Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the transplant pancreas in the post-operative setting.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Vascular thrombosis is the most common cause of early graft loss after transplantation. Routine grayscale and Doppler ultrasound frequently fail to adequately visualize vascular compromise. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a novel approach to identifying these complications. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 22 consecutive patients who received pancreas transplant at our institution between 2017 and 2018. All allografts were implanted with systemic venous and enteric exocrine drainage. Perfusion was assessed in the immediate post-operative period using grayscale, Doppler, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Imaging findings were compared between those who required surgical re-intervention and those who did not in order to evaluate for differences in perfusion. RESULTS: Of the 22 transplants, 15 did not require surgical re-intervention and were considered normal. These allografts demonstrated prompt and uniform enhancement, with washout usually by 90 seconds. All patients who had abnormal CEUS underwent re-exploration. Perfusion was acceptable or restored in all cases. Two patients ultimately required allograft pancreatectomy. Two patients had normal glands, and the remaining 3 grafts were salvaged following intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound provides rapid evaluation of allograft perfusion following pancreas transplantation. The differences in perfusion provide a novel way of evaluating for complications in the immediate post-transplant period.

A dedicated paracentesis clinic decreases healthcare utilization for serial paracenteses in decompensated cirrhosis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to describe the effect of a dedicated paracentesis clinic on healthcare utilization by patients with decompensated cirrhosis and refractory ascites. METHODS: This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study identified cirrhotic patients receiving paracenteses over a 6-month period before and after creating the paracentesis clinic. Patients were followed for 12 months to collect outcome data including characteristics of subsequent hospitalizations and paracenteses. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between the paracentesis clinic and outcomes. RESULTS: There were 183 patients and 1364 paracenteses performed during the study time period. Age, gender, cirrhosis etiology, MELD, Child-Pugh, and Charlson comorbidity index were comparable between the two groups. Rates of mortality, transplant, and hospitalization were also similar during 1 year follow-up. After establishment of the paracentesis clinic, median paracenteses per patient increased from 2 (IQR 1-7) to 4 (IQR 2-11) (P = 0.01); albumin replacement after paracenteses ≥ 5 L improved from 76.3% to 91.7% (P < 0.001); and the fraction of outpatient paracenteses performed in the emergency department decreased from 13.4% to 3.8% (P < 0.001). Major complications remained negligible at 0.81% across both time periods. While fewer patients were admitted for ascites after the paracentesis clinic (39.6% vs. 20.8%, P = 0.009), more patients had acute kidney injury (AKI) during follow-up (47.2% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.02), with a trend towards more AKI admissions (22.6% vs. 35.4%, P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: A dedicated paracentesis clinic can improve access and wait times, while also reducing admissions for ascites and paracenteses performed in the emergency department.

Risk factors for bleeding after liver biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: Determine factors that increase the risk of bleeding after liver biopsy. METHODS: Retrospective review of radiology and clinical databases from Jan 2008 to Jun 2014 revealed 847 patients with liver biopsy. Of these, 154 (group I) had targeted biopsy of focal lesion and 142 (group 2) had random core biopsy for diffuse liver disease. The rest of the patients were excluded due to insufficient post-biopsy data. Data including pre-biopsy laboratory results, history of transfusion, and biopsy complications were recorded in the study cohort. After review of initial results, a "Risk Score" for bleeding was created using platelet count, INR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and suspicion of malignancy. Zero point was given for normal laboratory results or absence of malignancy. One point was given for mildly abnormal laboratory values or presence of malignancy. Severe biochemical abnormalities, e.g., INR > 2.0, eGFR < 30 mL/min, or platelet count ≤ 50 × 10(9)/L were given two points each. The "Risk Score" was made of adding individual points. RESULTS: Of 847 patients queried by retrospective database search, 296 had adequate records for the period of 2 weeks prior to biopsy to 4 weeks after biopsy. The remaining patients had liver biopsy as outpatients and probably did not have bleeding complications but no electronic records were found to confirm this. 25 (8.4%) of 296 patients had post-biopsy bleeding, with incidences of 11.7% and 4.9% in groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.04). On logistic regression analysis, the only significant predictor of bleeding was the "Risk Score" (p = 0.01, odds ratio 4.6). There was substantial overlap in INR, and platelet count in bleeders vs. non-bleeders. Pre-biopsy fresh frozen plasma or platelet concentrate infusions did not reduce the risk of bleeding. CONCLUSION: INR and platelet count are not an independent risk factors for post-biopsy bleeding. A "Risk Score" made up of individual risk factors was a better predictor of bleeding.