RESUMO
Background: Belatacept, a selective T-cell costimulation blocker, was associated with improved survival and renal function but also with a risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in adult kidney transplant recipients in phase 3 trials. This registry examined long-term safety in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-seropositive kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept. Methods: This US-based, prospective, voluntary, multicenter registry (Evaluating Nulojix Long-Term Safety in Transplant [ENLiST]) included adult EBV-seropositive kidney-only transplant recipients treated de novo (within 14 d of transplantation) with belatacept. Primary objectives were to estimate incidence rates of confirmed PTLD, central nervous system (CNS) PTLD, and progressive multifocal encephalopathy (PML). The minimum follow-up was 2 y. Results: Of 985 enrolled transplant recipients, 933 EBV-seropositive patients received belatacept, with 523 (56.1%) receiving concomitant tacrolimus at transplant (for up to 12 mo). By study end, 3 cases of non-CNS PTLD (incidence rate, 0.08/100 person-years), 1 case of CNS PTLD (0.03/100 person-years), and no cases of PML had been reported. Two patients with non-CNS PTLD received concomitant belatacept and tacrolimus and 1 received belatacept and lymphocyte-depleting therapy. Incidence rates were comparable between patients who received concomitant belatacept and tacrolimus and those who did not receive tacrolimus (0.09/100 person-years and 0.07/100 person-years, respectively; P = 0.96). Two of 4 patients with PTLD died, and 2 were alive at the end of the study. Cumulatively, 131 graft losses or deaths were reported by study end. Conclusions: Our results from the ENLiST registry, a large, prospective real-world study, showed that the incidence rates of PTLD and CNS PTLD in belatacept-treated EBV-seropositive transplant recipients were consistent with findings from previous phase 3 trials.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The American Society of Nephrology's (ASN) Workforce Committee created a unique program called the Kidney Mentoring and Awareness Program for Students to engage medical students in the fight against kidney diseases and interest them in careers in nephrology. METHODS: The program provided a framework and 2 years of funding to three medical schools to organize and carry out health screenings in underserved areas of their communities as well as a structure for student mentoring by the practicing nephrologists. RESULTS: The Workforce Committee identified three medical schools (Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN and University of Louisville, Louisville, KY) and engaged faculty at each school to serve as advisors. The ASN committed funding to the groups for 2 years, after which the groups became self-sufficient. Three nephrologists participated in each chapter, building on existing relationships with community groups to identify sites and carry out kidney screening events. CONCLUSIONS: We report here the experience of those chapters and a blueprint for other schools interested in setting up a similarly structured program to interest students in nephrology while working with community groups to spread awareness of the major underlying causes of kidney disease.
