Assessing the suitability of the carotid bifurcation for stenting: Anatomic and morphologic considerations.

OBJECTIVE: Over the years where stents have been used to treat carotid lesions, a great deal has been learned about which anatomic characteristics lead to adverse outcomes. This review summarizes the anatomic and morphologic characteristics of the carotid vasculature that can help guide patient selection and clinical decision-making. METHODS: Each of the carotid artery anatomy and lesion characteristics that are relevant to carotid stenting is described in detail. These are accompanied with evidence-based outcomes and results. RESULTS: Data on the prevalence of carotid artery lesions that are unsuitable for stenting are summarized and the implications of these data for practice are discussed, especially as they pertain to transcarotid artery revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery stenting can be a viable option for carotid revascularization, but the lesion must be acceptable and safe for stent placement. There should be thorough assessment to rule out the presence of severe tortuosity, long-segment disease, severe calcification (circumferential or exophytic), mobile plaque, swollen internal carotid artery sign, and carotid diameters outside the acceptable range. In carefully chosen lesions with the absence of the unfavorable characteristics described, transcarotid artery revascularization may offer improved periprocedural success and carotid artery stenting may attain better long-term durability.

A novel approach to high-grade carotid stenosis with concomitant extracranial carotid aneurysms using transcarotid artery revascularization.

We present the novel application of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) in two high-risk patients with high-grade internal artery stenosis and concomitant atherosclerotic extracranial carotid artery aneurysms (ECAAs). ECAAs account for <1% of arterial aneurysms and are usually clinically silent at presentation. Historically, the treatment of ECAAs has been via open reconstruction or stent grafting. TCAR is an effective alternative for carotid revascularization in high-risk patients with high-grade carotid stenosis, but has not been widely used for aneurysmal management. We report two cases to describe our management of concomitant carotid stenoses and ECCA with TCAR.

Early Outcomes in the ROADSTER 2 Study of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Patients With Significant Carotid Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is comprised of carotid artery stent placement with cerebral protection via proximal carotid artery clamping and reversal of cerebral arterial flow. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TCAR performed by a broad group of physicians with variable TCAR experience. METHODS: The ROADSTER 2 study is a prospective, open label, single arm, multicenter, postapproval registry for patients undergoing TCAR. Patients considered at high risk for complications from carotid endarterectomy with symptomatic stenosis ≥50% or asymptomatic stenosis ≥80% were included. The primary end point was procedural success, which encompassed technical success plus the absence of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death within the 30-day postoperative period. Secondary end points included technical success and individual/composite rates of stroke, death, and myocardial infarction (MI). All patients underwent independent neurological assessments before the procedure, within 24 hours, and at 30 days after TCAR. An independent clinical events committee adjudicated all major adverse events. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2019, 692 patients (Intent to Treat Population) were enrolled at 43 sites. Sixty cases had major protocol violations, leaving 632 patients adhering to the Food and Drug Administration-approved protocol (per-protocol population). The majority (81.2%) of operators were TCAR naïve before study initiation. Patients underwent TCAR for neurological symptoms in 26% of cases, and all patients had high-risk factors for carotid endarterectomy (anatomic-related 44%; physiological 32%; both 24%). Technical success occurred in 99.7% of all cases. The primary end point of procedural success rate in the Intent to Treat population was 96.5% (per-protocol 97.9%). The early postoperative outcomes in the Intent to Treat population included stroke in 13 patients (1.9%), death in 3 patients (0.4%), and MI in 6 patients (0.9%). The composite 30-day stroke/death rate was 2.3%, and stroke/death/MI rate was 3.2%. In the per-protocol population, there were strokes in 4 patients (0.6%), death in one patient (0.2%), and MI in 6 patients (0.9%) leading to a composite 30-day stroke/death rate of 0.8% and stroke/death/MI rate of 1.7%. CONCLUSIONS: TCAR results in excellent early outcomes with high technical success combined with low rates of postprocedure stroke and death. These results were achieved by a majority of operators new to this technology at the start of the trial. Adherence to the study protocol and peri-procedural antiplatelet therapy optimizes outcomes. Longer-term follow-up data are needed to confirm these early outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02536378.

Staged Combined Endovascular and Open Surgical Approach in a Patient with Takayasu's Arteritis.

Takayasu's arteritis (TA) is a systemic large vessel vasculitis that affects the aorta and its branches. Most patients with TA respond to medical therapy with a minority of patients requiring surgical intervention. In our report, we describe the case of a 59-year-old Caucasian female with TA who underwent revascularization due to cerebrovascular symptoms refractory to medical therapy. She initially presented with amaurosis fugax and developed episodes of syncope and slurred speech during corticosteroid tapering. Vascular studies showed right common carotid artery (RCCA), left internal carotid artery (LICA), and left subclavian artery (LSA) occlusion with the right vertebral artery (RVA) ostium stenosis, and retrograde flow through the left vertebral artery (LVA). The sole source of cerebral perfusion flowed through her stenosed RVA, so it was decided to first stent the RVA to restore adequate posterior cerebral circulation before creating a right subclavian artery to RCCA bypass to restore anterior circulation. This case represents the successful management of TA utilizing a two-staged combined endovascular and surgical approach.

Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal.

OBJECTIVE: This report presents the 30-day results of the Safety and Efficacy Study for Reverse Flow Used During Carotid Artery Stenting Procedure (ROADSTER) multicenter trial and evaluates the safety and efficacy of ENROUTE Transcarotid NPS (Silk Road Medical Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif), a novel transcarotid neuroprotection system that provides direct surgical common carotid access and cerebral embolic protection via high-rate flow reversal during carotid artery stenting (CAS). METHODS: A prospective, single-arm, multicenter clinical trial was performed to evaluate the use of the ENROUTE Transcarotid NPS during CAS procedures performed in patients considered to be at high risk for complications from carotid endarterectomy. Symptomatic patients with ≥50% stenosis and asymptomatic patients with ≥70% stenosis were eligible to be treated with any U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved carotid artery stent. The primary end point was the composite of all stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death at 30 days postprocedure as defined in the Food and Drug Administration-approved study protocol. Secondary end points included cranial nerve injury; 30-day stroke, death, stroke/death, and MI; acute device, technical, and procedural success; and access site complications. All major adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee. RESULTS: Between November 2012 and July 2014, 208 patients were enrolled at 18 sites. Sixty-seven patients were enrolled as lead-in cases, and 141 were enrolled in the pivotal phase. In the pivotal cohort, 26% were symptomatic and 75% were asymptomatic. Acute device and technical success were 99% (140 of 141). By hierarchical analysis, the all-stroke rate in the pivotal group was 1.4% (2 of 141), stroke and death was 2.8% (4 of 141), and stroke, death and MI was 3.5% (5 of 141). One patient (0.7%) experienced postoperative hoarseness from potential Xth cranial nerve injury, which completely resolved at the 6-month follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the ROADSTER trial demonstrate that the use of the ENROUTE Transcarotid NPS is safe and effective at preventing stroke during CAS. The overall stroke rate of 1.4% is the lowest reported to date for any prospective, multicenter clinical trial of CAS.

Alterations of Smad expression and activation in defining 2 subtypes of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We postulated that disruptions of the canonical transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ß)/Smad signaling pathway might contribute to the development of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: A cohort of 798 HNSCC tumor samples from 346 patients were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to define the pattern of expression of (phospho)Smad2, (phospho)Smad3, and Smad4. RESULTS: We found that 19%, 40%, and 12% of HNSCC specimens failed to express pSmad2, pSmad3, or Smad4, respectively. Loss of Smad2/3 activation was observed in 8.5% of specimens. In addition, 4% of specimens failed to express only Smad4. Moreover, patients with pSmad2/3-negative tumors had a significantly better overall survival than that of those whose tumors expressed activated Smad2/3. In contrast, loss of Smad4 expression did not have prognostic significance. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that HNSCC in which Smad2/3 are inactivated or in which Smad4 expression is lost represent 2 distinct tumor subtypes with different clinical outcomes.

Carotid angioplasty and stenting in anatomically high-risk patients: Safe and durable except for radiation-induced stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is used in patients considered high-risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Patients qualify as high-risk because of medical comorbid conditions or for anatomic considerations (previous CEA, radical neck dissection, radiation). We compared the technical feasibility and durability of CAS in medically high-risk patients (MED) vs anatomically high-risk patients (ANAT). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all consecutive patients undergoing CAS by a single vascular surgery group. All patients were high risk and evaluated with duplex ultrasound imaging and angiography. Primary end points were technical success, 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), death, and in-stent restenosis. Standard statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier life tables. RESULTS: From January 2003 to December 2007, 230 CAS (98 ANAT, 132 MED) procedures were attempted. The ANAT cohort comprised 84 patients with a single anatomic risk factor: 71 with a previous ipsilateral CEA, 6 high lesions, 6 history of neck radiation, and 1 with a tracheostomy. Ten patients had two or three anatomic risk factors: nine with radical neck dissection and radiation and one with neck radiation and ipsilateral CEA. The mean age was 71.1 years for ANAT vs 73.9 years for MED (P = .021). Technical success rates were 98% in ANAT and 98.5% in MED (P = .76). Thirty-day stroke rate was 1.0% in ANAT and 5.3% in MED (P = .14); the mortality rate was 2.0% in ANAT and 0.8% in MED (P = .79). The 2-year survival free from stroke was MED, 93.6% and ANAT, 98.9% (P = .118); and from restenosis was MED, 91.9%; and ANAT, 91.0% (P = .98). Two-year overall survival was significantly better in ANAT (84.6%) vs MED (70.1%; P = .026). Four of the seven restenoses in the ANAT group occurred in patients with previous neck radiation. The restenosis rate for radiation-induced (RAD) stenosis treated with CAS was significantly higher at 22.2% (4 of 18) compared with 3.8% (3 of 78) in ANAT group patients without a history of radiation (non-RAD; P = .028). The 2-year restenosis-free survival was 72.7% in the RAD group vs 95.9% in the non-RAD group (P = .017). CONCLUSION: CAS is as technically feasible, safe, and durable in anatomically high-risk patients as in medically high-risk patients, with similar rates of periprocedural stroke and death and late restenosis. However, patients with radiation-induced stenosis appear to be at an increased risk for restenosis.

Stenting and angioplasty with protection in patients at high-risk for endarterectomy: SAPPHIRE Worldwide Registry first 2,001 patients.

BACKGROUND: Previously, the Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection of Patients with High Risk for Endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE) randomized trial showed that carotid artery stenting (CAS) was not inferior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the treatment of high-surgical risk patients. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the SAPPHIRE Worldwide Registry is to evaluate 30-day major adverse events (MAE) after CAS performed by physicians with varied experience and utilizing a formal training program. Data will be analyzed on the overall patient population and by high-risk inclusion criteria. METHODS: SAPPHIRE Worldwide is a multicenter, prospective, postapproval registry to evaluate CAS with distal protection in patients at high-risk for surgery using the Cordis PRECISE Nitinol Stent and ANGIOGUARD XP/RX Emboli Capture Guidewire. Participating physicians are encouraged to treat patients according to their standard of practice and consistent with current Food and Drug Administration-approved labeling. RESULTS: Enrollment began in October 2006. Data are available on the first 2,001 patients enrolled and followed to 30 days. Of these patients, the mean age was 72.2 +/- 9.75 yr; 62% were male; and 27.7% were symptomatic. Entry criteria for surgical high-risk included anatomic (n = 716), physiologic (n = 918), or both risk factors (n = 327). At 30-day follow-up, the MAE was 4.4% (death 1.1%, stroke 3.2%, MI 0.7%) for the overall population. Patients with anatomic risk had a significantly lower 30-day MAE than patients with physiologic risk (2.8% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.0306), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While the number of physicians performing CAS continues to increase, MAE rates seen in this registry (4.4%) are well within an acceptable range, as was first seen in the SAPPHIRE randomized trial (4.8%). A significant decrease in MAE was seen in patients with anatomic risk compared with physiologic risk factors. The SAPPHIRE Worldwide Registry supports the use of CAS as an alternative to CEA in patients who are at high-risk for surgery due to anatomic risk factors.