Arrhythmias and laboratory abnormalities after an electrical accident: a single-center, retrospective study of 333 cases.

BACKGROUND: Even though electrical injuries are common in the emergency room, guidelines, consensus, and general recommendations for the management of these patients do not exist in Europe. Documented cases of delayed arrhythmias are rare and their connection with electrical injury has not been fully confirmed. We also use cardio-specific markers for the risk stratification of myocardial injury, but there is no significant study referring to their utility in this clinical situation. These reasons led us to retrospectively analyze all cases of electrical injuries over 23 years to determine the prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias (mainly malignant arrhythmias and delayed arrhythmias). METHODS: We retrospectively searched all patients admitted to the University Hospital in Pilsen, CZ, with a diagnosis of electric injury (ICD diagnostic code T754) from 1997 to 2020. The hospital´s information system was used to research the injury; data were drawn from patient medical records. RESULTS: We identified 333 cases of electrical injury in our hospital. Men accounted for about two-thirds, and women one-third. Children accounted for about one-third of cases. Most were low-voltage injuries (< 1000 V, 91.6%). All participants had an initial ECG, and 77.5% of patients had continuous ECG monitoring, usually lasting 24 h. Cardiac arrhythmias were noticed in 39 patients (11.7%). The most frequent arrhythmias were: ventricular fibrillation, sinus tachycardia, bradycardia and arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, and supraventricular tachycardia. The ECG showed cardiac conduction abnormalities in 28 patients (8.1%), and ten patients (3%) had supraventricular or ventricular extrasystoles. In ten cases (3%), we found changes in ST segments and T waves on the initial ECG. Thirty-one patients (9.3%) suffered a loss of consciousness and 50 patients (15.02%) reported paresthesia. The most frequent ion disbalances were hypokalemia (18%) and hypocalcemia (3.3%). Patients with an ion disbalance had significantly more arrhythmias and newly diagnosed cardiac conduction abnormalities. Troponin levels (cTnI or hs-cTnT) were measured in 258 cases (77.48%) and found to be elevated above the 99th percentile in 19 cases (5.7%). Almost one-third of patients had burns of various degrees of seriousness, and 41 patients (12.3%) had concomitant traumatic injuries. Eleven patients underwent pre-hospital resuscitation, three died in the hospital, and another died as result of intracranial hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: All malignant arrhythmias occurred immediately after the electrical injury, delayed life-threatening arrhythmias were not observed, and no predictive factors of malignant arrhythmias were found. While elevations of cardiac troponins were observed sporadically, they did not appear helpful for risk stratification. In patients with arrhythmias, ion disbalance may be more critical. We concluded that asymptomatic, uninjured adult and pediatric patients with normal initial ECG findings do not need continuous ECG monitoring and may be discharged home. Recommendations for high-risk patients and patients with mild ECG abnormalities at admission are less obvious.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock: Results of the ECMO-CS Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly being used for circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock, although the evidence supporting its use in this context remains insufficient. The ECMO-CS trial (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock) aimed to compare immediate implementation of VA-ECMO versus an initially conservative therapy (allowing downstream use of VA-ECMO) in patients with rapidly deteriorating or severe cardiogenic shock. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated, academic clinical trial included patients with either rapidly deteriorating or severe cardiogenic shock. Patients were randomly assigned to immediate VA-ECMO or no immediate VA-ECMO. Other diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were performed as per current standards of care. In the early conservative group, VA-ECMO could be used downstream in case of worsening hemodynamic status. The primary end point was the composite of death from any cause, resuscitated circulatory arrest, and implementation of another mechanical circulatory support device at 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were randomized; after excluding 5 patients because of the absence of informed consent, 117 subjects were included in the analysis, of whom 58 were randomized to immediate VA-ECMO and 59 to no immediate VA-ECMO. The composite primary end point occurred in 37 (63.8%) and 42 (71.2%) patients in the immediate VA-ECMO and the no early VA-ECMO groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.46-1.12]; P=0.21). VA-ECMO was used in 23 (39%) of no early VA-ECMO patients. The 30-day incidence of resuscitated cardiac arrest (10.3.% versus 13.6%; risk difference, -3.2 [95% CI, -15.0 to 8.5]), all-cause mortality (50.0% versus 47.5%; risk difference, 2.5 [95% CI, -15.6 to 20.7]), serious adverse events (60.3% versus 61.0%; risk difference, -0.7 [95% CI, -18.4 to 17.0]), sepsis, pneumonia, stroke, leg ischemia, and bleeding was not statistically different between the immediate VA-ECMO and the no immediate VA-ECMO groups. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate implementation of VA-ECMO in patients with rapidly deteriorating or severe cardiogenic shock did not improve clinical outcomes compared with an early conservative strategy that permitted downstream use of VA-ECMO in case of worsening hemodynamic status. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02301819.