Relatives Experience More Psychological Distress Due to COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Visitation Restrictions Than In-Patients.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to visiting restrictions (VRs) of patients in hospitals. Social contacts between patients' relatives play an important role in convalescence. Isolation may cause new psychological comorbidity. The present study investigated the psychological distress of VR in in-patients and their relatives. Methods: From April 1, 2020 to May 20, 2020, 313 in-patients (≥14 years) of the University Medical Center Rostock were interviewed by questionnaires and 51 relatives by phone. Subjective psychological distress was assessed by a distress thermometer [0 (not at all)-100 (extreme)]. The study also investigated stressors due to VR, psychological distress in dependence on demographic or disease-related data, currently used communication channels and desired alternatives and support. Results: Relatives were more psychologically distressed by VR than in-patients (59 ± 34 vs. 38 ± 30, p = 0.002). Loss of direct physical contact and facial expressions/gestures resulted in the most distress. Psychological distress due to VR was independent of demographics and indicates small positive correlations with the severity of physical restriction and the general psychological distress of in-patients. The most frequent ways of communication were via phone and social media. Frequently requested alternatives for patients were other interlocutors and free phone/tablet use, for relatives visiting rooms with partitions. Conclusion: VRs are a stressor for patients and their relatives. The establishment of visiting rooms with partitions and the free use of phones/tablets could reduce the additional distress.

Longitudinal observation of anxiety and depression among palliative care cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depressive symptoms are commonly reported to have a high prevalence in advanced cancer patients. However, whether the severity of the symptoms change during a stay in a palliative care unit (PCU) and after discharge home has not been studied thus far. This prospective, longitudinal, single-center study screened for anxiety and depression as measured on the German version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) in a palliative care (PC) cancer cohort at three different time points. METHODS: Consecutive patients (N=206) admitted to a PCU were evaluated of whom N=102 could be enrolled. Patients were screened for anxiety and depression using the HADS-D questionnaire: 24 h after admittance (P1), within 24 h before discharge (P2) and 2 weeks after discharge (P3). Longitudinal changes and influencing factors were determined. RESULTS: Nearly 80% of all patients had at least at one time point a HADS score ≥8 indicating a clinically meaningful symptom burden. The P1 mean scores were 7.1±3.3 (anxiety) and 8.9±4.6 (depression). Depression was associated with underlying cancer type (P<0.05). Anxiety and depression stabilized during hospitalization (P2). However, a significant deterioration after discharge (P3) was observed (anxiety P=0.046; depression P=0.003), in particular in older patients (>65 years) and higher ECOG status (≥3). Patients with a short time since first diagnosis (<1 year) had significantly higher symptom burden compared to patients with a longer disease course. Participation was 50% emphasizing the difficulty to study PC patients. Most patients had advanced cancers (99%). Underlying cancer types consisted of a broad variety of solid tumors including 15% hematological cases. Median survival was 1.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms points to the need for psychological support. All PC patients should be screened for psychological distress to identify those in need of further assessment and treatment. The deterioration at home suggests the need for improved outpatient management, including home-based psychological support. Caregivers should be aware of the psychological vulnerability of newly diagnosed cancer patients, patients with lower functional status and higher age.

Questionnaires measuring quality of life and satisfaction of patients and their relatives in a palliative care setting-German translation of FAMCARE-2 and the palliative care subscale of FACIT-Pal.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction with care in palliative care patients and their relatives is an important aspect of palliative care research, likewise important to get a direct feedback for the success of treatment. Here, questionnaires are important tools for measuring outcomes of care in medicine. Several validated, predominantly English, questionnaires already exist. These have been translated in different languages but German. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) is an established tool for the evaluation of QoL in cancer patients. The FACIT-Pal, a 46-itemquestionnaire of this group of questionnaires, measures the QoL in palliative care patients. It includes a new palliative care subscale which is not yet available in German. The FAMCARE-2, a 17-item-questionnaire, evaluates the relatives' satisfaction with the care and support they received from palliative care team. METHODS: The translation process followed a protocol including multiple independent translators as well as a forth and back translation. RESULTS: A German version of FAMCARE-2 and FACIT-Pal was translated based on the original questionnaire. Relevant differences between the English original versions and the back translations weren't revealed by the original scale developers. CONCLUSIONS: The final versions of the German translations have been authorized by the scale developers. The FAMCARE-2 and the FACIT-Pal are now available in German and can be used for research and quality control purposes.