Point-of-care ultrasound educational interventions in the neonatal intensive care unit: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The benefits of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) have been widely recognized, but education on this area of practice remains variable. We reviewed published educational interventions regarding POCUS use in the NICU and whether they have led to sustainable increases in POCUS use. METHODS: A systematic search of 6 databases was performed for publications from January 2000 to March 2021. Studies with quantitative data related to POCUS educational interventions in the NICU were included. Data on number of participants and roles, educational intervention, curriculum description, and project outcome measures (including sustainability) was extracted. RESULTS: The search resulted in 686 articles, of which nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Educational interventions included didactic sessions, simulation practice, animal practice, and practice in real patients. The most common assessment was based on the quality and accuracy of the images. At the participant level, the average time to reach proficiency ranged from eight hours and thirty-six minutes to five months, and none of the studies evaluated sustainability of POCUS use after the intervention. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of standardized training modules and assessments for POCUS use in the NICU. Given that none of the studies addressed sustainability or standardized training, we recommend that a standardized training protocol and assessment tool is developed and studied longitudinally; and that barriers to sustainable POCUS use in the NICU (such as billing issues and a lack of POCUS machines and instructors) be systematically addressed as part of this work.

Do GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is reduce cardiovascular events in women with type 2 diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: The risk of cardiovascular disease is often underestimated in women. This leads to a delay in controlling the risk factors for cardiovascular disease and even delays in prescribing medications with cardiovascular benefit. Our aim was to explore if glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) medications would reduce cardiovascular events in women with type 2 diabetes when atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) predominates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched for randomized trials comparing GLP-1RA or SGLT-2i to placebo in people with type 2 diabetes and had a primary outcome exploring major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Data concerning women were then extracted. A sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed according to the class of diabetes medication. RESULTS: A total of 9 trials (GLP-1RA in 6 trials and SGLT-2i in 3) were included. Of the 84,258 participants enrolled, 30,784 (37%) participants were women. Pooled results showed a statistically significant lower incidence of MACE favouring diabetes medications (GLP-1RA or SGLT-2i) compared to placebo (RR [95%CI]=0.87 [0.80, 0.94]). On restricting the analysis to GLP-1RA then to SGLT-2i, results remained significant with GLP-1RA but not SGLT-2i. CONCLUSIONS: In women with type 2 diabetes who either have increased cardiovascular risk or established cardiovascular disease and ASCVD predominates, GLP-1RA significantly reduce the incidence of MACE while SGLT-2i result in a non-significant reduction. SGLT-2i may have comparable effect when examined in more studies. GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i should be considered without delay in women with type 2 diabetes and increased risk for cardiovascular disease.

A mechanistic pharmacokinetic model with drug and antidrug antibody interplay, and its application for assessing the impact of immunogenicity response on bioequivalence testing.

AIMS: Single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in healthy subjects have been the design of choice for bioequivalence determination for decades. This preference has been recently extended to PK similarity studies of proposed biosimilars. However, PK similarity studies can be complicated by the effect of immunogenicity response on drug disposition. The impact is exacerbated when there is an imbalance in host-specific immunological characteristics of subjects between the test and reference groups. Such complications remain poorly understood. The purpose of this communication is to show that the impact of immunogenicity response on PK similarity determination can be critical, using adalimumab as an example. METHODS: Data for adalimumab concentrations and immunogenicity response over 10 weeks were obtained from 133 healthy subjects receiving a 40 mg dose of Humira® in a PK similarity study. Also, a population PK model with a mechanistic construct for delineating the interplay between adalimumab disposition and antidrug antibodies response was utilized to estimate via simulation the probability that a PK similarity study would fail in typical study settings. RESULTS: The simulations showed that the immunogenicity response can have a profound impact on the outcome of PK similarity determination. As such, the probability of failing to achieve the similarity conclusion increased to 51.9%, from 13.8% in the absence of immunogenicity response. CONCLUSION: This study provides a model-based framework for better understanding of how a PK similarity study can be optimally designed and for interpretation of the outcome of PK similarity determination when the drug disposition is affected in the presence of immunogenicity response.

Comparing once-weekly semaglutide to incretin-based therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Our aim was to compare once-weekly semaglutide to incretin-based therapies - defined as either dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) or other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) - in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We searched for randomized trials comparing once-weekly semaglutide to other incretin-based therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes. We pooled trials that compared semaglutide to other GLP-1RA together, and those comparing semaglutide to DPP-4i together. The primary outcome was the change in haemoglobin A1c over time. RESULTS: Five trials met our inclusion criteria. There was a significantly greater reduction in haemoglobin A1c favouring semaglutide when compared to other GLP-1RA or DPP-4i [MD (95% CI) = -0.38% (-0.62, -0.15) and -1.14% (-1.53, -0.75) respectively]. There was a significantly greater weight loss favouring semaglutide when compared to other GLP-1RA or DPP-4i [MD (95% CI) = -2.50 kg (-3.91, -1.09) and -3.19 kg (-3.66, -2.72) respectively]. The proportion of patients achieving glycaemic goals and goal weight loss was greater in semaglutide-treated patients when compared to either other GLP-1RA or DPP-4i. However, semaglutide-treated patients had a significantly higher incidence of gastrointestinal side effects. CONCLUSIONS: While both once-weekly semaglutide and other incretin-based therapies can reduce haemoglobin A1c, semaglutide causes a more potent haemoglobin A1c reduction and greater weight loss when compared to other incretin-based therapies. However, this potent effect of semaglutide was associated with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal side effects. Additional studies are needed to determine whether this marked reduction in both haemoglobin A1c and body weight may translate into improved cardiovascular outcomes.

A comparative clinical study of PF-06410293, a candidate adalimumab biosimilar, and adalimumab reference product (Humira®) in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: This double-blind, randomized, 78-week study evaluated the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-06410293, a candidate adalimumab biosimilar, versus adalimumab reference product (Humira®) sourced from the EU (adalimumab-EU) in biologic-naïve patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate (MTX) (10-25 mg/week). We report results for the first 26 weeks of treatment. METHODS: Patients with active RA (N = 597) were randomly assigned (1:1) to PF-06410293 or adalimumab-EU, while continuing with MTX treatment. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) at week 12. Therapeutic equivalence was concluded if the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the ACR20 difference between the two arms was entirely contained within the symmetric equivalence margin (±14%). Additionally, a two-sided 90% CI was calculated by using an asymmetric equivalence margin (-12%, 15%). Secondary efficacy endpoints to week 26 included ACR20/50/70, change from baseline Disease Activity Score based on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [DAS28-4(CRP)], European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response, DAS28-4(CRP) of less than 2.6, and ACR/EULAR remission. QuantiFERON-TB testing was performed at screening and week 26. RESULTS: Patients (78.7% of whom were female and whose mean age was 52.5 years) had a mean baseline RA duration of 6.8 years. The mean baseline DAS28-4(CRP) values were 5.9 (PF-06410293) and 6.1 (adalimumab-EU). The observed week-12 ACR20 values were 68.7% (PF-06410293) and 72.7% (adalimumab-EU) in the intention-to-treat population. With non-responder imputation, the treatment difference in week-12 ACR20 was -2.98% and corresponding CIs-95% CI (-10.38%, 4.44%) and 90% CI (-9.25%, 3.28%)-were entirely contained within the equivalence margins (symmetric and asymmetric, respectively). The secondary efficacy endpoints were similar between arms. Over 26 weeks, injection-site reactions occurred in 1.7% versus 2.0%, hypersensitivity events in 4.4% versus 8.4%, pneumonia in 0.7% versus 2.0%, and opportunistic infections in 2.4% versus 1.7% in the PF-06410293 and adalimumab-EU arms, respectively. One death due to myocardial infarction occurred (adalimumab-EU arm). Rates of anti-drug antibody incidence were 44.4% (PF-06410293) and 50.5% (adalimumab-EU). CONCLUSIONS: The study results demonstrate that efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of PF-06410293 and adalimumab-EU were similar during the first 26 weeks of treatment in patients with active RA on background MTX. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02480153 . First posted on June 24, 2015; EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT number: 2014-000352-29 . Start date: October 27, 2014.

A randomized controlled trial comparing PF-06438179/GP1111 (an infliximab biosimilar) and infliximab reference product for treatment of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy.

BACKGROUND: This double-blind, active-controlled, randomized, multinational study evaluated the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of PF-06438179/GP1111 (IxifiTM/Zessly®), an infliximab biosimilar, vs infliximab (Remicade®) reference product sourced from the European Union (infliximab-EU) in biologic-naïve patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate therapy. This paper reports results from the initial 30-week treatment period. METHODS: Patients (N = 650) were stratified by geographic region and randomized 1:1 to PF-06438179/GP1111 or infliximab-EU (3 mg/kg intravenous at weeks 0, 2, and 6, then every 8 weeks). Dose escalation to 5 mg/kg was allowed starting at week 14 for patients with inadequate RA response. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology criteria for ≥ 20% clinical improvement (ACR20) response at week 14. Therapeutic equivalence was declared if the two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was within the symmetric equivalence margin of ± 13.5%. Statistical analysis was also performed with a two-sided 90% CI using an asymmetric equivalence margin (- 12.0%, 15.0%). RESULTS: Patients (80.3% female; 79.4% seropositive) had a mean RA duration of 6.9 years, and mean baseline Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, four components based on C-reactive protein was 6.0 in both arms. Week 14 ACR20 in the intention-to-treat population was 62.7% for PF-06438179/GP1111 and 64.1% for infliximab-EU. Week 14 ACR20 using nonresponder imputation was 61.1% for PF-06438179/GP1111 and 63.5% for infliximab-EU, and the 95% (- 9.92%, 5.11%) and 90% (- 8.75%, 4.02%) CIs for the treatment difference (- 2.39%) were entirely contained within the prespecified symmetric and asymmetric equivalence margins, respectively. No differences were observed between arms for secondary efficacy endpoints. Overall postdose antidrug antibody (ADA) rates through week 30 were 48.6% and 51.2% for PF-06438179/GP1111 and infliximab-EU, respectively. Efficacy and immunogenicity were similar between treatments for patients with dose escalation (at or after week 14), as well as between treatments for patients without dose escalation. Safety profiles of PF-06438179/GP1111 and infliximab-EU were similar, with no clinically meaningful differences observed between arms, including after ADA development. Serum drug concentrations were similar between arms at each time point during the initial 30-week treatment period. CONCLUSION: PF-06438179/GP1111 and infliximab-EU demonstrated similar efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and PK with or without dose escalation in patients with moderate to severe active RA on background methotrexate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02222493 . Registered on 21 August 2014. EudraCT, 2013-004148-49 . Registered on 14 July 2014.

Biosimilars Have Arrived: Rituximab.

A biosimilar is a biologic product that is highly similar to a licensed biologic ("originator") such that there are no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, or potency between the biosimilar and the originator. As patent protection and data exclusivity for the biologic rituximab expire, several potential biosimilars to rituximab are in development, which could soon lead to the availability of numerous rituximab biosimilars. Biosimilars are evaluated using thorough and rigorous analyses of the potential biosimilar versus the originator biological to confirm similar structure, function, and clinical efficacy as well as safety. Approval of a biosimilar is based upon the totality of the evidence demonstrating similarity to the originator. An understanding of the process of the interchangeable designation of a biosimilar is important in the context of patient outcomes. We conducted an analysis of the properties and benefits of rituximab in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, the development and approval of biosimilars, and the potential benefits of rituximab biosimilars. PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for "biosimilar" and "rituximab" and regulatory and pharmaceutical company web pages were screened regarding biosimilars in development and specific guidelines developed for the approval of biosimilars. The results indicate that, at present, six rituximab biosimilar candidates are undergoing comparative clinical development, and two were recently approved in the European Union. Our analysis indicates rituximab biosimilars are expected to have a continuing role in treating inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis.

Comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors to DPP-4 inhibitors as an add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Our aim was to compare Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) to Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) as add-on therapy to metformin. METHODS: We searched for randomized trials comparing SGLT-2i to DPP-4i as add-on therapy to metformin in Type 2 diabetes.We pooled trials reporting outcomes between 12 and 26 weeks together while trials reporting results ≥52 weeks were pooled together. The primary outcomes were the change in haemoglobin A1c (A1c) at ≤26 and ≥52 weeks. Sensitivity analyses were performed according to the dose of SGLT-2i and according to baseline A1c for the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Seven trials met our inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant reduction in A1c at ≥52 weeks favouring SGLT-2i compared to DPP-4i (MD [95% CI]=-0.11% [-0.20, -0.03]) but no significant difference at ≤26 weeks (MD [95% CI]=-0.05% [-0.16, 0.05]). SGLT-2i caused significantly more weight loss compared to DPP-4i at ≤26 weeks and ≥52 weeks (MD [95% CI]=-2.31kg [-2.66, -1.96] and -2.45kg [-2.83, -2.07], respectively). SGLT-2i treated patients had a significantly more genital infection compared to DPP-4i. On restricting the analysis according to the SGLT-2i FDA-approved dose, only higher doses at ≥52 weeks showed a statistically significant reduction in A1c compared to DPP-4i. On restricting the analysis according to baseline A1c, results favoured DPP-4i if baseline A1c was<8.5%, but favoured SGLT-2i if ≥8.5%. CONCLUSION: While both SGLT-2i and DPP-4i can reduce A1c, SGLT-2i causes a more robust A1c reduction and more weight loss but with more genital infections. Higher doses of SGLT-2i showed more efficacy when compared to DPP-4i; however, this data should be interpreted cautiously given the limited number of trials.

Biosimilar biologic drugs: a new frontier in medical care.

Physicians in training are expected to be aware of the newest developments in patient care. Biologic therapies have changed treatment of many diseases by specifically targeting key disease mediators, but patient access to these therapies can be limited. As patents for the first biologic therapies are expiring, the development and approval of products known as biosimilars is rapidly gaining momentum. A biosimilar is a biologic product that is highly similar to a reference product (a licensed biologic product), notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components. Biosimilars undergo a thorough evaluation compared with the licensed biologic and need to demonstrate comparable clinical pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety including immunogenicity. Understanding the processes for new drug approvals, the rigorous evaluation of biosimilars, and considerations about their selection and use can help recently trained physicians to make informed treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes.

Infliximab vs. adalimumab in Crohn's disease: results from 327 patients in an Australian and New Zealand observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα) treatment for Crohn's disease is the standard of care for patients with an inadequate response to corticosteroids and immunomodulators. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab and adalimumab in clinical practice and assess the value of concomitant immunomodulator therapy. METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study in consecutive patients with Crohn's disease qualifying for anti-TNFα treatment in Australia and New Zealand between 2007 and 2011. Demographic and clinical data were prospectively recorded to identify independent factors associated with induction and maintenance of response to infliximab or adalimumab, or to either anti-TNFα therapy. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-seven patients (183 infliximab, 144 adalimumab) successfully applied for treatment. Eighty-nine percent responded in all groups and median maintenance of response was similar for the two agents. Concomitant immunomodulator with infliximab, but not adalimumab, demonstrated a significantly longer response overall (P = 0.002), and significantly fewer disease and treatment-related complications (P = 0.017). Corticosteroids at baseline, and/or in the preceding 12 months, were associated with a 9-13 times greater risk of disease flare during maintenance treatment as compared to no corticosteroids (P < 0.0001). Maintenance of response was similar in the anti-TNF naïve and anti-TNF experienced subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, real-life study, we demonstrate infliximab and adalimumab to have similar response characteristics. However, infliximab requires concomitant immunomodulator to achieve optimal maintenance of response comparable to adalimumab monotherapy. The results of this study will assist clinicians in further optimising patient care in their day-to-day clinical practice.

Biosimilars for the Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review of Published Evidence.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians are required to assimilate, critically evaluate, and extrapolate information to support appropriate use of biosimilars across indications. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to systematically collate all published data in order to assess the weight (quantity and quality) of available evidence for each molecule and inform and support healthcare decision-making in chronic inflammatory diseases. METHODS: MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and ISI Web of Science® were searched to September 2015. Selected conference proceedings were searched from 2012 to July 2015. Studies disclosing biosimilars with unique identifiers were categorized by originator, study type, and indication. Risk of bias assessments were performed. Intended copies were differentiated as commercially available agents without evidence of rigorous comparative biosimilarity evaluations. RESULTS: Proposed biosimilars for adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and rituximab are reported in the published literature. Across indications, approved biosimilars infliximab CT-P13, SB2, and etanercept SB4 have published studies involving the largest number of patients or healthy subjects (n = 1405, 743, and 734, respectively), mostly in rheumatoid arthritis. At data cut-off, only CT-P13 had published data in ankylosing spondylitis (n = 250; randomized control trial) and ulcerative colitis/Crohn's disease (n = 336; observational studies). Published data were not available for ongoing studies in psoriasis patients. Four intended copies were identified in published studies (total: n = 1430; n = 1372 in observational studies). Thematic analysis of non-empirical publications showed that indication extrapolation remains an issue, particularly for gastroenterologists. CONCLUSIONS: While most agents display a moderate to high degree of similarity to their originator in the published studies identified, large discrepancies persist in the overall amount and type of data available in the public domain. Significant gaps exist particularly for intended copies, reinforcing the need to maintain a clear differentiation between these molecules and true biosimilars.

Patient attitudes and understanding about biosimilars: an international cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the levels of awareness, usage, and knowledge of biosimilars among patients, caregivers, and the general population in the US and the European Union; perceptions of biosimilars compared to originator biologics; perceived benefits and drawbacks of clinical trials; and whether advocacy groups impact patients' willingness to try a biosimilar. METHODS: An international survey was conducted which contained up to 56 closed-ended (requiring yes/no or ranking answers) and open-ended questions, depending on the population assigned. The survey was divided into distinct sections, including medication-class awareness, usage, and knowledge about biologic and biosimilar therapies; perceptions of clinical trials; and involvement in advocacy groups. Interviews were conducted in adults categorized as: 1) diagnosed: patients with inflammatory bowel disease including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; 2) diagnosed advocacy: individuals with these diseases who participated in patient support groups; 3) caregiver: has a loved one with these conditions and is involved in medical decisions; 4) general population: aged 18-64 years, without these conditions. Statistical analyses among groups within a region (US or EU) used column proportions test with a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: In all, 3,198 individuals responded. Awareness about biologic therapies was significantly higher in diagnosed, diagnosed advocacy, and caregiver groups (45%-78%) versus general population (27%; P<0.05). Across all groups, awareness of biosimilars was low; only 6% of the general population reported at least a general impression of biosimilars. Awareness was significantly higher in the diagnosed advocacy group (20%-30%; P<0.05). Gaps in knowledge about biosimilars included safety, efficacy, and access to these agents. Respondents had generally positive perceptions of clinical trials, although barriers to participation were identified. CONCLUSION: An immediate need exists for patient education about biosimilars and clinical trials to ensure educated and informed decisions are made about biosimilar use.

Clinical trial: endoscopic evaluation of naproxen etemesil, a naproxen prodrug, vs. naproxen - a proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator study.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with upper gastrointestinal mucosal injury. Naproxen etemesil is a lipophilic, non-acidic, inactive prodrug of naproxen that is hydrolysed to pharmacologically active naproxen once absorbed. We hypothesized that with lesser topical exposure to naproxen from the prodrug, there would be reduced gastroduodenal mucosal injury compared with naproxen. AIM: To compare the degree of endoscopic mucosal damage of naproxen etemesil vs. naproxen. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial compared oral naproxen etemesil 1200 mg twice daily (n = 61) with naproxen 500 mg twice daily (n = 59) for 7.5 days in 120 healthy subjects (45-70 years; mean 51 years; 58% female) with baseline total modified gastroduodenal Lanza score ≤ 2 (no erosions/ulcers) on endoscopy. The primary endpoint was mean total modified gastroduodenal Lanza score on day 7. A secondary endpoint was incidence of gastric ulcers. RESULTS: The day 7 mean total modified gastroduodenal Lanza score was 2.8 ± 1.7 for naproxen etemesil vs. 3.5 ± 2.0 for naproxen (P = 0.03), and significantly fewer naproxen etemesil-treated subjects (3.3%) developed gastric ulcers compared with naproxen-treated subjects (15.8%) (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In this first proof-of-concept study, naproxen etemesil was associated with significantly lower gastroduodenal mucosal injury compared with naproxen after 7 days of exposure ( CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00750243).

Phase 1 study of anti-CTGF monoclonal antibody in patients with diabetes and microalbuminuria.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This report summarizes the first phase 1 trial treating patients with microalbuminuric diabetic kidney disease (DKD) using FG-3019, a human monoclonal antibody to connective tissue growth factor (CTGF). CTGF is critically involved in processes of progressive fibrosis, including DKD. This phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation trial evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and possible therapeutic effects of FG-3019 on albuminuria, proteinuria, and tubular proteins. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: Microalbuminuric subjects (n = 24) with type 2 (79%) or type 1 (21%) diabetes received 3 or 10 mg/kg FG-3019 dosed intravenously every 14 days for four doses. Albuminuria and safety follow-up were to days 62 and 365, respectively. RESULTS: No infusion was interrupted for symptoms, although 5 of 24 subjects had mild infusion-day adverse events thought to be possibly drug-related. No subject developed anti-FG-3019 antibodies. FG-3019 clearance was lower at 10 mg/kg than at 3 mg/kg, suggesting a saturable elimination pathway. Although this study was not designed for efficacy testing, it was notable that urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) decreased significantly from mean pretreatment ACR of 48 mg/g to mean post-treatment (day 56) ACR of 20 mg/g (P = 0.027) without evidence for a dose-response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of microalbuminuric DKD subjects using FG-3019 was well tolerated and associated with a decrease in albuminuria. The data demonstrate a saturable pathway for drug elimination, minimal infusion adverse events, and no significant drug-attributable adverse effects over the year of follow-up. Changes in albuminuria were promising but require validation in a prospective, randomized, blinded study.

Gene polymorphisms and serological markers of patients with active Crohn's disease in a clinical trial of antisense to ICAM-1.

Serological profiles for anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA)/ perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA) and gene polymorphisms in tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) are associated with occurrence and/or outcome in Crohn's disease. The aim of the study was to characterize the ASCA/pANCA profile, soluble ICAM-1 expression and single nucleotide gene polymorphisms (SNPs) in TNF-alpha and ICAM-1 genes. Crohn's patients with moderate disease activity were enrolled in a clinical trial of Alicaforsen (ISIS 2302). Peripheral blood samples were collected prospectively for serum studies and for potential analysis of gene polymorphisms. A multivariate analysis was performed to compare treatment effect with the biomarkers studied. Serological testing for ASCA/pANCA was obtained for 257 patients at baseline: 37% were ASCA(+)/pANCA(-) (Crohn's pattern), 9% had both markers, 15% were ASCA(-)/pANCA(+) and 39% had neither marker. When the data were analysed by multiple regression analysis, a trend was found within the Alicaforsen-treated groups for greater rates of remission in the ASCA(+)/pANCA(-) subgroup versus all other serological profiles (25 versus 14%, P = 0.068), but not versus the placebo remission rate (18.8%). Gene polymorphisms were assessed in 64 patients, 21 from the placebo group. ICAM-1 assessment revealed no over-representation. However, three unique TNF-alpha SNPs were identified that correlated significantly with remission; sites 290 (P = 0.0253), -2735 (P = 0.0317) and -3090 (P = 0.0067). Although the overall clinical trial was negative, we have identified a trend towards clinical remission with Alicaforsen therapy in a subgroup of patients with Crohn's disease expressing ASCA(+)/pANCA(-). Furthermore, we have identified three TNF-alpha SNPs that may also predict a positive therapeutic outcome.

Prediction of clinical responses in a simulated phase III trial of Crohn's patients administered the antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotide ISIS 2302: comparison of proposed dosing regimens.

ISIS 2302, an antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotide (ODN) targeting human intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) mRNA, is currently being evaluated for treatment of patients with Crohn's disease. From data collected in phase II clinical studies with ISIS 2302, validated population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response models were developed and used to simulate the plasma exposure and clinical response results for a proposed phase III trial design involving 100 patients treated with active drug and 50 patients treated with placebo. Simulated results of 1000 replications of the trial were calculated for various proposed dosing regimens. Overall, the simulated results indicated that a fixed dose regimen (250-400 mg, depending on patient sex and total body weight) given three times weekly provides both desirable ISIS 2302 plasma exposure and a high rate of clinical response in this patient population. However, the simulated results also suggest that inclusion of a larger number of patients than projected may be necessary to provide a desirable probability of study success (i.e., >80%), regarding demonstration of statistically significant differences between the active treatment and placebo groups for the primary clinical response measure (CCR rate).

Phase I trial of ISIS 104838, a 2'-methoxyethyl modified antisense oligonucleotide targeting tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

ISIS 104838 is a 20-mer phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) that binds tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) mRNA. It carries a 2'-methoxyethyl modification on the five 3' and 5' nucleotide sugars, with 10 central unmodified deoxynucleotides. ISIS 104838 was identified from a 264 ASO screen in phorbol myristate acetate-activated keratinocytes, and the dose response was assessed in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated monocytes. Healthy males received multiple intravenous (i.v.) ISIS 104838 infusions in a placebo-controlled dose escalation trial (0.1-6 mg/kg). Additional volunteers received single or multiple subcutaneous (s.c.) injections. ISIS 104838 suppressed TNF-alpha protein by 85% in stimulated keratinocytes. The IC50 for TNF-alpha mRNA inhibition in stimulated monocytes was <1 microM. For i.v., C(max) occurred at the end of infusion. The effective plasma half-life was 15 to 45 min at 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg and 1 to 1.8 h for higher doses. The apparent terminal plasma elimination half-life approximated 25 days. Obese subjects had higher plasma levels following equivalent mg/kg doses. For s.c. injections, C(max) occurred at 2 to 4 h and was lower than with equivalent i.v. dosing. Plasma bioavailability compared with i.v. was 82% following a 200 mg/ml s.c. injection. Transient activated partial thromboplastin time prolongation occurred after i.v. infusions and minimally after s.c. injections. Two subjects experienced rash, one a reversible platelet decrease, and mild injection site tenderness was noted. TNF-alpha production by peripheral blood leukocytes, induced ex vivo by LPS, was decreased by ISIS 104838 (p < 0.01). ISIS 104838, a second-generation antisense oligonucleotide, was generally well tolerated intravenously and subcutaneously. The pharmacokinetics support an infrequent dosing interval. Inhibition of TNF-alpha production ex vivo was demonstrated.

Dose ranging pharmacokinetic trial of high-dose alicaforsen (intercellular adhesion molecule-1 antisense oligodeoxynucleotide) (ISIS 2302) in active Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotide alicaforsen (ISIS 2302) at 250-350 mg in Crohn's disease. METHODS: : Patients (> 50 kg) with active Crohn's disease (Crohn's disease activity index > or = 220) were assigned by gender, randomly, to two alicaforsen treatment groups: 300 or 350 mg, infused intravenously three times a week for 4 weeks. All patients weighing 36-50 kg received 250 mg of alicaforsen. Background aminosalicylates, antibiotics, immunosuppressives and corticosteroids were permitted, but tumour necrosis factor-alphainhibitors were prohibited. The primary end-point was clinical remission (Crohn's disease activity index < or = 150). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled with a mean baseline Crohn's disease activity index of 304. Steroids were used by 27%, 5-aminosalicylic acid by 68% and immunosuppressives by 27%; 23% had previously received infliximab. Five subjects withdrew after one to three infusions for infusion-related symptoms. Nine patients (41%) experienced clinical remission. Fifty-three per cent of the evaluable subjects receiving more than three infusions experienced remission (18% at week 8; 29% at week 12). The overall response, using a minimum decrease of 70 in the Crohn's disease activity index, was 41-47% for the evaluable group, at weeks 8 and 12. The median duration of remission was 14 weeks. Plasma pharmacokinetic results showed overlapping levels (Cmax, AUC) for the three doses. The infusion-related reaction profile consisted of fever, chills, headache, nausea, emesis or arthralgias, typically occurring 2-4 h after completion of the first infusion. Reactions were less frequent in patients receiving background corticosteroids. The 2-4-h transient post-infusion partial thromboplastin time prolongation values, a class effect of phosphorothioate oligonucleotides, were 18, 21 and 23 s for 250, 300 and 350 mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Alicaforsen (ISIS 2302), at fixed doses of 300 and 350 mg, achieved the desired drug exposure and may be an effective therapy for Crohn's disease. Infusion-related reactions were observed less frequently in patients on corticosteroids, and with decreasing frequency with continued treatment.

Recent interview-based measures of competency to stand trial: a critical review augmented with research data.

Forensic experts are frequently asked to conduct competency-to-stand trial evaluations and address the substantive prongs propounded in Dusky v. United States (1960). In understanding its application to competency evaluations, alternative conceptualizations of Dusky are critically examined. With Dusky providing the conceptual framework, three interview-based competency measures are reviewed: the Georgia Court Competency Test (GCCT), the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication (Mac-CAT-CA), and the Evaluation of Competency to Stand Trial-Revised (ECST-R). This review has a twin focus on reliability of each measure and its correspondence to Dusky prongs. The current review is augmented by new factor analytic data on the MacCAT-CA and ECST-R. The article concludes with specific recommendations for competency evaluations.

Word valence, attention, and hemispheric activity in depressed, remitted, and nondepressed controls.

Clinically depressed (n = 20), previously depressed (n = 28), and nondepressed control (n = 27) individuals, classified according to a structured clinical diagnostic interview, participated in a study employing a modified prior entry (Titchener, 1908) procedure to investigate interrelationships among word (adjective) valence, visual attention, and cerebral hemispheric activity. Overall, positive words were selected more quickly when presented to the right, versus left, visual field (RVF, LVF); the opposite pattern was observed for negative words. While there was no significant group X Valence X Visual Field interaction, planned comparisons revealed that the aforementioned Valence X Visual Field interaction was significant only for the nondepressed control group. Although the remitted group exhibited an overall pattern similar to the control group, the depressed group evinced a pattern in the opposite direction for positive words (i.e., quicker in the LVF than the RVF).