Incidence, features and management of radionecrosis in melanoma patients treated with cerebral radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Brain radiotherapy is used in the management of melanoma brain metastases (MBM) and can result in radionecrosis. Anti-PD-1 is active in the brain and may increase the risk of radionecrosis when combined with radiotherapy. We studied the incidence, associated factors and management of radionecrosis in longer-term survivors with MBM treated with this combination. METHODS: Patients with MBM treated with radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 who survived >1 year were identified to determine radionecrosis incidence (Cohort A, n = 135). Cohort A plus additional radionecrosis cases were examined for factors associated with radionecrosis and management (Cohort B, n = 148). RESULTS: From Cohort A, 17% developed radionecrosis, with a cumulative incidence at 2 years of 18%. Using Cohort B, multivariable analysis confirmed an association between radionecrosis and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.0496) and prior treatment with ipilimumab (p = 0.0319). Radionecrosis was diagnosed based on MRI (100%), symptoms (69%) and pathology (56%). Treatment included corticosteroids, bevacizumab and neurosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: Radionecrosis is a significant toxicity in longer-term melanoma survivors with MBM treated with anti-PD-1 and radiotherapy. Identification of those at risk of radionecrosis who may avoid radiotherapy is required.

Two phase I studies of low dose recombinant human IL-12 with Melan-A and influenza peptides in subjects with advanced malignant melanoma.

Preclinical studies have shown that low dose IL-12 can potentiate cytotoxic lymphocyte responses. Since previous trials have demonstrated significant toxicity from high dose recombinant human IL-12 (rhIL-12), we sought to determine an optimal biological dose for rhIL-12 at lower doses when combined with peptide antigens. Two studies were undertaken. The rhIL-12 was administered at doses of 0 (placebo), 10, 30 and 100 ng/kg, subcutaneously in one study and intravenously in the other. Apart from IL-12 dosing, the studies were identical. Subjects had evaluable stage III or IV melanoma which expressed Melan-A by RT-PCR or immunohistochemistry. Melan-A (26-35) (EAAGIGILTV) and influenza matrix (58-66) (GILGFVFTL) peptides were administered intradermally on weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 9. Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled, of whom 24 were evaluable for clinical and immunological responses. Therapy was well tolerated, the main adverse event being influenza-like symptoms. Immunological monitoring included the evaluation of cutaneous reactions and assays for antigen-specific T-cells. Clinical responses included a complete response in a subject with small volume subcutaneous disease, a partial response in a subject with hepatic metastases, and mixed responses in pulmonary, pleural and nodal disease. Biopsies of accessible tumors showed infiltration with CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes capable of lysing Melan-A peptide-pulsed targets in vitro. No clear dose-dependent effect of rhIL-12 could be determined. The rhIL-12 given either s.c. or i.v. was well tolerated at doses of 10-100 ng/kg. Clinical and immunological activity has been observed in this study where peptides were administered either with or without low dose rhIL-12.