study. METHODS: The study was conducted in a multidisciplinary, capitation-based general practice in Belgium. Through analysis of patient files, the number of follow-up contacts within 14 days after an infection consultation was investigated to determine any difference between physician-led or nurse-led consultations. Secondary outcomes included pharmacological interventions and the prescribing behaviour of medical leave certificates. RESULTS: A total of 352 consultations were analysed, of which 174 conducted by physicians and 178 by nurses. No significant difference was found in the number of follow-up contacts. However, the probability of a pharmacological intervention by a physician was revealed to be significantly higher. The presence or absence of such pharmacological intervention did not significantly influence the number of follow-up contacts. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that nurses can be safely and efficiently utilized in acute infection care within a general practice setting. Although these results are promising, more extensive research is needed which incorporates the experiences of patients and healthcare providers. Furthermore, it is advisable to consider the experience and education of the nurses and incorporate them into the analyses. IMPACT: This study addressed the high workload on general practitioners by researching a task shift in the acute infectious, primary health care. The results demonstrate the feasibility of this task shift, which may have an impact on primary health care professionals (whose workload may be reorganized), as well as on patients for whom primary care may become more accessible. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study includes direct patient data from people who presented themselves with acute infectious complaints in a primary healthcare practice.

The guided use of an e-health tool to strengthen health literacy. A pilot study in a multicultural diabetes population in a primary care clinic in Brussels.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate whether the use of an e-health tool, guided by a healthcare provider, can improve health literacy (HL) in primary care. Methods: We set up a longitudinal prospective cohort study in a primary care clinic in Brussels. Diabetes patients were invited to participate in two study consultations with a trained healthcare provider, in which an e-health tool was introduced. The Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) was used to evaluate HL before (n = 59) and after intervention (n = 41). The data were analysed within SPSS, Version 26. Additionally, impressions and experiences of both patients and healthcare providers were collected throughout the different phases of the study. Results: Patients feel significantly stronger in finding good health information after intervention (p = 0.041), with relatively stronger progress for the subgroup with weaker digital skills (p = 0.029). Participants also declare understanding health information better after intervention (p = 0.050). Specifically, the lower educated participants feel reinforced to correctly evaluate and assess health information and come closer to the skill level of the higher educated patients after intervention. The relationship with the healthcare provider was also more markedly enhanced within the group of the lower educated (p = 0.008; difference between higher and lower educated), which could strengthen self-management in the long run. Conclusions: The guided use of an e-health tool in primary care strengthens various patient HL skills. Most particularly the skills "the ability to find good health information" and "understand health information well enough to know what to do" are reinforced. Moreover, patient populations with lower HL, such as the lower educated and lower digitally skilled, show a greater learning potential. Innovation: Our results offer further proof for the learnable and flexible nature of HL, and show that even a small e-health intervention, in a very diverse patient population, can produce significant, positive effects on HL. These results need to be considered as promising, and a motivation for further investments in more widely accessible e-health tools to further improve HL at population level and to bridge health differences.

Online on-the-spot searching increases use of evidence during consultations in family practice.

OBJECTIVE: The project aimed to search for online evidence in a structured way in consultation with the patient, to investigate whether the evidence discovered changed decisions. METHODS: We developed the "Online on-the-spot" method (OOS) as a part of a quality improvement program. Within a general practice consultation three physicians and two trainees searched in a fixed pattern and sequence the national guidelines of general practitioners developed by the Dutch College of General Practitioners, Clinical Evidence, Trip-database and the British Medical Journal. All GPs who performed this quality improvement program were in favor of the project. RESULTS: During 3 months five GPs registered 365 searches out of 2920 patient-doctor contacts. For each eight patient-doctor contacts there was one online search. Patients were actively involved in 53% of the searches (95%C.I.: 48-57%). On average, two databases were consulted. An answer to the question was found in 87% of cases and in almost half of cases it was relevant new information for the doctor. The GP changed his decision due to the problem in 26% (95%C.I.: 21-29) of cases. At the end of the OOS project, the number of searches within 5 min were significantly higher than at the start: 51% (95% C.I.: 44-59) to 33% (95% C.I.: 24-43), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The OOS project is a timely answer to the doctors' educational needs in attending to the patient. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: OOS could connect the patient, the doctor and the evidence.