A Systematic Review of the Effect of N-Acetylcysteine on Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C Measurements.

INTRODUCTION: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is an antioxidant that can regenerate glutathione and is primarily used for acetaminophen overdose. NAC has been tested and used for preventing iatrogenic acute kidney injury or slowing the progression of chronic kidney disease, with mixed results. There are conflicting reports that NAC may artificially lower measured serum creatinine without improving kidney function, potentially by assay interference. Given these mixed results, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine whether there is an effect of NAC on kidney function as measured with serum creatinine and cystatin C. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify all study types reporting a change in serum creatinine after NAC administration. The primary outcome was change in serum creatinine after NAC administration. The secondary outcome was a change in cystatin C after NAC administration. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess effect of creatinine assay (Jaffe vs. non-Jaffe and intravenous vs. oral). RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 199 participants were eligible for the systematic review and meta-analysis. There was a small but significant decrease in serum creatinine after NAC administration overall (weighted mean difference [WMD], -2.80 µmol/L [95% confidence interval {CI} -5.6 to 0.0]; P = 0.05). This was greater with non-Jaffe methods (WMD, -3.24 µmol/L [95% CI -6.29 to -0.28]; P = 0.04) than Jaffe (WMD, -0.51 µmol/L [95% CI -7.56 to 6.53]; P = 0.89) and in particular with intravenous (WMD, -31.10 µmol/L [95% CI -58.37 to -3.83]; P = 0.03) compared with oral NAC (WMD, -2.5 µmol/L [95% CI -5.32 to 0.32]; P = 0.08). There was no change in cystatin C after NAC administration. DISCUSSION: NAC causes a decrease in serum creatinine but not in cystatin C, suggesting analytic interference rather than an effect on kidney function. Supporting this, the effect was greater with non-Jaffe methods of creatinine estimation. Future studies of NAC should use the Jaffe method of creatinine estimation when kidney outcomes are being reported. Even in clinical settings, the use of an enzymatic assay when high doses of intravenous NAC are being used may result in underdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of acute kidney injury.

Percutaneous Image-Guided Biopsy of the Spleen: Experience at a Single Tertiary Care Center.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the complication rate of percutaneous image-guided biopsy of the spleen at our institution and to evaluate for variables associated with complication rate. METHODS: This is a Research Ethics Board approved retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent image-guided biopsy of the spleen at our institution from January 2010 to November 2019. Complications, imaging findings, and pathologic diagnosis were reviewed. Complications (major and minor) were classified per Society of Interventional Radiology Guidelines, and complication rate was calculated. Logistic regression was applied to determine factors associated with complications. Diagnostic yield was calculated. RESULTS: In all, 55 patients (28 female) underwent splenic biopsy using ultrasound guidance. The most common indication was possible lymphoma in 41 (71.7%) patients followed by query metastasis 18 (31.5%) patients. Core biopsies (18 g/20 g) were done in 53 (92%) cases, and fine-needle aspiration (22 g) was performed in 4 (8%). The median number of samples collected was 4 (range: 2-9). The results were diagnostic in 54 cases (94.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.7-100.0). There were 12 (21%, 95% CI: 10.1-31.9) patients with minor complications and 2 (3.5%, 95% CI: 0.0-8.4) with major complications (2 splenic bleeds requiring embolization, no splenectomy, or deaths). No variables (needle size, lesion size, and number of passes) were associated with complication rate. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous image-guided biopsy of the spleen at a single tertiary care institution demonstrates major complication rate comparable to that in the literature with no variables associated with complication rate; there were no cases of splenectomy or death.

Gallbladder Cancer: Imaging Appearance and Pitfalls in Diagnosis [Formula: see text].

Gallbladder cancer is an uncommon malignancy with an overall poor prognosis. The clinical and imaging presentation of gallbladder cancer often overlaps with benign disease, making diagnosis difficult. Gallbladder cancer is most easily diagnosed on imaging when it presents as a mass replacing the gallbladder. At this stage, the prognosis is usually poor. Recognizing the features of gallbladder cancer early in the disease can enable complete resection and improve prognosis. Recognition of the patterns of wall enhancement on computed tomography can help differentiate gallbladder cancer from benign disease. Gallbladder wall thickening without pericholecystic fluid presenting in an older patient with raised alkaline phosphatase should raise concern regarding gallbladder cancer. Gallbladder polyps in high-risk individuals need close surveillance or surgery as per guidelines. Small gallbladder cancers in the neck can present as biliary dilatation or cholecystitis, and careful examination of this area is needed to assess for lesion. The imaging appearance of gallbladder cancer is reviewed and supported by local institutional data. Features that differentiate it from its common mimics enabling earlier diagnosis are described.

Prediction of Progression in Polycystic Kidney Disease Using the Kidney Failure Risk Equation and Ultrasound Parameters.

BACKGROUND: The kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) is a validated risk algorithm for predicting the risk of kidney failure in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients regardless of etiology. Patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (AD-PCKD) experience long disease trajectories and as such identifying individuals at risk of kidney failure would aid in intervention. OBJECTIVE: To examine the utility of the KFRE in predicting adverse kidney outcomes compared with existing risk factors in a cohort of patients with AD-PCKD. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of AD-PCKD patients referred to a tertiary care center with a baseline kidney ultrasound and a KFRE calculation. Cox proportional hazards were used to examine the association of the KFRE and composite of an eGFR decline of >30% or the need for dialysis/transplantation. Discrimination and calibration of a parsimonious fully adjusted model and a model containing only total kidney volume (TKV) with and without the addition of the KFRE was determined. RESULTS: Of 340 patients with AD-PCKD eligible, 221 (65%) met inclusion criteria. Older age, cardiac disease, cancer, higher systolic blood pressure, albuminuria, lower eGFR and a higher initial TKV were more common in patients with a higher KFRE. A total of 120 events occurred over a median patient follow-up time of 3.2 years. KFRE was independently associated with the composite kidney outcome. Addition of the KFRE significantly improved discrimination and calibration in a TKV only model and a fully adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse, referral population with AD-PCKD, the KFRE was associated with adverse kidney outcomes and improved risk prediction.

CONTEXTE: L'équation KFRE (kidney failure risk equation) est un algorithme validé pour prédire le risque de défaillance rénale chez les patients atteints d'IRC, quelle que soit l'étiologie. Les patients souffrant de polykystose rénale autosomique dominante (ADPKD) connaissent une longue trajectoire de maladie et, à ce titre, le dépistage des individus présentant un risque élevé d'insuffisance rénale pourrait faciliter les interventions. OBJECTIF: Examiner l'efficacité de la KFRE à prédire le risque d'issues rénales défavorables dans une cohorte de patients atteints d'ADPKD comparativement aux facteurs de risque existants. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Cette étude de cohorte rétrospective porte sur des patients atteints d'ADPKD aiguillés vers un centre de soins tertiaires avec une échographie rénale de référence et un calcul de KFRE. Un modèle de risques proportionnels de Cox a été employé pour analyser la relation entre la KFRE et un déclin composite du DFGe supérieur à 30% ou le besoin de dialyse ou de transplantation. La discrimination et la calibration d'un modèle parcimonieux entièrement corrigé et d'un modèle ne tenant compte que du volume rénal total (VRT), avec ou sans l'ajout de la KFRE, ont été déterminées. RÉSULTATS: Des 340 patients atteints d'ADPKD et admissibles à l'étude, 221 (65%) satisfaisaient les critères d'inclusion. Les patients présentant un résultat élevé à la KFRE étaient souvent plus âgés et étaient plus fréquemment atteints des troubles suivants: maladies cardiovasculaires, cancer, pression systolique élevée, albuminurie, faible DFGe et VRT initial plus élevé. Un total de 120 événements sont survenus au cours de la période de suivi médiane (3,2 ans). La KFRE a été associée de façon indépendante à l'issue rénale composite. L'ajout de la valeur de KFRE a considérablement amélioré la discrimination et la calibration des deux modèles employés (VRT seulement et modèle entièrement corrigé). CONCLUSION: L'utilisation de la KFRE a été associée à des issues rénales défavorables et à une meilleure prédiction du risque d'insuffisance rénale dans une population de référence diversifiée composée de patients atteints d'ADPKD.

Regional Standardization of Prostate Multiparametric MRI Performance and Reporting: Is There a Role for a Director of Prostate Imaging?

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) before and after intervention by a director of prostate imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Images from prostate mpMRI examinations at four peripheral institutions (five 1.5-T systems) were studied. DICOM headers were analyzed for T2-weighted, DWI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced technical specifications. Reports were retrieved, and a blinded radiologist compared them with those from the regional academic referral center (3-T system) and Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) technical specifications. Data were reevaluated after intervention by a director of prostate imaging. Comparisons were performed by chi-square analysis. RESULTS. Except for having insufficient DWI spatial resolution, the referral center fully complied with PI-RADSv2. For peripheral systems, compliance with PI-RADSv2 technical specifications improved from baseline to after intervention. For T2-weighted imaging, compliance with spatial resolution increased from 40% (two of five MRI systems) to 100% (all five systems) (p = 0.038). For DWI, spatial resolution compliance increased from 20% to 100%. For modified DWI, spatial resolution compliance to improve image quality at 1.5 T (matrix, 100 × 100; FOV, 28 × 28 cm; slice thickness, 4 mm) increased from 60% (b value ≥ 1400 s/mm2) to 100% (p = 0.114). For dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, spatial resolution compliance increased from 60% to 100% (p = 0.114), temporal resolution compliance increased from 20% (≤ 10 seconds) to 100% (p = 0.10), and acquisition time compliance increased from 60% (≥ 2 minutes) to 100% (p = 0.114). Only one of the four peripheral centers provided PI-RADSv2 scores, but all of them did after the intervention (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION. A director of prostate imaging may drive standardization of prostate MRI performance and reporting within specified geographic regions.

Diagnostic Yield and Complication Rate in Percutaneous Needle Biopsy of Renal Hilar Masses With Comparison With Renal Cortical Mass Biopsies in a Cohort of 195 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare diagnostic yield and complication rate in needle biopsy (NB) of renal hilar and cortical masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With institutional review board approval, we retrospectively studied 195 patients (120 men, 75 women; mean age ± SD, 67 ± 13 years old) who underwent ultrasound-guided renal mass NB between January 2013 and December 2017. Operator years of experience, biopsy technique (coaxial or successive), needle gauge (22-gauge fine-needle aspiration, 18-gauge core-needle, or both), number of passes, postprocedural complication, and histopathologic diagnoses were recorded. A radiologist who was blinded to histopathologic diagnoses recorded mass location (upper pole, interpolar region, lower pole) and percentage of hilar involvement. Comparisons were performed using independent t and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Of the masses biopsied, 5.6% (11/195) were 100% hilar (mean hilar involvement, 20.8% ± 29.8%; range, 0-100%). Mean lesion size was 44 ± 27 mm (range, 12-157 mm). NB diagnosis was established in 84.6% (165/195) of masses, and 15.4% (30/195) of biopsies were inconclusive, with no association with size (p = 0.55) or percentage of hilar involvement (p = 0.756). In the purely hilar masses, diagnosis was established in 72.7% (8/11) compared with 85.3% (157/184) with any cortical involvement (p = 0.265). There was no association between diagnosis and operator years of experience, biopsy technique, needle gauge, or number of passes (p > 0.05). Bleeding occurred after biopsy in 7.7% (15/195) of cases, was associated with percentage of hilar involvement (39.3% ± 44.9% vs 19.3% ± 27.8%; p = 0.012), and was more common in purely hilar masses (36.4% [4/11] vs 5.6% [11/195]; p < 0.001). Complications were not associated with any other feature (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous biopsy of renal hilar masses is technically feasible with diagnostic yield similar to that of cortical masses but with postprocedural bleeding more often than what is seen with cortical masses.

The Effect of N-Acetylcysteine on Creatinine Measurement: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is an antioxidant which can regenerate glutathione and is primarily used for acetaminophen overdose. It is also a potential therapy to prevent iatrogenic acute kidney injury or slow the progression of chronic kidney disease. It has been considered in this context by many studies with mixed results. Notably, a biological-mechanism rationale for a protective effect of NAC has never been adequately reported. Among conflicting reports, there appears to be evidence that NAC may artificially lower measured serum creatinine without improving kidney function, potentially by assay interference. Given these mixed results, a systematic review of the literature will be conducted to determine whether there is an effect of NAC on kidney function measured with serum creatinine. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of NAC on kidney function. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTINGS: Prospective studies, with administration of NAC, in the absence of any other change in kidney function (such as contrast administration or surgery). PATIENTS: Adult humans aged 18 years old or more, either healthy volunteers or with chronic kidney disease, were administered with NAC. Populations having little to no kidney function such as in end-stage kidney disease will be excluded. MEASUREMENTS: Serum creatinine and/or cystatin C measurements before and after NAC administration. METHODS: An information specialist will assist in searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases to identify all study types including randomized controlled trials, and prospective cohort studies reporting change in serum creatinine after NAC administration. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts of the studies obtained from the search using predefined inclusion criteria and will then extract data from the full texts of selected studies. The weighted mean difference will be calculated for change in creatinine with NAC, using random-effects analysis. Quality assessment will be done with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. RESULTS: The outcome of interest is kidney function as reported by either change in serum creatinine and/or serum cystatin C measurement for randomized trials or comparing baseline (pre-NAC dose) values and those following the NAC dose. LIMITATIONS: Possible heterogeneity and publication bias and lack of mechanistic data. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review will provide a synthesis of current evidence on the effect of NAC on serum creatinine measurement. These findings will provide clinicians with guidelines and serve as a strong research base for future studies in this field. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This review is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42017055984.

CONTEXTE: La N-acétylcystéine (NAC) est un antioxydant capable de régénérer le glutathion et principalement utilisé pour traiter les cas de surdose d'acétaminophène. La NAC pourrait également s'avérer efficace comme traitement préventif de l'insuffisance rénale aiguë iatrogénique ou pour ralentir la progression de l'insuffisance rénale chronique. Cette substance a fait l'objet de plusieurs études dans ce contexte, mais les résultats demeurent mitigés. Notamment, il reste toujours à rapporter adéquatement une justification de l'effet protecteur de la NAC sur la base d'un mécanisme biologique. Parmi les rapports contradictoires, certaines données montreraient que la NAC abaisse artificiellement les valeurs de créatinine sérique mesurées sans améliorer la fonction rénale, potentiellement par interférence de l'essai. À la lumière de ces résultats divergents, une revue systématique de la littérature sera effectuée pour déterminer si la NAC produit un effet sur la fonction rénale mesurée par la créatinine sérique. OBJECTIF: Mesurer l'effet de l'administration de NAC sur la fonction rénale. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Une revue systématique de la littérature et une méta-analyse. CADRE: Les études prospectives avec administration de NAC sans autres changements dans la fonction rénale; l'administration d'un produit de contraste ou une intervention chirurgicale, par exemple. SUJETS: Des adultes, volontaires sains ou atteints de néphropathie chronique, ayant reçu de la NAC. Seront exclues les populations dont la fonction rénale est faible ou inexistante; notamment, les cas d'insuffisance rénale terminale. MESURES: Des mesures de la créatinine sérique et/ou de la cystatine C faites avant et après l'administration de NAC. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Un documentariste spécialisé assistera les recherches dans les bases de données MEDLINE, EMBASE et Cochrane CENTRAL afin de répertorier tous les types d'essais, y compris les essais contrôlés à répartition aléatoire, et toutes les études de cohorte prospectives faisant état d'une variation de la créatinine sérique à la suite de l'administration de NAC. À l'aide de critères d'inclusion prédéfinis, deux réviseurs seront indépendamment chargés de trier les titres et abrégés des études répertoriées lors de la revue de la littérature. Ils devront ensuite extraire les données des textes des études qui auront été retenues. Une analyse des effets aléatoires sera utilisée pour calculer la moyenne pondérée des écarts pour les variations observées dans les mesures de créatinine en présence de NAC. La qualité des essais aléatoires sera évaluée à l'aide de l'outil Cochrane sur le risque de biais, et celle des études observationnelles sera mesurée avec l'échelle de Newcastle-Ottawa. RÉSULTATS: Le principal résultat d'intérêt est la fonction rénale telle que rapportée soit par un changement dans les mesures de créatinine sérique et/ou de la cystatine C dans les essais à répartition aléatoire, soit en comparant les valeurs mesurées avant et après l'administration d'une dose de NAC. LIMITES: L'hétérogénéité des données, de possibles biais de publication et un manque de données mécanistiques. CONCLUSION: Cette revue systématique offrira une synthèse des données probantes actuelles sur l'effet de la NAC sur les mesures de créatinine sérique. Ces résultats fourniront des lignes directrices aux cliniciens et serviront de bases solides pour les recherches futures dans ce domaine.

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Review and Clinical Practice Guideline Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) in renal impairment is controversial, with physician and patient apprehension in acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dialysis because of concerns regarding nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). The position that GBCA are absolutely contraindicated in AKI, category G4 and G5 CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), and dialysis-dependent patients is outdated and may limit access to clinically necessary contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. This review and clinical practice guideline addresses the discrepancy between existing Canadian guidelines regarding use of GBCA in renal impairment and NSF. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Published literature (including clinical trials, retrospective cohort series, review articles, and case reports), online registries, and direct manufacturer databases were searched for reported cases of NSF by class and specific GBCA and exposed patient population. METHODS: A comprehensive review was conducted identifying cases of NSF and their association to class of GBCA, specific GBCA used, patient, and dose (when this information was available). Based on the available literature, consensus guidelines were developed by an expert panel of radiologists and nephrologists. KEY FINDINGS: In patients with category G2 or G3 CKD (eGFR ≥ 30 and < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), administration of standard doses of GBCA is safe and no additional precautions are necessary. In patients with AKI, with category G4 or G5 CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) or on dialysis, administration of GBCA should be considered individually and alternative imaging modalities utilized whenever possible. If GBCA are necessary, newer GBCA may be administered with patient consent obtained by a physician (or their delegate) citing an exceedingly low risk (much less than 1%) of developing NSF. Standard GBCA dosing should be used; half or quarter dosing is not recommended and repeat injections should be avoided. Dialysis-dependent patients should receive dialysis; however, initiating dialysis or switching from peritoneal to hemodialysis to reduce the risk of NSF is unproven. Use of a macrocyclic ionic instead of macrocyclic nonionic GBCA or macrocyclic instead of newer linear GBCA to further prevent NSF is unproven. Gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoversetamide remain absolutely contraindicated in patients with AKI, those with category G4 or G5 CKD, or those on dialysis. The panel agreed that screening for renal disease is important but less critical when using macrocyclic and newer linear GBCA. Monitoring for and reporting of potential cases of NSF in patients with AKI or CKD who have received GBCA is recommended. LIMITATIONS: Limited available literature (number of injections and use in renal impairment) regarding the use of gadoxetate disodium. Limited, but growing and generally high-quality, number of clinical trials evaluating GBCA administration in renal impairment. Limited data regarding the topic of Gadolinium deposition in the brain, particularly as it related to patients with renal impairment. IMPLICATIONS: In patients with AKI and category G4 and G5 CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and in dialysis-dependent patients who require GBCA-enhanced MRI, GBCA can be administered with exceedingly low risk of causing NSF when using macrocyclic agents and newer linear agents at routine doses.

OBJECTIF DE LA REVUE: L'utilisation d'agents de contraste à base de gadolinium (ACBG) est controversée dans les cas d'insuffisance rénale. En effet, en raison de préoccupations concernant la fibrose systémique néphrogénique (FSN), elle suscite l'appréhension des médecins et des patients dans les cas d'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA), d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) et chez les patients dépendants de la dialyse. La perception selon laquelle les ACBG seraient formellement contre-indiqués dans les cas d'IRA, d'IRC de stade G4 et G5 (débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé [DFGe] < 30 ml/min/1,73 m2) et de dépendance à la dialyse est obsolète et pourrait limiter l'accès à l'IRM rehaussée par contraste ­ un examen cliniquement nécessaire. La présente revue et les directives cliniques proposées portent sur les incohérences des lignes directrices canadiennes actuelles en regard de l'utilisation des ACBG dans les cas d'insuffisance rénale et de FSN. SOURCES: Nous avons répertorié les cas déclarés de FSN selon l'ACBG utilisé (et sa classe) et selon les populations exposées, dans les articles publiés (essais cliniques, études de cohorte rétrospectives et rapports de cas), les registres en ligne et les bases de données des fabricants. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons procédé à un examen approfondi des sources pour répertorier les cas de FSN et leur association à une classe d'ACBG, à un ACBG en particulier, à la situation du patient et à la dose administrée (lorsque l'information était disponible). Un comité d'experts (néphrologues et radiologues) a émis de nouvelles lignes directrices consensuelles conformes aux résultats obtenus. PRINCIPAUX RÉSULTATS: Chez les patients atteints d'IRC de stade G2 ou G3 (DFGe ≥ 30 et < 60 ml/min/1,73 m2), l'administration d'ACBG aux doses habituelles est bénigne et aucune précaution n'est nécessaire. Lorsque possible, l'administration d'ACBG devrait faire l'objet d'une évaluation au cas par cas et d'autres modalités d'imagerie devraient être envisagées dans les cas d'IRA, d'IRC de stade G4 ou G5 ou de dépendance à la dialyse. Si le recours aux ACBG est nécessaire, on peut se tourner vers de nouvelles classes d'ACBG à risque excessivement faible (moins de 1 %) d'occasionner une FSN, tant que le médecin (ou son délégué) obtient le consentement du patient. On emploiera les doses d'ACBG habituelles; il n'est pas recommandé d'administrer de doses réduites, et les injections répétées devraient être évitées. Les patients dépendants de la dialyse devraient poursuivre leur traitement. On notera qu'il n'existe aucune preuve que l'initiation d'un traitement de dialyse ou que la transition de la dialyse péritonéale à l'hémodialyse réduise les risques de FSN. Le recours à des ACBG macrocycliques ioniques plutôt que non ioniques, ou à des ACBG macrocycliques plutôt qu'aux plus récents ACBG linéaires, n'a pas été démontré plus efficace pour prévenir la FSN. Par ailleurs, le gadopentétate de diméglumine, le gadodiamide et le gadoversétamide demeurent formellement contre-indiqués dans les cas d'IRA, d'IRC de stade G4 ou G5, et de dépendance à la dialyse. Le comité d'experts a convenu que le dépistage de l'insuffisance rénale, quoiqu'important, s'avère secondaire lors de l'administration des plus récents ACBG linéaires ou d'ACBG macrocycliques. La déclaration et le suivi des possibles cas de FSN liés à l'utilisation des ACBG chez les patients atteints d'IRA ou d'IRC sont recommandés. LIMITES: Plusieurs facteurs limitent la portée de nos résultats : i) la quantité limitée d'articles portant sur l'utilisation du gadoxétate disodique (notamment sur le nombre d'injections et son utilisation dans les cas d'insuffisance rénale); ii) le nombre limité (quoique croissant et généralement de grande qualité) d'essais cliniques évaluant l'administration des ACBG en contexte d'insuffisance rénale et; iii) la quantité limitée de données concernant l'accumulation du gadolinium dans le cerveau, particulièrement chez les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale. CONCLUSION: Lorsque des examens d'IRM rehaussés par contraste sont nécessaires, les plus récents ACBG linéaires et les ACBG macrocycliques peuvent être administrés aux doses habituelles avec un risque excessivement faible de causer une FSN chez les patients atteints d'IRA, d'IRC de stade G4 et G5 (DFGe < 30 ml/min/1,73 m2), de même que chez les patients dépendants de la dialyse.

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease: Comprehensive Review and Clinical Practice Guideline Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists.

Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in renal impairment is controversial, with physician and patient apprehension in acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dialysis because of concerns regarding nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). The position that GBCAs are absolutely contraindicated in AKI, CKD stage 4 or 5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and dialysis-dependent patients is outdated, and may limit access to clinically necessary contrast-enhanced MRI examinations. Following a comprehensive review of the literature and reported NSF cases to date, a committee of radiologists and nephrologists developed clinical practice guidelines to assist physicians in making decisions regarding GBCA administrations. In patients with mild-to-moderate CKD (eGFR ≥30 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), administration of standard doses of GBCA is safe and no additional precautions are necessary. In patients with AKI, with severe CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2), or on dialysis, administration of GBCAs should be considered individually and alternative imaging modalities utilized whenever possible. If GBCAs are necessary, newer GBCAs may be administered with patient consent obtained by a physician (or their delegate), citing an exceedingly low risk (much less than 1%) of developing NSF. Standard GBCA dosing should be used; half or quarter dosing is not recommended and repeat injections should be avoided. Dialysis-dependent patients should receive dialysis; however, initiating dialysis or switching from peritoneal to hemodialysis to reduce the risk of NSF is unproven. Use of a macrocyclic ionic instead of macrocyclic nonionic GBCA or macrocyclic instead of newer linear GBCA to further prevent NSF is unproven. Gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoversetamide remain absolutely contraindicated in patients with AKI, with stage 4 or 5 CKD, or on dialysis. The panel agreed that screening for renal disease is important but less critical when using macrocyclic and newer linear GBCAs. Monitoring for and reporting of potential cases of NSF in patients with AKI or CKD who have received GBCAs is recommended.

Drug discontinuation before contrast procedures and the effect on acute kidney injury and other clinical outcomes: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is defined as worsening of renal function after the administration of iodinated contrast material. In patients with cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, and/or diabetes, renin-angiotensin system blockers, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, diuretics, and metformin can increase the risk of CI-AKI when undergoing contrast imaging. Despite CI-AKI being the leading iatrogenic cause of acute kidney injury, there is a lack of sufficient scientific evidence supporting which drugs should be stopped, when they should be stopped, and when they should be resumed. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess (1) the effect of withholding medication before contrast procedures on the risk of CI-AKI and other clinical outcomes and (2) the incidence of adverse events occurring after withholding these drugs prior to contrast procedures. This protocol has been registered with PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42016033178 . METHODS: An information specialist will assist in searching MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases to identify randomized controlled trials, observational studies, case reports, and case series. Relevant abstracts from professional society meetings and web-based registries of clinical trials will also be included. Studies included will compare patients aged ≥ 18 years instructed to continue taking the drugs of interest and those advised to stop taking them before undergoing contrast procedures. If these drugs are not withheld prior to contrast procedures, the studies must compare patients who are administered these drugs and those who are not before undergoing contrast procedures. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts of the studies obtained from the search using pre-defined inclusion criteria and will then extract data from the full texts of selected studies. The quality of the studies will be assessed by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide a synthesis of current evidence on the discontinuation of drugs prior to contrast procedures and its effect on CI-AKI and other clinical outcomes. These findings will provide clinicians with guidelines and serve as a strong research base for future studies in this field. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016033178.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Qualitative and Quantitative Computed Tomography Analysis for Diagnosis of Pathological Grade and Stage in Upper Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare grade and stage of upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) using computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With institutional review board approval, 48 patients with 49 UCC (44 high grade and 5 low grade, 26 ≤ T1 and 23 ≥ T2) underwent nephroureterectomy and preoperative computed tomography between 2013 and 2015. Two blinded radiologists assessed for tumor appearance (filling defect/mass or wall thickening/stricture), margin (smooth or spiculated/irregular), texture (homogeneous, heterogeneous), hydronephrosis, and calcification. A third blinded radiologist established consensus. A fourth blinded radiologist measured size and first-order histogram texture features. Comparisons were performed using χ test, multivariable logistic regression, and receiver operator characteristic analysis. RESULTS: There was no difference in size of tumors compared by grade or stage (P = 0.80 and 0.13, respectively).Among subjective variables, only tumor texture was significantly different between low- and high-grade UCC (P = 0.03; κ = 0.45). Tumors characterized as spiculated/irregular margin (P = 0.003; 0.30) and heterogeneous (P < 0.001; κ = 0.45) were associated with T2 disease or higher.Entropy was greater in higher grade (6.23 ± 0.46 vs 5.72 ± 0.28) and T2 disease or higher (6.40 ± 0.33 vs 5.95 ± 0.48), (P = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively) with no differences in Kurtosis or Skewness (P > 0.05). Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for entropy to diagnose high-grade and T2 tumors or higher was 0.83 (confidence interval, 0.64-1.0) and 0.79 (confidence interval 0.59-0.98), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity, assessed qualitatively and quantitatively, is accurate for diagnosis of higher grade and stage of disease in upper tract UCC. Spiculated/irregular margins are also associated with T2 disease or higher.

Evaluation of MRI for diagnosis of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose extraprostatic extension (EPE) in prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, 149 men with 170 ≥0.5 mL tumors underwent preoperative 3T MRI followed by radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2012-2015. Two blinded radiologists (R1/R2) assessed tumors using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2, subjectively evaluated for the presence of EPE, measured tumor size, and length of capsular contact (LCC). A third blinded radiologist, using MRI-RP-maps, measured whole-lesion: apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mean/centile and histogram features. Comparisons were performed using chi-square, logistic regression, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: The subjective EPE assessment showed high specificity (SPEC = 75.4/91.3% [R1/R2]), low sensitivity (SENS = 43.3/43.6% [R1/R2]), and area-under (AU) ROC curve = 0.67 (confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.73) R1 and 0.61 (CI 0.53-0.70) R2; (k = 0.33). PI-RADS v2 scores were strongly associated with EPE (P < 0.001 / P = 0.008; R1/R2) with AU-ROC curve = 0.72 (0.64-0.79) R1 and 0.61 (0.53-0.70) R2; (k = 0.44). Tumors with EPE were larger (18.8 ± 7.8 [median 17, range 6-51] vs. 18.8 ± 4.9 [12, 6-28] mm) and had greater LCC (21.1 ± 14.9 [16, 1-85] vs. 13.6 ± 6.1 [11.5, 4-30] mm); P < 0.001 and 0.002, respectively. AU-ROC for size was 0.73 (0.64-0.80) and LCC was 0.69 (0.60-0.76), respectively. Optimal SENS/SPEC for diagnosis of EPE were: size ≥15 mm = 67.7/66.7% and LCC ≥11 mm = 84.9/44.8%. 10th -centile ADC and ADC entropy were both associated with EPE (P = 0.02 and < 0.001), with AU-ROC = 0.56 (0.47-0.65) and 0.76 (0.69-0.83), respectively. Optimal SENS/SPEC for diagnosis of EPE with entropy ≥6.99 was 63.3/75.0%. 25th -centile ADC trended towards being significantly lower with EPE (P = 0.06) with no difference in other ADC metrics (P = 0.25-0.88). Size, LCC, and ADC entropy improved sensitivity but reduced specificity compared with subjective analysis with no difference in overall accuracy (P = 0.38). CONCLUSION: Measurements of tumor size, capsular contact, and ADC entropy improve sensitivity but reduce specificity for diagnosis of EPE compared to subjective assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:176-185.

Is Ultrasound Useful for Further Evaluation of Homogeneously Hyperattenuating Renal Lesions Detected on CT?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of ultrasound (US) to characterize hyperattenuating cysts detected as indeterminate hyperattenuating renal lesions on unenhanced and single phase enhanced CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 consecutive homogeneously hyperattenuating renal lesions underwent gray-scale and Doppler US at our institution between 2010 and 2013. Two radiologists who were unaware of the final diagnosis retrospectively evaluated US images for visibility and diagnosis (simple cyst, intermediate complexity cyst, cystic or solid mass showing internal flow on Doppler US, or indeterminate). A third radiologist assessed lesion size, location, and distance to skin on CT and US. US visibility was compared using chi-square and independent t tests. Consensus US interpretation was compared with reference standard diagnoses, and accuracy for diagnosis of hyperattenuating cysts was tabulated. RESULTS: Mean lesion size ± SD was 20 ± 16 mm (range, 6-96 mm) and mean distance to skin on CT was 62 ± 25 mm (range, 18-125 mm). In all, 89.7% (96/107) of the lesions were visible on US, including all lesions that were 15 mm or larger. Nonvisible lesions were smaller than visible ones (10.0 ± 3.6 mm vs 20.7 ± 16.3 mm, p = 0.03) regardless of location (p > 0.05). CT overestimated lesion distance to skin compared with US (46.6 ± 18.6 mm, p < 0.001). Final diagnoses for US visible lesions (n = 96) were hyperattenuating cyst (n = 66), Bosniak IIF cyst (n = 13), and cystic or solid neoplasm (n = 15); two patients were lost to follow-up. Of the 66 hyperattenuating cysts, 54 (81.8%) appeared as simple cysts on US with sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of hyperattenuating cyst of 81.8% (95% CI, 75.6-84.3%) and 92.9% (95% CI, 78.1-98.7%), respectively. The other 12 (18.2%) hyperattenuating cysts appeared complex. Two of the 13 Bosniak IIF lesions were incorrectly classified as simple cysts with US. Including the 11 (10%) nonvisible lesions reduced sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of hyperattenuating cyst to 73.0% (95% CI, 66.9-75.9%) and 89.7% (95% CI, 74.2-97.2%), respectively. CONCLUSION: US can further characterize hyperattenuating cysts presenting as indeterminate hyperattenuating renal lesions on CT in the majority of cases.

Can CT and MR Shape and Textural Features Differentiate Benign Versus Malignant Pleural Lesions?

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to identify a radiomic approach based on CT and or magnetic resonance (MR) features (shape and texture) that may help differentiate benign versus malignant pleural lesions, and to assess if the radiomic model may improve confidence and accuracy of radiologists with different subspecialty backgrounds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with pleural lesions studied on both contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging were reviewed retrospectively. Three texture and three shape features were extracted. Combinations of features were used to generate logistic regression models using histopathology as outcome. Two thoracic and two abdominal radiologists evaluated their degree of confidence in malignancy. Diagnostic accuracy of radiologists was determined using contingency tables. Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to assess inter-reader agreement. Using optimal threshold criteria, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each feature and combination of features were obtained and compared to the accuracy and confidence of radiologists. RESULTS: The CT model that best discriminated malignant from benign lesions revealed an AUCCT = 0.92 ± 0.05 (P < 0.0001). The most discriminative MR model showed an AUCMR = 0.87 ± 0.09 (P < 0.0001). The CT model was compared to the diagnostic confidence of all radiologists and the model outperformed both abdominal radiologists (P < 0.002), whereas the top discriminative MR model outperformed one of the abdominal radiologists (P = 0.02). The most discriminative MR model was more accurate than one abdominal (P = 0.04) and one thoracic radiologist (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Quantitative textural and shape analysis may help distinguish malignant from benign lesions. A radiomics-based approach may increase diagnostic confidence of abdominal radiologists on CT and MR and may potentially improve radiologists' accuracy in the assessment of pleural lesions characterized by MR.

Prognostic value of Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System (PI-RADS) v. 2 assessment categories 4 and 5 compared to histopathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To assess Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System (PI-RADS) v. 2 score 4/5 lesions compared to Gleason score (GS) and stage after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to validate the proposed 15-mm size threshold that differentiates category 4 versus 5 lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, 140 men underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and RP between 2012-2015. Two blinded radiologists: 1) assigned PI-RADS v. 2 scores, 2) measured tumor size on axial T2 -weighted-MRI, and 3) assessed for extraprostatic extension (EPE). Interobserver agreement was calculated and consensus diagnoses achieved through reference standard (MRI-RP maps). PI-RADS v. 2 scores and tumor size were compared to GS and stage using chi-square, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: In all, 80.7% (113/140) of tumors were category 4 (n = 45) or 5 (n = 68) lesions (κ = 0.45). Overall tumor size was 18.2 ± 7.7 mm and category 5 lesions were larger (22.6 ± 6.8 versus 11.5 ± 1.9 mm, P < 0.001). High-risk (GS ≥8) tumors were larger than low- and intermediate-risk tumors (P = 0.016) and were more frequently, but not significantly so, category 5 lesions (78.9% [15/19] vs. 22.1% [4/10], P = 0.18). 67.3% (76/113) of patients had EPE. Category 5 lesions were strongly associated with EPE (P < 0.0001). Area under the ROC curve for diagnosis of EPE by size was 0.74 (confidence interval 0.64-0.83), with size ≥15 mm yielding a sensitivity/specificity of 72.4/64.9%. Size improved sensitivity for diagnosis of EPE compared to subjective assessment (sensitivity/specificity ranging from 46.1-48.7%/70.3-86.5%, κ = 0.29) (P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: PI-RADS v. 2 category 5 lesions are associated with higher Gleason scores and EPE. A 15-mm size threshold is reasonably accurate for diagnosis of EPE with increased sensitivity compared to subjective assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:257-266.

Prostate volume estimations using magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound compared to radical prostatectomy specimens.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the accuracy of prostate volume estimates in patients who received both a preoperative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in relation to the referent pathological specimen post-radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Patients receiving both TRUS and MRI prior to radical prostatectomy at one academic institution were retrospectively analyzed. TRUS and MRI volumes were estimated using the prolate ellipsoid formula. TRUS volumes were collected from sonography reports. MRI volumes were estimated by two blinded raters and the mean of the two was used for analyses. Pathological volume was calculated using a standard fluid displacement method. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighteen (318) patients were included in the analysis. MRI was slightly more accurate than TRUS based on interclass correlation (0.83 vs. 0.74) and absolute risk bias (higher proportion of estimates within 5, 10, and 20 cc of pathological volume). For TRUS, 87 of 298 (29.2%) prostates without median lobes differed by >10 cc of specimen volume and 22 of 298 (7.4%) differed by >20 cc. For MRI, 68 of 298 (22.8%) prostates without median lobes differed by >10 cc of specimen volume, while only 4 of 298 (1.3%) differed by >20 cc. CONCLUSIONS: MRI and TRUS prostate volume estimates are consistent with pathological volumes along the prostate size spectrum. MRI demonstrated better correlation with prostatectomy specimen volume in most patients and may be better suited in cases where TRUS and MRI estimates are disparate. Validation of these findings with prospective, standardized ultrasound techniques would be helpful.

Comparison of high-resolution T1W 3D GRE (LAVA) with 2-point Dixon fat/water separation (FLEX) to T1W fast spin echo (FSE) in prostate cancer (PCa).

PURPOSE: To compare T1-weighted (T1W) fast spin echo (FSE) to T1W 3-dimensional gradient recalled echo (LAVA) with fat water separation (FLEX) in prostate cancer (PCa). METHODOLOGY: With institutional review board waiver, 39 patients underwent 3-T magnetic resonance imaging including T1W LAVA FLEX (157s)/T1W FSE (316s). Two radiologists assessed (a) image quality/sharpness, (b) presence/severity of artifacts, and (c) skeletal (N=22)/nodal (N=9) metastases. Results were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test/receiver operator characteristic analysis. RESULTS: With T1W LAVA FLEX, image quality/sharpness improved (P<.001) with less motion (P=.002-.03) and no difference in phase-encoding artifact (P>.05). One patient had moderate fat/water swap. Detection of skeletal metastases was unchanged (P>.05) and nodal metastases either improved (P=.002) or were comparable (P=.16) using T1W LAVA FLEX. CONCLUSION: T1W LAVA FLEX improves image quality, lessens motion artifact, and is comparable or improves detection of metastases in PCa with reduction in acquisition time.

Comparison of Quantitative MRI and CT Washout Analysis for Differentiation of Adrenal Pheochromocytoma From Adrenal Adenoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use quantitative analysis to assess MRI and washout CT in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma versus adenoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four pheochromocytomas (washout CT, 5; MRI, 24; both MRI and CT, 5) resected between 2003 and 2014 were compared with 39 consecutive adenomas (washout CT, 9; MRI, 29; both MRI and CT, 1). A blinded radiologist measured unenhanced attenuation, 70-second peak CT enhancement, 15-minute relative and absolute percentage CT washout, chemical-shift signal intensity index, adrenal-to-spleen signal intensity ratio, T2-weighted signal intensity ratio, and AUC of the contrast-enhanced MRI curve. Comparisons between groups were performed with multivariate and ROC analyses. RESULTS: There was no difference in age or sex between the groups (p > 0.05). For CT, pheochromocytomas were larger (4.2 ± 2.5 [SD] vs 2.3 ± 0.9 mm; p = 0.02) and had higher unenhanced attenuation (35.7 ± 6.8 HU [range, 24-48 HU] vs 14.0 ± 20.9 HU [range, -19 to 52 HU]; p = 0.002), greater 70-second peak CT enhancement (92.8 ± 31.1 HU [range, 41.0-143.1 HU] vs 82.6 ± 29.9 HU [range, 50.0-139.0 HU ]; p = 0.01), lower relative washout CT (21.7 ± 24.7 [range, -29.3 to 53.7] vs 65.3 ± 22.3 [range, 32.9-115.3]; p = 0.002), and lower absolute washout CT (31.9 ± 42.8 [range, -70.6 to 70.2] vs 76.9 ± 10.3 [range, 60.3-89.6]; p = 0.001). Thirty percent (3/10) of pheochromocytomas had absolute CT washout in the adenoma range (> 60%). For MRI, pheochromocytomas were larger (5.0 ± 4.2 vs 2.0 ± 0.7 mm; p = 0.003) and had a lower chemical-shift signal intensity index and higher adrenal-to-spleen signal intensity ratio (-3.5% ± 14.3% [range, -56.3% to 12.2%] and 1.1% ± 0.1% [range, 0.9-1.3%] vs 47.3% ± 27.8% [range, -9.4% to 86.0%] and 0.51% ± 0.27% [range, 0.13-1.1%]) (p < 0.001) and higher T2-weighted signal intensity ratio (4.4 ± 2.4 vs 1.8 ± 0.8; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in contrast-enhanced MRI AUC (288.9 ± 265.3 vs 276.2 ± 129.9 seconds; p = 0.96). The ROC AUC for T2-weighted signal intensity ratio was 0.91 with values greater than 3.8 diagnostic of pheochromocytoma. CONCLUSION: In this study, the presence of intracellular lipid on unenhanced CT or chemical-shift MR images was diagnostic of adrenal adenoma. Elevated T2-weighted signal intensity ratio was specific for pheochromocytoma but lacked sensitivity. There was overlap in all other MRI and CT washout parameters.

Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and MR volumetry as independent associative factors for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in prostatic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To assess mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and MR-derived tumor volume (Vt) as associative factors for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: With institutional review board approval, 73 consecutive patients diagnosed with PCa at trans-rectal ultrasound biopsy underwent preoperative multi-parametric (T2W+DWI+DCE) 3 Tesla MRI before radical prostatectomy between 2012 and 2014; 52% (38/73) patients had EPE. Clinical parameters including: age, prostate serum antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE) and percentage positive cores (PPC) were recorded. Two blinded radiologists subjectively evaluated for EPE using PI-RADS with T2W-MRI. A third blinded radiologist recorded: mean ADC (mm(2) /s) of tumor and tumor volume on ADC and T2W (derived from planar volumetry). VtMAX (the largest volume on ADC or T2W) was documented. Multivariate and receiver operator characteristic analyses were performed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, DRE, or Gleason score between groups (P = 0.52, 0.06, 0.61, 0.36). PSA approached significance being higher with EPE (12.9 ± 12.6 versus 8.2 ± 7.4; P = 0.06). PPC was higher with EPE (60.9 ± 21.9% versus 38.3 ± 21.6%; P < 0.01) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78 and sensitivity/specificity = 75.7/75% when PPC ≥ 45%. AUC for T2W-MRI was 0.46-0.51 with sensitivity/specificity = 40.0-42.9/48.6-57.1% (R1, R2). Inter-observer agreement was fair, k = 0.39. There was no difference in mean ADC between groups (0.89 ± 0.25 versus 0.88 ± 0.19 [EPE] mm(2) /s), P = 0.70. T2W-Vt, ADC-Vt, and VtMAX were larger with EPE (5.1 ± 7.4, 5.8 ± 6.5, 6.3 ± 7.4 cm(3) versus 1.6 ± 1.8, 1.8 ± 1.3, 2.1 ± 1.8), P < 0.01. VtMAX AUC was 0.77 with sensitivity/specificity = 78.4/73.5% when VtMAX ≥ 2.1 cm(3) which outperformed all other parameters (P > 0.05) except PPC (P = 0.6) for the diagnosis EPE. CONCLUSION: MR volumetry and percentage of positive core biopsies are associated with EPE; whereas, in this study, other clinical and MR parameters including mean ADC and subjective T2W-MR analysis were not useful for assessment of EPE.