Addition of clobazam successfully treating drug resistant seizures in Heidenhain variant Creutzfeldt Jakob disease: A case report.

Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease (CJD) is a rapidly progressive and fatal neurodegenerative disease that is uncommonly accompanied with seizures. In this case report, we describe a 63-year-old male patient who presented with a 3-week history of visual disturbances and clonic movement of his left arm. Additionally, the patient was reported to have developed erratic behaviors along with insomnia during this period. An EEG showed 4 electrographic seizures of bilateral temporo-occipital onset characterized by 1.5 Hz periodic discharges, lasting 2-13 min. Levetiracetam was started and titrated to the maximal dose however seizures continued so lacosamide and clonazepam were initiated. Despite these aggressive treatments, seizures continued, and oral clobazam 5 mg BID replaced clonazepam. Continued electrographic seizures warranted an increase in clobazam to 10 mg BID after which the seizures stopped; of note, lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs) remained. The patient's symptoms were consistent with the Heidenhain variant, along with probable CJD due to positive RT-QuIC assay, positive 14-3-3 protein, MRI FLAIR hyperintensities, and EEG findings. Although the patient passed away 3 weeks following admission as a result of CJD, we propose that there may be clinical benefit in the use of clobazam in suspected CJD patients presenting with seizures, and its use merits further investigation.

Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Routine Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: A 10-hospital regional network transitioned to tenecteplase as the standard of care stroke thrombolytic in September 2019 because of potential workflow advantages and reported noninferior clinical outcomes relative to alteplase in meta-analyses of randomized trials. We assessed whether tenecteplase use in routine clinical practice reduced thrombolytic workflow times with noninferior clinical outcomes. METHODS: We designed a prospective registry-based observational, sequential cohort comparison of tenecteplase- (n=234) to alteplase-treated (n=354) stroke patients. We hypothesized: (1) an increase in the proportion of patients meeting target times for target door-to-needle time and transfer door-in-door-out time, and (2) noninferior favorable (discharge to home with independent ambulation) and unfavorable (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice) in the tenecteplase group. Total hospital cost associated with each treatment was also compared. RESULTS: Target door-to-needle time within 45 minutes for all patients was superior for tenecteplase, 41% versus 29%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.85 (95% CI, 1.27-2.71); P=0.001; 58% versus 41% by Get With The Guidelines criteria. Target door-in-door-out time within 90 minutes was superior for tenecteplase 37% (15/43) versus 14% (9/65); adjusted odds ratio, 3.62 (95% CI, 1.30-10.74); P=0.02. Favorable outcome for tenecteplase fell within the 6.5% noninferiority margin; adjusted odds ratio, 1.26 (95% CI, 0.89-1.80). Unfavorable outcome was less for tenecteplase, 7.3% versus 11.9%, adjusted odds ratio, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.42-1.37) but did not fall within the prespecified 1% noninferior boundary. Net benefit (%favorable-%unfavorable) was greater for the tenecteplase sample: 37% versus 27%. P=0.02. Median cost per hospital encounter was less for tenecteplase cases ($13 382 versus $15 841; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to tenecteplase in routine clinical practice in a 10-hospital network was associated with shorter door-to-needle time and door-in-door-out times, noninferior favorable clinical outcomes at discharge, and reduced hospital costs. Evaluation in larger, multicenter cohorts is recommended to determine if these observations generalize.

Identification and treatment of cervical and oromandibular dystonia in acutely brain-injured patients.

INTRODUCTION: Primary cervical and oromandibular dystonia (CD and OMD, respectively) are well-recognized movement disorders, often treated with botulinum toxin (BTx). In contrast, dystonia related to acute brain injuries is not well delineated. Our objective was to define in neurocritically ill patients the clinical characteristics of CD and OMD and to investigate the safety of BTx. METHODS: All acutely brain-injured patients admitted to a neurocritical care unit over a 10-month period were prospectively screened for CD and OMD. Clinical characteristics, etiology of brain injury, and pattern of dystonia were analyzed. Patients with clinically significant CD and OMD were treated with BTx and followed for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Of 165 patients screened, 33 had new-onset CD or OMD. Of 21 patients enrolled, 14 had CD, 5 had OMD, and 2 had both. The pattern of brain injury included 13 cerebral hemorrhages, 6 ischemic strokes, 1 status epilepticus, and 1 unclear etiology. Improvement after BTx was seen in four of seven patients with CD and two of four with OMD; no adverse effects occurred. Spontaneous improvement was recorded in 7 of 11 nontreated patients with CD or OMD. CONCLUSIONS: Acute secondary CD or OMD, associated with a variety of causes, was identified in 20% of acutely brain-injured patients. The temporal profile of dystonia onset and resolution in these patients was variable. Treatment with BTx in the neurocritical care setting seems to be safe. Future, larger scale randomized studies should evaluate the effectiveness of BTx treatment in this patient population.