Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty versus thrombolysis in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction and grade II and grade III myocardial ischemia on the enrollment electrocardiogram.

We investigated the impact of primary angioplasty compared with thrombolysis in 894 patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction and electrocardiographic grades II and III ischemia on enrollment. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the enrollment electrocardiogram-grade III: (1) absence of an S wave below the isoelectric baseline in leads that usually have a terminal S configuration (leads V(1) to V(3)), or (2) ST J-point amplitude > or =50% of the R-wave amplitude in all other leads. To be included in the grade III group, grade III criteria in > or =2 adjacent leads were required. Patients with ST elevation but without grade III criteria were classified as having grade II. In-hospital mortality was 3.2% and 6.8% in the grade II (n = 616) and grade III (n = 278) groups, respectively (p = 0.016). In the grade II group, in-hospital mortality was similar in the thrombolysis and angioplasty subgroups (3.2% and 3.3%, p = 0.941). In patients with grade III, in-hospital mortality was 6.4% and 7.3%, respectively (p = 0.762). The odds ratio for the grade III group for death with thrombolysis was 2.06 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.82 to 5.19; p = 0.125); the odds ratio for primary angioplasty was 2.30 (95% CI 0.93 to 5.66; p = 0.07). In the thrombolysis group, reinfarction occurred in 3.3% and 6.5% of the grade II and grade III subgroups (p = 0.137). In the angioplasty group, reinfarction occurred in 1.3% and 4.4%, respectively (p = 0.239). Grade III ischemia on admission was associated with higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality and a higher rate of reinfarction. There was no difference in mortality between primary angioplasty and thrombolysis in the grade II and grade III ischemia patients.

Electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: Current concepts for the clinician.

BACKGROUND: Over the past 2 decades, the 12-lead electrocardiogram has attained special significance for the diagnosis and triage of patients with chest pain because timely detection of myocardial injury and a rapid assessment of myocardium at risk proved pivotal to implementing effective reperfusion therapies during acute myocardial infarction. However, this wealth of information could still be underutilized by clinicians who may restrict their diagnostic quest in patients with chest pain to the more classic electrocardiographic signs. METHODS: The medical literature on electrocardiographic manifestations of acute myocardial infarction was extensively reviewed. RESULTS: The widespread utilization of both coronary angiography and methods to determine myocardial function and metabolism in patients with acute myocardial infarction over the last 10 years has provided the means for rigorous comparisons with electrocardiographic information. We summarize these electrocardiographic signs and patterns in terms of their relevance to the clinician to help reduce the incidence of "nondiagnostic electrocardiograms" and improve timely decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: The electrocardiogram continues to be an invaluable tool in the initial evaluation of patients with chest pain. The plethora of data currently available on electrocardiographic changes correlating with myocardial injury allows clinicians to make faster and better decisions than ever before.

Standards for the function of an academic 12-lead electrocardiographic core laboratory.

An academic 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) core laboratory aims to provide the highest possible quality ECG recording, measurement, and storage to aid clinicians in research into important cardiovascular outcomes and to maximize the credibility of scientific results based solely, or in part, on ECG data. This position paper presents a guide for the structure and function of an academic ECG core laboratory. The key functional aspects are: 1) Data collection, 2) Staff composition, 3) Diagnostic measurement and definition standards, 4) Data management, 5) Academic considerations, 6) Economic consideration, and 7) Accreditation. An ECG Core Laboratory has the responsibility for rapid and accurate analysis and responsible management of the electrocardiographic data in multicenter clinical trials. Academic Laboratories, in addition, provide leadership in research protocol generation and production of research manuscripts for submission to the appropriate peer-review journals.

Interobserver agreement in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the interobserver agreement between cardiologists and emergency physicians in the ECG diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) using the ECG algorithm previously described by Sgarbossa et al. METHODS: Using the Sgarbossa ECG algorithm, 4 cardiologists and 4 emergency physicians independently interpreted a test set of 224 ECGs with LBBB, of which 100 ECGs were from patients with an evolving AMI. A subset of 25 ECGs was reinterpreted by each reader to test intraobserver agreement for AMI as well as interobserver agreement for the degree of ST-segment deviation. Agreement rates for AMI were estimated using the kappa statistic. In addition, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing AMI were determined for each reader, using the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO I) enzyme criteria for AMI as the gold standard. The study was conducted at 3 university-affiliated medical centers. The test set contained ECGs from 100 patients enrolled in the GUSTO I trial with LBBB on their initial ECG and an evolving AMI confirmed by serum cardiac enzyme changes, and 124 control patients from the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease who had stable, angiographically documented coronary artery disease and LBBB. RESULTS: There was excellent interobserver agreement (kappa=0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80 to 0.83) between cardiologists and emergency physicians for diagnosing AMI. Intraobserver agreement kappa values for AMI diagnosis by cardiologists and emergency physicians were 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.94) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.89). The median sensitivity for diagnosing AMI by cardiologists and emergency physicians was 73% (range 66% to 80%) versus 67% (range 61% to 75%); median specificity was 98% (range 97% to 99%) versus 99% (range 98% to 99%). Spearman rank correlation coefficients for the degree of ST-segment deviation in all 12 leads was 0.86 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.87) among all readers. CONCLUSION: There is excellent interobserver agreement between cardiologists and emergency physicians for diagnosing AMI when applying the Sgarbossa ECG algorithm to patients with LBBB. Emergency physicians should be able to reliably use this algorithm when evaluating patients.

Negative T waves shortly after ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction are a powerful marker for improved survival rate.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported that negative T waves in the setting of acute coronary events are associated with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 3 in the infarct-related artery and with improved parameters of ventricular function rather than with ischemia. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) angiographic substudy (ie, patients with acute infarction randomly assigned to one of 4 thrombolytic regimens who then underwent coronary angiography) were included in this study if they survived at least 24 hours and had no confounding electrocardiographic factors (n = 1505). RESULTS: More patients had negative T waves develop (NT group, n = 938 [62%]) than not (PT group, n = 567 [38%]). Peak creatine kinase MB, time to thrombolysis, and randomization to accelerated alteplase were no different between the groups. Thirty days after admission, 12 patients in the NT group had died versus 25 patients in the PT group (1.3% vs. 4.4%; P <.001; odds ratio for negative T waves 0.28; 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.56). The difference persisted when only patients who survived at least 3 days were analyzed. After adjusting for relevant covariates (including presence of new Q waves in the follow-up electrocardiogram), negative T waves were an independent predictor for survival (P =. 007; odds ratio for negative T waves 0.38; 95% confidence interval 0. 18-0.78). Patients in the NT group were 35% more likely to have achieved patency of the infarct-related artery, although this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Negative T waves shortly after acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis were markers for improved 30-day survival rate. This finding merits prospective testing.

Use of resources, quality of life, and clinical outcomes in patients with and without new Q waves after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (from the GUSTO-I trial).

Previous reports indicate that patients who do not develop Q waves after thrombolytic therapy are a different population with a better long-term survival than those who do develop Q waves. However, the use of resources, quality of life, and health status of this population have not been fully evaluated. Using data from the Economics and Quality of Life subset of the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and tPA for Occluded Arteries study, we examined 30-day and 1-year mortality, use of resources, and quality-of-life measures among 1,830 of 3,000 patients with acute myocardial infarction and ST-segment elevation treated with thrombolytic therapy. At hospital discharge, 555 patients (30.2%) had not developed Q waves. These patients had lower mortality than patients with Q waves at 30 days (1.6% vs 4.5%, p <0.01) and at 1 year (4.7% vs 6.8%, p <0.04). Recurrent chest pain and dyspnea were similar at 30 days and 1 year. Patients without Q waves had significantly more angiography and trends toward higher readmission, revascularization, and use of calcium antagonists at 30 days. Angiography, revascularization, readmission, and quality of life were equivalent from 30 days to 1 year, with no sign of late instability. Logistic regression analysis showed an association between in-hospital revascularization and better survival and quality of life at 1 year. Conversely, there was no association between in-hospital use of calcium antagonists and outcome to explain the lower mortality in non-Q-wave patients. The absence of Q waves after thrombolytic therapy is a marker of success, implying better prognosis and equivalent quality of life, use of resources, and health status than for patients with Q-wave acute myocardial infarction and no sign of long-term unstable clinical course.

Clinical characteristics of patients intolerant to VVIR pacing.

The incidence and clinical predictors of the development of intolerance to VVIR pacing have not been extensively studied in prospective long-term randomized trials comparing different pacing modes. The frequency and clinical factors predicting intolerance to ventricular pacing are controversial. The Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly (PASE) Trial enrolled 407 patients aged >/=65 years in a 30-month, single-blind, randomized, controlled comparison of quality of life and clinical outcomes with ventricular pacing and dual-chamber pacing in patients undergoing dual-chamber pacemaker implantation for standard clinically accepted indications. We reviewed the clinical, hemodynamic, and electrophysiologic variables at the time of pacemaker implantation in 204 patients enrolled in the PASE trial and randomized to the VVIR mode, some of whom subsequently required crossover (reprogramming) to DDDR pacing. During a median follow-up of 555 days, 53 patients (26%) crossed over from VVIR to DDDR pacing. A decrease in systolic blood pressure during ventricular pacing at the time of pacemaker implantation (p = 0.001), use of beta blockers at the time of randomization (p = 0.01), and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (p = 0.04) were the only variables that predicted crossover in the Cox multivariate regression model. After reprogramming to the dual-chamber mode, patients showed improvement in all aspects of quality of life, with significant improvements in physical and emotional role. The high incidence of crossover from VVIR to DDDR pacing along with significant improvements in quality of life after crossover to DDDR pacing strongly favors dual-chamber pacing compared with single-chamber ventricular pacing in elderly patients requiring permanent pacing.

Value of the ECG in suspected acute myocardial infarction with left bundle branch block.

Uncomplicated left bundle branch block (LBBB) is characterized by true ST-segment shifts resulting from delayed repolarization in the left ventricle with respect to the right ventricle. When acute coronary occlusions develop in the setting of previous or new LBBB, 12-lead eCG manifestations of injury may also appear. They consist of a more pronounced ST-segment elevation, of ST-segment deviations opposite to those of uncomplicated LBBB, or both. We have reported that the only 3 independent ECG signs of acute MI during LBBB among patients with chest pain or history of coronary disease are: ST elevation > or = 1 mm in leads with a positive QRS, ST-depression > or = 1 mm in V1 to V3, and ST elevation > or = 5 mm in leads with a negative QRS. In our study, the clinical prediction rule score values of these signs were 5; 3; and 2, respectively. A score > or = 3 made a diagnosis of MI with a 90% specificity and a score of 2 with > 80%, specificity. Recent validation studies have confirmed that the presence of any of these ECG signs is associated with a sensitivity of 44 to 79% and a specificity of 93 to 100%. Sensitivity increases if serial or previous ECGs are available for comparison. Interobserver agreement is very high. While current practice guidelines recommend thrombolysis for all patients with chest pain and LBBB, concern among physicians about hemorrhagic stroke prevents many of these patients from receiving timely treatment. In a population with LBBB and chest pain where our proposed ECG criteria were not ascertained, only 73% of eligible patients received thrombolysis; on the other hand, 48% of patients with no biochemical evidence of MI were thrombolyzed. For the latter group, the clinical prediction rule had a score of 0. Instead, 79% of patients with confirmed acute MI had a prediction rule score > or =2. Similar values applied to a subgroup of patients with serial ECGs. We propose that thrombolysis among patients with chest pain and LBBB be decided on the basis of a systematic ECG review to "rule patients in". This provision may result in both a significant reduction in the number of patients without infarction who receive thrombolysis and in timely treatment of those who do have MI.

The correlation between presenting ST-segment depression and the final size of acute myocardial infarcts in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

The use of reperfusion therapy in patients with ST elevation acute coronary syndromes had been established. However, reperfusion therapy is usually considered contra-indicated in those with ST depression, despite the knowledge that regional posterior infarction is typically indicated by ST depression maximal in leads V1 to V3 and nonregional subendocardial infarction is typically indicated by marked ST depression maximal in other leads. This study of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes investigates the quantitative relationship between presenting ST depression and final QRS changes in both of these subgroups. The final QRS score was significantly higher (2.44 points) than that of a control group with not ST depression, (1.55 points) in the group with maximal ST depression in V1 to V3 (P = 0.04). However, in the entire population, there was a highly significant correlation (P = .003) between the sum of the presenting ST depression and the final QRS score. Trials of reperfusion therapy will be required to determine if such evolution to electrocardiogram documented acute myocardial infarction can be prevented in patient with marked ST depression acute coronary syndromes.

A comparison of 50-J versus 100-J shocks for direct-current cardioversion of atrial flutter.

BACKGROUND: Direct-current cardioversion remains the gold standard for restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial flutter. Although an initial energy of 50 J is recommended, the optimal energy settings have not been evaluated in a large series of contemporary patients. METHODS: We compared the outcome of cardioversion with 50 J versus 100 J in 330 consecutive patients with atrial flutter. Initial energy was based on attending physician preference. One hundred sixty patients received 50 J and 170 patients received 100 J. RESULTS: Patients in both groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, weight, body mass index, duration of the arrhythmia, postoperative status, presence and type of structural heart disease, or use of antiarrhythmic drugs. Patients in the 100-J group had more first shock conversion (85% vs 70%; P =. 001), fewer total shocks (1.2 +/- 0.5 vs 1.4 +/- 0.7; P =.001), and less induction of atrial fibrillation (2% vs 11%; P =.002). There were no significant differences in overall restoration of sinus rhythm, cumulative energy delivered, anesthetic dose, and procedure room time. On multivariate analysis, delivery of 100 J was the strongest predictor of first shock success (odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 2.13 to 3.16; P <.001). CONCLUSION: An initial energy of 100 J is more efficient for restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial flutter.

Predictors of in-hospital bundle branch block reversion after presenting with acute myocardial infarction and bundle branch block. GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries.

Patients with acute myocardial infarction and bundle branch block have a higher mortality rate and more in-hospital complications than patients with normal intraventricular conduction. Patients whose conduction defects revert have an improved prognosis (with outcomes similar to patients who never develop bundle branch block); thus, we analyzed potential predictors of bundle branch block reversion.

Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Standard clinical practice permits the use of either single-chamber ventricular pacemakers or dual-chamber pacemakers for most patients who require cardiac pacing. Ventricular pacemakers are less expensive, but dual-chamber pacemakers are believed to be more physiologic. However, it is not known whether either type of pacemaker results in superior clinical outcomes. METHODS: The Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly study was a 30-month, single-blind, randomized, controlled comparison of ventricular pacing and dual-chamber pacing in 407 patients 65 years of age or older in 29 centers. Patients received a dual-chamber pacemaker that had been randomly programmed to either ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing. The primary end point was health-related quality of life as measured by the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey. RESULT: The average age of the patients was 76 years (range, 65 to 96), and 60 percent were men. Quality of life improved significantly after pacemaker implantation (P<0.001), but there were no differences between the two pacing modes in either the quality of life or prespecified clinical outcomes (including cardiovascular events or death). However, 53 patients assigned to ventricular pacing (26 percent) were crossed over to dual-chamber pacing because of symptoms related to the pacemaker syndrome. Patients with sinus-node dysfunction, but not those with atrioventricular block, had moderately better quality of life and cardiovascular functional status with dual-chamber pacing than with ventricular pacing. Trends of borderline statistical significance in clinical end points favoring dual-chamber pacing were observed in patients with sinus-node dysfunction, but not in those with atrioventricular block. CONCLUSION: The implantation of a permanent pacemaker improves health-related quality of life. However, the quality-of-life benefits associated with dual-chamber pacing as compared with ventricular pacing are observed principally in the subgroup of patients with sinus-node dysfunction.

Non-Q-wave versus Q-wave myocardial infarction after thrombolytic therapy: angiographic and prognostic insights from the global utilization of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator for occluded coronary arteries-I angiographic substudy. GUSTO-I Angiographic Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Although the stratification of patients with myocardial infarction into ECG subsets based on the presence or absence of new Q waves has important clinical and prognostic utility, systematic evaluation of the impact of thrombolytic therapy on the subsequent development and prognosis of non-Q-wave infarction has been limited to date. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 12-lead ECG, coronary anatomy, left ventricular function, and mortality among 2046 patients with ST-segment elevation infarction from the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries angiographic subset to gain further insight into the pathophysiology and prognosis of Q- versus non-Q-wave infarction in the thrombolytic era. Non-Q-wave infarction developed in 409 patients (20%) after thrombolytic therapy. Compared with Q-wave patients, non-Q-wave patients were more likely to present with lesser ST-segment elevation in a nonanterior location. The infarct-related artery in non-Q-wave patients was more likely to be nonanterior (67% versus 58%, P=.012) and distally located (33% versus 39%, P=.021). Early (90-minute, 77% versus 65%, P=.001) and complete (54% versus 44%, P<.001) infarct-related artery patency was greater among the non-Q-wave group. Non-Q-wave patients had better global (ejection fraction, 66% versus 57%; P<.0001) and regional left ventricular function (10 versus 24 abnormal chords, P=.0001). In-hospital, 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year (6.3% versus 10.1%, P=.02) mortality rates were lower among non-Q-wave patients. CONCLUSIONS: The excellent prognosis among the subgroup of patients who develop non-Q-wave infarction after thrombolysis is related to early, complete, and sustained infarct-related artery patency with resultant limitation of left ventricular infarction and dysfunction.

Acute myocardial infarction and complete bundle branch block at hospital admission: clinical characteristics and outcome in the thrombolytic era. GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA [tissue-type plasminogen activator] for Occluded Coronary Arteries.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and bundle branch block in the thrombolytic era. BACKGROUND: Studies of patients with acute MI and bundle branch block have reported high mortality rates and poor overall prognosis. METHODS: The North American population with acute MI and bundle branch block enrolled in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA [tissue-type plasminogen activator] for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial was matched by age and Killip class with an equal number of GUSTO-I patients without conduction defects. RESULTS: Of all 26,003 North American patients in GUSTO-I, 420 (1.6%) had left (n = 131) or right (n = 289) bundle branch block. These patients had higher 30-day mortality rates than matched control subjects (18% vs. 11%, p = 0.003, odds ratio [OR] 1.8) and were more likely to experience cardiogenic shock (19% vs. 11%, p = 0.008, OR 1.78) or atrioventricular block/asystole (30% vs. 19%, p < 0.012, OR 1.57) and to require ventricular pacing (18% vs. 11%, p = 0.006, OR 1.73). Bundle branch block also carried an independent 53% higher risk for 30-day mortality. Thirty-day mortality rates for patients with complete, partial and no reversion of the bundle branch block were 8%, 12% and 20%, respectively (two-tailed chi-square test for trend 5.61, p = 0.02, OR 0.34 for complete reversion, OR 0.55 for partial reversion). CONCLUSIONS: Bundle branch block at hospital admission in patients with acute MI predicts in-hospital complications and poor short-term survival.

Thrombolysis and Q wave versus non-Q wave first acute myocardial infarction: a GUSTO-I substudy. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Arteries Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the outcomes of patients with a first myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation, with and without the development of abnormal Q waves after thrombolysis. BACKGROUND: Prethrombolytic era studies report conflicting short-versus long-term mortality in the overall non-Q wave population, probably related to its heterogeneity. METHODS: Patients with no electrocardiographic (ECG) confounding factors or evidence of previous infarction were included. Q wave infarction was defined as a Q wave duration > or = 30 ms in lead aVF; R wave > or = 40 ms in lead V1; any Q wave or R wave < or = 10 ms and < or = 0.1 mV in lead V2; or Q wave > or = 40 ms in at least two of the following leads: I, aVL, V4, V5 or V6. In-hospital clinical events and mortality at 30 days and 1 year were assessed. RESULTS: No Q waves developed in 4,601 (21.3%) of the 21,570 patients. This group comprised more women and had a lower Killip class, lower weight and less anterior baseline ST elevation. The non-Q wave group had less in-hospital cardiogenic shock (2.1% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.0001), less heart failure (8.5% vs. 13.9%, p < 0.0001) and a trend toward less stroke (0.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.07) but an increased use of angioplasty (28% vs. 24%, p = 0.0001). The unadjusted mortality rate in the non-Q wave group was lower at 30 days (0.9% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.0001) and 1 year (2.7% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.0001), as was the adjusted 30-day mortality rate (4.8% vs. 5.3%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with no ECG confounding factors or evidence of previous infarction who do not develop Q waves after thrombolysis have a better 30-day and 1-year prognosis than patients with a Q wave infarction.