Efficacy and safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in acute cardiac care management.

PURPOSE: Patients admitted to cardiac intensive care unit need administration of drugs intravenously often in concomitance of therapeutic techniques such as non-invasive ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. Therefore, the insertion of central venous catheters provides a reliable access for delivering medications, laboratory testing and hemodynamic monitoring, but it is associated with the risk of important complications. In our study, we tested the efficacy and safety of peripherally inserted central catheters to manage cardiac intensive care. METHODS: All patients admitted to cardiac intensive care unit with indication for elective central venous access were checked by venous arm ultrasound for peripherally inserted central catheter's implantation. Peripherally inserted central catheters were inserted by ultrasound-guided puncture. After 7 days from the catheter's placement and at the removal, vascular ultrasound examination was performed searching signs of upper extremity deep venous thrombosis. In case of sepsis, blood cultures peripherally from the catheter and direct culture of the tip of the catheter were done to establish a catheter-related blood stream infection. RESULTS: In our cardiac intensive care unit, 137 peripherally inserted central catheters were placed: 80.3% of patients eligible for a peripherally inserted central catheter were implanted. The rate of symptomatic catheter-related peripheral venous thrombosis was 1.4%. Catheter-related blood stream infection was diagnosed in one patient (0.7%; 5.7 × 1000 peripherally inserted central catheter days). All peripherally inserted central catheters were inserted successfully without other major complications. CONCLUSIONS: In patients admitted to cardiac intensive care unit, peripherally inserted central catheters' insertion was feasible in a high percentage of patients and was associated with low infective complications and clinical thrombosis rate.

Continuous venovenous hemofiltration after coronary procedures for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with severe chronic renal failure.

Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is a renal replacement therapy that has been successfully used in patients with severe chronic renal failure to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). In this study, we present a consecutive experience using a new CVVH protocol that has also been applied to patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). CVVH was performed in consecutive patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (mean ± SD, 21.1 ± 7.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) undergoing diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures starting after the angiographic procedures. Iopamidol was used as a contrast agent. In the first 6 patients, iopamidol removal by the CVVH hemofilter and kidney was calculated by measuring iopamidol concentrations in the blood, urine, and ultrafiltrate collected during the 6-hour CVVH session. In the second phase, the protocol was applied to 47 additional patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Six-hour CVVH resulted in iopamidol removal comparable with that of 12-hour diuresis (43 ± 12% vs 42 ± 15% of administered, p = NS). CI-AKI occurred in 7.5% of patients in the whole population and no patients had acute pulmonary edema, need for dialysis, or any major bleeding. In conclusion, in a population including patients with ACS with severe chronic renal failure undergoing coronary angiographic procedures, 6-hour CVVH performed only after contrast medium exposure was able to remove an amount of contrast medium similar to that removed by the kidneys in 12 hours and resulted in a low rate of CI-AKI.

[Chronic renal failure in acute coronary syndromes]. / L'insufficienza renale cronica nelle sindromi coronariche acute.

Chronic renal failure is an important risk factor in acute coronary syndromes. Patients with chronic renal failure have a worse in-hospital and long-term outcome than patients with normal renal function. Although chronic renal failure is associated with other risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, high Killip class, peripheral vascular disease), multivariate analysis of several studies has consistently shown that chronic renal failure significantly and independently affects outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Such patients are treated less aggressively than patients with normal renal function: beta-blockers, aspirin and statins are less frequently used in the intensive care unit. Few data are available on the immediate and long-term effects of an aggressive strategy based on early coronary angiography and subsequent revascularization in such patients. Moreover, only few patients with advanced renal disease have been enrolled in trials comparing treatment modalities in acute coronary syndrome. However, when great care is taken to avoid high contrast medium load, blood loss and periprocedural hypotension, which may result in deterioration of renal function, interventional techniques may prove to be successful in improving outcome.

Integrated analysis of myocardial blush and ST-segment elevation recovery after successful primary angioplasty: Real-time grading of microvascular reperfusion and prediction of early and late recovery of left ventricular function.

BACKGROUND: ST-segment elevation (SigmaSTe) recovery and the angiographic myocardial blush (MB) grade are useful markers of microvascular reperfusion after recanalization of the infarct-related artery. We investigated the ability of a combined analysis of MB grade and SigmaSTe changes to identify different patterns of myocardial reperfusion shortly after primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and to predict 7-day and 6-month left ventricular (LV) functional recovery. METHODS AND RESULTS: MB grade and SigmaSTe recovery were evaluated shortly after successful primary PTCA (restoration of TIMI grade 3 flow) in 114 consecutive patients with SigmaSTe acute myocardial infarction. LV function was assessed by 2D echocardiograms before PTCA and at 7 days and 6 months thereafter. By combining MB and SigmaSTe changes, 3 main groups of patients were identified. Group 1 patients (n=60) had both significant MB (grade 2 to 3) and SigmaSTe recovery (>50% versus basal SigmaSTe) and a high rate of 7-day (65%) and 6-month (95%) LV functional recovery. In group 2 patients (n=21), who showed MB but persistent SigmaSTe, the prevalence of early LV functional recovery was low (24%) but increased up to 86% in the late phase. Group 3 patients (n=28), who had neither significant MB nor SigmaSTe resolution, had poor early (18%) and late (32%) LV functional recovery. CONCLUSIONS: After successful primary PTCA, integrated analysis of MB and SigmaSTe recovery allows a real-time grading of microvascular reperfusion of the infarct area and predicts the time-course and magnitude of LV functional recovery.

Comparative short-term prognostic value of hemostatic and inflammatory markers in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Recent data show that markers of inflammation, endothelial perturbation as well as activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems are altered in unstable angina. The purpose of this study was to compare the 30-day prognostic value of the indexes of inflammation [interleukin-6 (IL-6)], endothelial activation [von Willebrand factor antigen (vWf)], fibrinolysis [plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)] and coagulation (F1 + 2), in a consecutive series of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients consecutively admitted to the coronary care unit because of chest pain occurring within the previous 24 hours were included in the study. Blood was drawn on admission to the coronary care unit and 72 hours thereafter for the assessment of plasma levels of IL-6, vWf, F1 + 2 and PAI-1. Troponin I serum levels were measured 6 to 12 hours after admission. All patients underwent coronary arteriography. RESULTS: Patients were divided into two groups according to their 30-day outcome: 57 patients (group 1) had an uneventful outcome, whereas 31 patients had an adverse clinical event (4 died, 1 had a Q wave myocardial infarction and 26 had refractory angina). The baseline biochemical variables were similar between group 1 and group 2 patients. Seventy-two hours following admission, an increase in the serum levels of IL-6 was observed in 71% of group 2 patients and in 28% of group 1 patients (p = 0.0001). The other measured variables showed significant changes at 72 hours versus entry only in group 1 patients, and no significant difference between the two groups. The areas under the ROC curves were higher for IL-6 (0.72) than for the other variables (0.58 for F1 + 2, 0.52 for vWf and 0.54 for PAI-1). In a multivariate model, including clinical, angiographic, and biochemical variables, only the change in IL-6 over 72 hours was significantly associated with a worse 30-day outcome (odds ratio 8.472, 95% confidence interval 1.030-69.671). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a mounting inflammatory process, as indicated by increasing levels of IL-6 over the first 72 hours after admission, is the most powerful predictor of the 30-day prognosis in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.