Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heart Rhythm ; 21(6): 836-844, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38336193

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The PRAETORIAN score estimates the risk of failure of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) therapy by using generator and lead positioning on bidirectional chest radiographs. The PRospective randomized compArative trial of subcutanEous implanTable cardiOverter-defibrillatoR ImplANtation with and without DeFibrillation Testing (PRAETORIAN-DFT) investigates whether PRAETORIAN score calculation is noninferior to defibrillation testing (DFT) with regard to first shock efficacy in spontaneous events. OBJECTIVE: This prespecified subanalysis assessed the predictive value of the PRAETORIAN score for defibrillation success in induced ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: This multicenter investigator-initiated trial randomized 965 patients between DFT and PRAETORIAN score calculation after de novo S-ICD implantation. Successful DFT was defined as conversion of induced ventricular arrhythmia in <5 seconds from shock delivery within 2 attempts. Bidirectional chest radiographs were obtained after implantation. The predictive value of the PRAETORIAN score for DFT success was calculated for patients in the DFT arm. RESULTS: In total, 482 patients were randomized to undergo DFT. Of these patients, 457 (95%) underwent DFT according to protocol, of whom 445 (97%) had successful DFT and 12 (3%) had failed DFT. A PRAETORIAN score of ≥90 had a positive predictive value of 25% for failed DFT, and a PRAETORIAN score of <90 had a negative predictive value of 99% for successful DFT. A PRAETORIAN score of ≥90 was the strongest independent predictor for failed DFT (odds ratio 33.77; confidence interval 6.13-279.95; P < .001). CONCLUSION: A PRAETORIAN score of <90 serves as a reliable indicator for DFT success in patients with S-ICD, and a PRAETORIAN score of ≥90 is a strong predictor for DFT failure.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Cardioversão Elétrica , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cardioversão Elétrica/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Taquicardia Ventricular/fisiopatologia , Fibrilação Ventricular/terapia
2.
Heart Rhythm O2 ; 2(5): 463-471, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34667961

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: High adherence to remote monitoring (RM) in pacemaker (PM) patients improves outcomes; however, adherence remains suboptimal. Bluetooth low-energy (BLE) technology in newer-generation PMs enables communication directly with patient-owned smart devices using an app without a bedside console. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the success rate of scheduled RM transmissions using the app compared to other RM methods. METHODS: The BlueSync Field Evaluation was a prospective, international cohort evaluation, measuring the success rate of scheduled RM transmissions using a BLE PM or cardiac resynchronization therapy PM coupled with the MyCareLink Heart app. App transmission success was compared to 3 historical "control" groups from the Medtronic de-identified CareLink database: (1) PM patients with manual communication using a wand with a bedside console (PM manual transmission), (2) PM patients with wireless automatic communication with the bedside console (PM wireless); (3) defibrillator patients with similar automatic communication (defibrillator wireless). RESULTS: Among 245 patients enrolled (age 64.8±15.6 years, 58.4% men), 953 transmissions were scheduled through 12 months, of which 902 (94.6%) were successfully completed. In comparison, transmission success rates were 56.3% for PM manual transmission patients, 77.0% for PM wireless patients, and 87.1% for defibrillator wireless patients. Transmission success with the app was superior across matched cohorts based on age, sex, and device type (single vs dual vs triple chamber). CONCLUSION: The success rate of scheduled RM transmissions was higher among patients using the smart device app compared to patients using traditional RM using bedside consoles. This novel technology may improve patient engagement and adherence to RM.

3.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 31(7): 1784-1792, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32412126

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The novel two-lead cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-DX system utilizes a floating atrial dipole on the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead, and when implanted with a left ventricular (LV) lead, offers a two-lead CRT system with AV synchrony. This study compared complication rates and CRT response among subjects implanted with a two-lead CRT-DX system to those subjects implanted with a standard three-lead CRT-D system. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 240 subjects from the Sentus QP-Extended CRT Evaluation with Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads postapproval study were selected to identify 120 matched pairs based on similar demographic characteristics using a Greedy algorithm. The complication-free rate was evaluated as the primary endpoint. All-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, device diagnostic data, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improvement, and defibrillator therapy were evaluated from clinical data, in-office interrogations, and remote monitoring throughout the follow-up period. Complication-free survival favored the CRT-DX group with 92.5% without a major complication compared to 85.0% in the CRT-D cohort (P = .0495; 95% confidence interval: 0.1%-14.9%) over a mean follow-up of 1.3 and 1.4 years, respectively. Incidence of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, NYHA changes at 6 months postimplant, and percent of LV pacing during CRT therapy were similar in both device cohorts. Inappropriate shocks were more frequent in the CRT-D cohort with 5.8% of subjects receiving an inappropriate shock vs 0.8% in the CRT-DX cohort. CONCLUSION: The results of this subanalysis demonstrate that the CRT-DX system can provide similar CRT responses and significantly fewer complications when compared to a similar cohort with a conventional three-lead CRT-D system.


Assuntos
Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Dispositivos de Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , New York , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Card Fail ; 14(6): 489-96, 2008 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18672197

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In congestive heart failure (CHF), a low body temperature at hospital admission predicts in-hospital mortality. We hypothesized that a postdischarge reduction in body temperature predicts early CHF rehospitalization and death. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 198 patients discharged after CHF hospitalization. We categorized the patients as hypothermic or normothermic (cutoff point, 36.3 degrees C/97.4 degrees F) according to body temperature at discharge. We classified the 2 groups according to the direction of temperature change between discharge and the first follow-up visit: normothermic/non-decreasing temperature (N+), normothermic/decreasing temperature (N-), hypothermic/non-decreasing temperature (H+), and hypothermic/decreasing temperature (H-). RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (47%) had decreasing temperatures, and 105 patients (53%) had non-decreasing temperatures. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant intergroup difference in survival (P = .01) and rehospitalization time (P = .005). On logistic regression, a decreasing temperature was significantly associated with rehospitalization within 180 days (odds ratio, 4.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-10.02; P = .003). On Cox regression, the hazard ratios for death were 3.19 (P = .07), 6.49 (P = .004), and 5.17 (P = .07), for the N-, H+, and H- groups, respectively, versus the N+ group. For rehospitalization time, the hazard ratios were 7.02 (P = .01), 4.24 (P = .08), and 13.43 (P = .005) for the N-, H+, and H- groups, respectively, versus the N+ group. CONCLUSION: Decreasing body temperatures can predict readmission, decreased time to rehospitalization, and (in combination with hypothermia) decreased survival.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Hipotermia/mortalidade , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Temperatura Corporal/fisiologia , Seguimentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Hipotermia/complicações , Hipotermia/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...