Treatment of aggressive fibromatosis: the experience of a single institution.

AIMS: Aggressive fibromatosis is a locally aggressive infiltrative low-grade tumour, although pathologically benign, and it does not metastasise, yet it can cause serious local distressing symptoms by virtue of local destruction and impairment of local function. The aim of this study was to emphasise the role of radiotherapy and adequate surgery in the treatment of fibromatosis in patients presenting with newly diagnosed or recurrent disease and to analyse our treatment results over 15 years for this rare tumour type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with confirmed diagnosis of aggressive fibromatosis treated at King Faisal Specialist Hospital between 1990 and 2006 were identified from our local cancer registry. Forty-seven patients had surgery: complete resection (R0) in 20 patients, incomplete surgery (R1/2) in 27 patients, and seven patients had biopsy only. Forty-five patients were treated with radiotherapy: 38 patients were treated with postoperative radiotherapy, three patients were treated with preoperative radiotherapy and four patients had radiotherapy as the only treatment. The radiotherapy dose ranged between 45 and 60Gy (median 50.4Gy). Three patients did not receive any form of treatment apart from biopsy, but were still included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-two per cent (28/54 patients) of our patient population had tumour recurrence when first presented to King Faisal Specialist Hospital. The median age was 29.5 years (range 2-63 years). The most common site of involvement was the extremities (28 patients). Among the 54 patients (with primary and recurrent presentation) there were 10 local recurrences, all of which were within the original primary site. The 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates for the whole group were 75 and 95%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the depth of invasion significantly affected progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: Aggressive fibromatosis is effectively treated with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. Patients first presenting with tumour recurrence may still have local tumour control comparable with newly diagnosed patients.

Phase II study of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and cisplatin for operable and locally advanced breast cancer: analysis of 126 patients.

In an earlier study, we have demonstrated a high clinical and pathologic response rate of neoadjuvant paclitaxel (P) and cisplatin (C) for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). The current phase II study includes larger number of patients who had longer follow-up. A total of 126 consecutive patients with noninflammatory LABC (T2 >4 cm, T3 or T4, N0-N3, M0) were included in the study. Patients were scheduled to receive three to four cycles of the neoadjuvant PC (paclitaxel 135 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2) on day 1) every 21 days. Patients were then subjected to surgery and subsequently received six cycles of FAC (5-fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2), doxorubicin 50 mg m(-2), and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m(-2)) or four cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60 mg m(-2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2)); all drugs were administered intravenously on day 1 with cycles repeated every 21 days. Patients then received radiation therapy, and those with hormone receptor-positive tumours were given adjuvant tamoxifen intended for 5 years. The median age was 41 years. Clinically, 12, 52, and 37% of patients had T2 >4 cm, T3, and T4, respectively. The mean tumour size was 7 cm (95% CI, 7.3-8.5). The clinical nodal status was N0, N1, and N2-N3 in 32, 52, and 17% of patients, respectively. Disease stage at diagnosis was IIA (2%), IIB (32%), IIIA (28%), and IIIB (39%). Clinical assessment of the primary tumour and the axillary nodal status after primary chemotherapy showed that 35 patients (28%) achieved complete response (cCR), while 80 (63%) demonstrated partial response to PC. Of patients with evaluable pathologic data of the primary tumour (123 patients), complete pathologic response (pCR) was achieved in 29 patients (24%), and an additional nine (7%) only had a microinvasive disease. Moreover, 20 of the 122 patients (16%) had no residual disease in the primary tumour or in the axillary nodes. Failure to attain cCR predicted failure to achieve pCR. At a median follow-up of 37.5 months (95% CI, 31.5-43.3), 71% were alive with no recurrence, 16% were alive with evidence of disease, and 13% were dead. Of the 122 patients who had surgery, 36 (29%) developed recurrence including one of the patients who attained pCR. The median overall or disease-free survival has not been reached with a projected 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of 85% (+/-4%) and 63% (+/-5%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, clinical response of the primary tumour, pathological response of the primary tumour, and the pathological nodal status were identified as independent prognostic variables for DFS. No variable, however, was identified to prognosticate OS. PC was acceptably safe. Neoadjuvant PC as used in this phase II study in a multidisciplinary strategy was highly effective. Clinical and pathologic responses remain the most important variables that predict outcome.

Metastatic Ewing sarcoma/PNET of bone at diagnosis: prognostic factors--a report from Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate outcome and prognostic factors in Saudi Arabian patients with metastatic Ewing sarcoma and PNET of bone (PMES) at diagnosis. PROCEDURE: Ninety-nine of 304 (33%) consecutive patients with Ewing sarcoma and PNET of bone registered at our centre from 1975 to 1998, had metastatic disease at registration and 93 were available for analysis. The maximum x-axis diameter of the primary tumor was used as the measure of primary tumor size. Usually a trial of systemic treatment was undertaken before a decision was made on local treatment. Standard chemotherapy regimens were used in all treated patients. Forty-one (44%) patients did not receive radical local treatment due to an inadequate response to chemotherapy, or a decision not to undertake more than palliative treatment. Radical treatment of the primary site was radiation alone 41 (79%), resection alone 7 (13%), and resection and radiation 4 (8%). RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates were 9% for all 93 evaluable patients, 16% for 52 patients who received chemotherapy and radical local treatment, 0% for 41 patients who received lesser treatment, 19% for 43 patients with lung metastases alone, and 0% (P = 0.002) for 50 patients with other sites involved. For 60 patients with imaging data, 5-year survivals were 34 and 0% when the maximum transverse diameter of the primary tumor was < 10 cm (N = 20) and > or = 10 cm (N = 40), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Small primary tumor size and the presence of lung metastases alone were the only significant favorable prognostic factors. Earlier diagnosis will be the basis for better results.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of repeated sedations for the radiotherapy of young children with cancer: a prospective study of 1033 consecutive sedations.

PURPOSE: A prospective observational study to examine our current practice of either conscious sedation (C.S.) or general anesthetic (G.A.) for children undergoing radiation therapy (we use the term sedation to include both C.S. and G.A.). Specifically, the study examines the reasons for selection of patients, choice of drugs, safety and effectiveness of the procedure, side effects of repeated daily sedation, and compliance of the family with the regimen. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Recorded data included patient demographics, sedation technique, time for various stages of the procedure, breathing support required, sedation outcome, and complications. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-eight consecutive children underwent 4232 procedures involving either simulation or radiation treatment, an average of 21 procedures each. Seventy-four (37%) required sedation for a total of 1033 procedures, an average of 14 sedations each. For those patients who received sedation, the age ranged from 9 months to 14 years (median, 3.8) and 96% had a mold, (85% of the head and neck). The doctor's assessment of the need for sedation was correct 89% of the time. Thirty-seven percent required sedation at the start of treatment, but, even after 30 fractions, 15% still required sedation. Presedation status correlated with successful sedation and treatment (p = 0.0001). Ninety-six percent had some form of i.v. access, usually a portacath (76%); 883 sedations were performed with G.A. and 148 with C.S.; 93% of sedations were completed satisfactorily, 5% with some difficulty, and the patient was unable to be treated in 2%. With G.A., satisfactory sedation was achieved 97% of the time, whereas, with C.S., satisfactory sedation was achieved only 68% of the time. There were no complications for 97% of observations. Not one serious complication occurred. An endotracheal tube was used only twice during G.A. For C.S., the results for chloral hydrate, meperidine, and midazolam were, respectively, at least one complication, 23%, 0%, 5%; satisfactory sedation for treatment, 60%, 60%, 82%; and unable to treat 20%, 13%, 5%. For G.A., only 1 patient was unable to be treated. The median time from start of medication to the end of radiation treatment was a median of 10 min (75% complete within 15 min) for G.A., vs. 30 min (75% complete in 50 min) for C.S. On multivariate analysis, the only significant factor predicting a successful outcome was a G.A. using propofol (odds ratio, 20.6), vs. C.S. using either chloral hydrate, meperidine, or midazolam. (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this study, there were no serious complications of sedation in 1033 procedures. As a result of the study, we developed improved methods for better preparation of the patient and family to try to reduce the need for sedation, and reduce the indications for C.S., while confirming the safety and efficacy of a G.A. with propofol for children needing sedation for daily radiation therapy.

Prognostic factors for medulloblastoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate prognostic factors for medulloblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and seventy-three consecutive patients with medulloblastoma, treated at King Faisal Specialist Hospital (KFSH) from 1988-1997, were reviewed. Eighty-four percent were children less than 15 years old. From 1988-1994, treatment was at the discretion of the investigator. From 1994-1998, patients entered a single-arm best practice protocol in which, in staged patients, the surgical intent was total resection, standard radiation treatment was defined, and adjuvant chemotherapy was given to a "high-risk" subset. RESULTS: For 150 patients who completed surgical and radiation treatment, the 5-year survival rate was 58%, compared with 0% for 16 patients who were unable to start or complete radiation treatment. For staged patients, the 5-year survival was M0 + M1, 78% and M2 + M3, 21% (p < 0.0001). Other favorable significant prognostic factors were age >14 years and gross cystic/necrotic features in the primary tumor. The size of the primary tumor, the degree of hydrocephalus at diagnosis, the presence of residual tumor in the post-operative CT/MRI, and the functional status of the patient prior to radiation treatment were not significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: Stage M0 + M1 was the most powerful favorable prognostic factor. In Saudi Arabia more patients present with advanced disseminated disease, 41% M2 + M3, than in the West, and this impacts adversely on overall survival. Total resection and standard radiation treatment were not sensitive prognostic factors in a treatment environment in which 78% of patients underwent at least 90% tumor resection and 60% received standard radiation treatment. In order to improve the proportion of patients able to complete radiation treatment, consideration should be given to limiting resection when the attainment of total resection is likely to be morbid, and to delaying rather than omitting radiation treatment in the patient severely compromised postoperatively.

Extramedullary myeloid tumors in children: the limited value of local treatment.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of extramedullary tumors (EMT) in Saudi Arabian children with acute myeloid leukemia, the factors associated with these tumors and the impact of local treatment on local tumor control, complete remission and survival rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred children, median age 6 years, who received their primary treatment for acute myeloid leukemia at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, from 1983 to 1997 were studied. EMT at diagnosis occurred in 18 (18%) patients at 25 sites. Meningeal leukemia, hepatosplenomegaly, lymph node enlargement, gingival hypertrophy, and cutaneous infiltration were not included in the definition of EMT. With these exclusions, children with EMT were younger than those without EMT (median age, 3.5 v. 7.5 years) and were more likely to have meningeal leukemia at diagnosis (33% v. 10%). The t(8;21) translocation was associated with a 47% EMT incidence compared with 23% without the translocation. Local radiation treatment was given to 16 of 25 (64%) EMT sites. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate for all patients was 28%, and this was not significantly influenced by the drug regimen used, meningeal leukemia at diagnosis, the presence of the (8;21) translocation, M4 and M5 morphology combined, or EMT at diagnosis. Significant differences were observed in the 5-year survival rates for patients who underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (52%; N = 37) and those who attained complete remission (CR) but did not undergo transplantation (21%; N = 44) and those who did not achieve complete remission with initial therapy (5%; N = 19). Systemic and local EMT CR was achieved in 17 of 18 patients with EMT, including 12 patients who underwent radiation treatment and 5 of 6 of those who did not. Isolated relapse was not seen at an EMT site and was not noted at any later stage of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent local control at sites of EMT was achieved in all patients who attained a bone marrow CR, whether or not the site was irradiated. Local radiation treatment of an EMT site did not appear to contribute to overall CR and survival rates. The use of radiation treatment should be conservative and limited to patients in whom there is a real and immediate threat to vision or renal function or when the spinal cord is compromised.

Craniopharyngioma in children.

PURPOSE: The treatment regimens at presentation and recurrence, the related morbidity, and survival rates were studied for children with craniopharyngioma who were treated at King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center (KFSH&RC). METHODS & MATERIALS: From 1975 to 1996, a total of 56 children younger than 18-years-old at diagnosis underwent treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy for craniopharyngiomas at KFSH&RC. There was evidence that these patients had advanced disease at diagnosis; 36% of 51 patients whose visual status pretreatment was known were either blind or had major bilateral visual defects prior to treatment, and 36% of the 56 patients had diabetes insipidus. This report concentrates on 44 patients who had first definitive resection at KFSH&RC. Treatment policy was total resection if possible (17 patients), if not, subtotal resection (17 patients) or lesser procedures (10 patients). Five patients received postoperative irradiation after first definitive resection. RESULTS: Ten-year-survival, and progression-free and event-free survival rates were 65%, 39%, and 29%, respectively. There were 9 postoperative deaths; 7 following the first procedure and 2 following resection for relapse, and 3 early deaths at home prior to relapse, following the first resection. None of the 22 patients who underwent less than total resection without postoperative radiation treatment were progression-free at 5 years, whereas the 5 patients who were irradiated remain progression-free. CONCLUSION: A more selective approach to total resection, and the routine use of postoperative irradiation following lesser surgical procedures requires evaluation.

Health in the central and eastern countries of the WHO European Region: an overview.

The enormous social, political and economic changes that began in the CCEE/NIS in the late 1980s included the revelation and public discussion of a widening health gap between these countries and the other Member States of the European Region. The continuing economic problems and their effects on health increase the urgency of the need for assistance from the international community. Diverging trends in life expectancy became evident in the mid-1970s, and the gap continued to widen in the 1980s for all major causes of death, particularly cardiovascular diseases. The situation is worse in the NIS than in the CCEE, and worst in the central Asian countries. In 1990, the worst infant mortality rate in these countries was eight times the best rate elsewhere in the Region. Non-mortality data, while patchy, confirm the indications given by mortality data. There is no single reason for the health gap, but contributory factors include the increasing prevalence of major risk factors in lifestyles and the environment, and the low efficiency and effectiveness of health care systems. The current situation and short-term prospects are mixed, but the negative trends in mortality and morbidity patterns are likely to continue for some time. While the worst health problems of the transition period in the CCEE/NIS could largely have been avoided, there is no doubt that economizing on health today will exact large costs tomorrow.

PIP: The socioeconomic conditions in eastern European countries are declining. Deterioration began during the mid-1960s. The mortality gap has continued to widen during the 1980s. The Central Asian Republics show mortality patterns similar to ones in developing countries; infant mortality is about 8 times higher than in western Europe. Infant mortality rates in eastern and central Europe are 2-3 times higher than in western Europe. Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death. Another increasing mortality group is lung cancer, and the gap is widening in the West. The NIS (formerly republics of the Soviet Union) have high rates of communicable diseases preventable through immunization. The logistics of vaccine distribution and storage are inadequate. Abortion is the primary means of family planning. 70% of the population of the Russian Federation reported their health as less than good, and only 20% of Russian military personnel are fit based on international standards. Tobacco consumption and high alcohol consumption are the primary health risks. Poor nutrition, stress, and drug abuse add to the risks. The health gap is wide also due to poor housing conditions and environmental pollution. Health care systems, unhealthy lifestyles, and unhealthy environments all contribute to the widening gap in health. The rigid administrative health structures are not conducive to change. The quality of care is low. Decentralization and private sector involvement may produce needed changes in the quality of health services. CCEE countries spend 4.5-7.1% of gross national product on health, compared to 7.3% in the West. In the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, and Slovakia, health expenditures per person are 3-4 times less than in OECD countries. Prices are very high for drugs, food, and energy. Although the medical staff-patient ratio is high, there are shortages in particular specialties. Nurses are poorly trained and in low supply. Hospital equipment is very old and poorly maintained. There is overuse of secondary and tertiary hospitals and underuse of general hospitals.

Using regional indicators: the experience of Europe.

The 1987-1988 health-for-all (HFA) monitoring exercise produced a considerable amount of quantitative and non-quantitative data which were used for the assessment of the progress towards HFA in the European Region. At the same time it demonstrated many shortcomings and problems with regard to the availability and quality of data. Relevance of replies to non-quantitative indicators leaves considerable room for improvements. Good or satisfactory relevance can only be found in about one-third of the country replies. Data on most morbidity indicators, except infectious diseases, were provided on average by one-third of the countries. Nearly two-thirds of the countries provided data on cervical and breast cancer and some occupational diseases. At least half of the data seem not to be comparable; some data are potentially comparable, depending on additional information to be collected. Perceived health estimates are collected by a few countries, but data are not directly comparable. Many countries conduct surveys at different times on one or more aspects of lifestyle. However, comparable data are restricted mainly to educational levels, smoking, alcohol and nutrients. Data on health services and resources are more promising, as they are provided by about two-thirds of the countries.

[Toward health for all in the European region of the WHO. Survey of progress accomplished. II. Preliminary conditions: demographic and health status]. / Vers la santé pour tous dans la région européenne de l'OMS. Surveillance des progrès accomplis. II. Conditions préalables: bilan démographique et sanitaire.

A review of recent progress towards the regional targets set for health for all by the Member States of the European Region of WHO, as regards preliminary conditions for health, and for indicators of mortality, morbidity and disability. Life expectancy, infant and maternal mortality, and mortality from ischaemic heart disease and from traffic accidents show an improvement, as does the incidence of several infectious diseases, but the situation has worsened or stagnated as regards suicide and cancer, and there is a lack of information on disability and chronic morbidity. Despite some progress, the goal of equity in health is still very far from being attained.