Evaluation of the Effects of Probiotics and Prebiotics on the Salmonella typhi Infections.

Typhoid fever is one of the most commonly disseminated diseases and is considered to be linked to poor sanitation. It is responsible for 2-5% of all deaths, and its causative agent is Salmonella typhi. The current study aimed to investigate the antibacterial activity of prebiotics (inulin and starch) and probiotics against multidrug resistance of S. typhi bacterial isolates. Determination of the inhibitory effect of probiotics and prebiotics against S. typhi isolates was performed by agar well diffusion method and minimal inhibitory concentration. Body samples of all eligible patients were collected and cultured. Finally, 50 (25%) out of the total cultured samples were S. Typhi bacteria isolated from different samples. The bacteria were mainly found in blood, followed by stool and fluid (74%, 24%, and 2%, respectively). On differential medium, xylose lysine deoxycholate agar, the colonies appear red with black centers, while on MacConkey agar, the colonies appear smooth, pale, transparent, colorless, and raised. Regarding the inhibition zone values of bacteriocins of Lactobacillus from Yogurt against S. typhi in plate, significant differences were identified between the ones with and without prebiotic addition. Accordingly, the value of the inhibition zone for those without prebiotic addition (13.18±7.403) was significantly lower than that of cutoff values of 20 with a significant difference of -6.820 (t= -6.514, df 49, P=0.000). Moreover, the inhibition effect of prebiotics (inulin and starch) against S. typhi at 37 °C for 24 h in part dish glucose as control, only the mean of inulin was found to be significantly lower than that of the cutoff value of 18 with the mean difference of -3.900 (t=-4.115, df 49, P=0.000). Other prebiotics of glucose and starch in 24 h showed negative inhibition. Probiotics are live microorganisms that have beneficial host effects by enhancing microbial balance in the intestine, whereas prebiotics are indigestible food components having beneficial effects by enhancing the activity and growth of one or more colonic bacteria. Lactobacillus filtrates had considerable effects against the test S. typhi isolates.

Self-Collected Anterior Nasal and Saliva Specimens versus Health Care Worker-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2.

We prospectively compared health care worker-collected nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) to self-collected anterior nasal swabs (ANS) and straight saliva for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in 354 patients. The percent positive agreement between NPS and ANS or saliva was 86.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.7 to 92.9%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 86.0 to 97.9%), respectively. The percent negative agreement was 99.6% (95% CI, 98.0 to 100.0%) for NPS versus ANS and 97.8% (95% CI, 95.3 to 99.2%) for NPS versus saliva. More cases were detected by the use of NPS (n = 80) and saliva (n = 81) than by the use of ANS (n = 70), but no single specimen type detected all severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections.

Use of atomoxetine and suicidal ideation in children and adolescents: Results of an observational cohort study within general practice in England.

AIM: To investigate the association between atomoxetine, a drug used in the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and suicidal ideation, within a cohort of 2-18-year-old patients in England. METHODS: The study was conducted using the observational cohort technique of Modified prescription event monitoring (M-PEM). Patients prescribed atomoxetine were identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by primary care physicians. A customised postal GP questionnaire was used to capture outcome data for suicidal ideation. A matched pair cohort analysis was performed within patients to compare the risk of suicidal ideation in the period after starting atomoxetine with the risk prior to starting atomoxetine; this was stratified by age and concomitant use of methylphenidate. Additional information on patient characteristics, and events of interest was also collected; individual cases of suicidal ideation were qualitatively assessed for drug relatedness. RESULTS: Of the final cohort (n=4509); 85.5% male (n=3857), median age 11 years (IQR: 9,14). Primary prescribing indication for atomoxetine was ADHD (n=4261, 94.6%). Almost a quarter of the cohort had been co-prescribed methylphenidate. Results of the matched pair cohort analysis indicated that the period after starting atomoxetine was not associated with an increase in the incidence of suicidal ideation compared to the period prior to starting treatment (RR: 0.71; CI: 0.48-1.07; P-value: 0.104). Individual case assessment of suicidal ideation suggested a causal association within a number of cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no evidence of an increased risk of suicidal ideation during treatment with atomoxetine, compared to the period prior to starting treatment. Amongst age specific subgroups, this risk may change. Nonetheless, individual case assessment suggested a causal relationship in some patients, hence physicians need to be aware of the possibility of developing this event, and furthermore consider how best to detect it in this paediatric population. This study demonstrates the importance of combining quantitative statistical analyses with a qualitative case series assessment.

Synchronous metastatic skull base chordoma to the breast: case report and literature review.

CLINICAL SCENARIO: During routine staging work-up for a left breast mass, a 68-year-old woman complained of dysphagia and dysphonia. During further investigations, a left-sided lesion at the foramen magnum was observed on brain imaging. Both lesions were biopsied and showed a classical chordoma. MANAGEMENT: The skull-base lesion and the breast lesion were surgically resected, and adjuvant radiotherapy was given. SUMMARY: Chordoma is a rare primary central nervous system tumour that seldom metastasizes. The lung is the most common site of metastasis. Synchronous breast metastasis from a skull-base chordoma is very rare, and a safe management option includes a maximum resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy.

Utilisation of extended release quetiapine (Seroquel XL™): Results from an observational cohort study in England.

BACKGROUND: A post-authorisation safety study was carried out as part of the EU Risk Management Plan to examine the long-term (up to 12 months) use of quetiapine XL as prescribed in general practice in England. AIM: To present a description of the drug utilisation characteristics of quetiapine XL. METHODS: An observational, population-based cohort design using the technique of Modified Prescription-Event Monitoring (M-PEM). Patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by general practitioners (GPs) for quetiapine XL between September 2008 and February 2013. Questionnaires were sent to GPs 12 months following the 1st prescription for each individual patient, requesting drug utilisation information. Cohort accrual was extended to recruit additional elderly patients (special population of interest). Summary descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: The final M-PEM cohort consisted of 13,276 patients; median age 43 years (IQR: 33, 55) and 59.0% females. Indications for prescribing included bipolar disorder (n=3820), MDD (n=2844), schizophrenia (n=2373) and other (non-licensed) indications (n=3750). Where specified, 59.3% (7869/13,276) were reported to have used quetiapine IR (immediate release formulation) previously at any time. The median start dose was highest for patients with schizophrenia (300 mg/day [IQR 150, 450]). The final elderly cohort consisted of 3127 patients and 28.5% had indications associated with dementia. The median start dose for elderly patients was highest for patients with schizophrenia or BD (both 100mg/day [IQR 50, 300]). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of off-label prescribing in terms of indication and high doses was common, as was use in special populations such as the very elderly. Whilst off-label use may be unavoidable in certain situations, GPs may need to re-evaluate prescribing in circumstances where there may be safety concerns. This study demonstrates the ongoing importance of observational studies such as M-PEM to gather real-world clinical data to support the post-marketing benefit:risk management of new medications, or existing medications for which license extensions have been approved.

Sudden cardiac and sudden unexpected death related to antipsychotics: A meta-analysis of observational studies.

To estimate the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) or sudden unexpected death (SUD) related to individual antipsychotics, a meta-analysis of observational studies was performed. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) of SCD/SUD with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted and pooled; heterogeneity was studied using Q statistic and I(2) index, and its potential causes (e.g., hERG blockade potency) explored using meta-regression. Two cohort (740,306 person-years) and four case-control (2,557 cases; 17,670 controls) studies, investigating nine antipsychotics, were included. Compared with nonusers, the risk was increased for quetiapine (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.33-2.23), olanzapine (OR = 2.04, 1.52-2.74), risperidone (OR = 3.04, 2.39-3.86), haloperidol (OR = 2.97, 1.59-5.54), clozapine (OR = 3.67, 1.94-6.94), and thioridazine (OR = 4.58, 2.09-10.05). Heterogeneity was found (Q = 20.0, P = 0.01; I(2) = 60.0%), and the increasing mean hERG blockade potency (P = 0.01) accounted for 43% of this. The SCD/SUD risk differed between individual antipsychotics, and mean hERG blockade potency could be an explanatory factor. This should be considered when initiating antipsychotic treatment.

Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of polyherbal preparation UNIM-352 in experimental models of bronchial asthma.

Bronchial asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways and pharmacotherapy is dependent on anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator agents. However, adverse effects of these agents on chronic administration and sometimes non-responsiveness to these drugs have prompted the search for viable alternatives from medicinal plant sources. UNIM-352 is a polyherbal preparation traditionally used in the Unani system of Indian medicine for the treatment of bronchial asthma. The present study defines the possible cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of UNIM-352 in experimental models of bronchial asthma and validates the observed therapeutically beneficial effects. Wistar rats were immunized and challenged with ovalbumin, and blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid were assayed for cytological and biochemical markers. UNIM-352 (200 and 400 mg/kg) markedly reduced the eosinophil and neutrophil counts in both blood and BAL compared to control. The polyherbal agent also attenuated the levels of TNF-α, IL-4, GM-CSF and NF-κB whereas histone deacetylase (HDAC) levels were elevated, in both blood and BAL fluid. All effects of UNIM-352 were comparable with the standard drug, prednisolone. The results demonstrated possible cellular and molecular mechanisms of UNIM-352 and thus explain its beneficial effects in bronchial asthma.

Utilization of fentanyl buccal tablets in England: exploring off-label use reported in a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl citrate buccal tablets are indicated for the treatment of breakthrough pain (BTP) in cancer, in adults who are receiving maintenance opioid therapy for chronic cancer pain. OBJECTIVE: One of the objectives of this study was to describe the utilization characteristics of patients prescribed fentanyl buccal and to assess how the product is being used in relation to the terms of license of marketing approval. METHODS: An observational post-marketing cohort study was conducted. For the analysis of this study, exposure data were collected from dispensed prescriptions issued by general practitioners (GPs) between March 2009 and June 2011. Outcome data (indication, event, patient demographic and selected clinical characteristics) were collected by sending questionnaires to GPs at least 6 months after the drug was first prescribed. Summary descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 551 patients, of which 54.8% (n = 302 patients) were female. The median age for the cohort was 62 years (interquartile range: 50-72 years), with one patient (0.2%) aged less than 18 years. A primary indication of BTP in cancer was reported for 61.9% (n = 341) patients. Regular opioid therapy was reported upon starting the treatment for 383 patients (69.5% of cohort). In total, 69 patients (12.5%) had one or more contraindications for use. The most frequent initial titration dose was 100 µg/day (n = 247). CONCLUSIONS: The final study results show that fentanyl buccal is largely being prescribed according to the terms of the license in general practice in England, but off-licence use and use in the presence of contraindications and warnings have been reported.

Heavy metal and disinfectant resistance of Listeria monocytogenes from foods and food processing plants.

The persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in food processing plants and other ecosystems reflects its ability to adapt to numerous stresses. In this study, we investigated 138 isolates from foods and food processing plants for resistance to the quaternary ammonium disinfectant benzalkonium chloride (BC) and to heavy metals (cadmium and arsenic). We also determined the prevalence of distinct cadmium resistance determinants (cadA1, cadA2, and cadA3) among cadmium-resistant isolates. Most BC-resistant isolates were resistant to cadmium as well. Arsenic resistance was encountered primarily in serotype 4b and was an attribute of most isolates of the serotype 4b epidemic clonal group ECIa. Prevalence of the known cadmium resistance determinants was serotype associated: cadA1 was more common in isolates of serotypes 1/2a and 1/2b than 4b, while cadA2 was more common in those of serotype 4b. A subset (15/77 [19%]) of the cadmium-resistant isolates lacked the known cadmium resistance determinants. Most of these isolates were of serotype 4b and were also resistant to arsenic, suggesting novel determinants that may confer resistance to both cadmium and arsenic in these serotype 4b strains. The findings may reflect previously unrecognized components of the ecological history of different serotypes and clonal groups of L. monocytogenes, including exposures to heavy metals and disinfectants.

Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.

BACKGROUND: The monitoring of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) through pharmacovigilance is vital to patient safety. Spontaneous reporting of ADRs is one method of pharmacovigilance, and in the UK this is undertaken through the Yellow Card Scheme (YCS). Yellow Card reports are submitted to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) by post, telephone or via the internet. The MHRA electronically records and reviews information submitted so that important safety issues can be detected. While previous studies have shown differences between patient and health-care professional (HCP) reports for the types of drugs and reactions reported, relatively little is known about the pharmacovigilance impact of patient reports. There have also been few studies on the views and experiences of patients/consumers on the reporting of suspected ADRs. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pharmacovigilance impact of patient reporting of ADRs by analysing reports of suspected ADRs from the UK YCS and comparing reports from patients and HCPs. To elicit the views and experiences of patients and the public about patient reporting of ADRs. DESIGN: (1) Literature review and survey of international experiences of consumer reporting of ADRs; (2) descriptive analysis of Yellow Card reports; (3) signal generation analysis of Yellow Card reports; (4) qualitative analysis of Yellow Card reports; (5) questionnaire survey of patients reporting on Yellow Cards; (6) qualitative analysis of telephone interviews with patient reporters to the scheme; (7) qualitative analysis of focus groups and usability testing of the patient YCS; and (8) national omnibus telephone survey of public awareness of the YCS. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 5180) and HCPs (n = 20,949) submitting Yellow Card reports from October 2005 to September 2007. Respondents to questionnaire survey (n = 1362). Participants at focus groups and usability testing sessions (n = 40). National omnibus telephone survey (n = 2028). SETTING: The literature review included studies in English from across the world. All other components included populations from the UK; the omnibus survey was restricted to Great Britain. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics of patient reports: types of drug and suspected ADR reported; seriousness of reports; and content of reports. The relative contributions of patient reports and of HCP reports to signal generation. Views and experiences of patient reporters. Views of members of the public about the YCS, including user-friendliness and usability of different ways of patient reporting. Public awareness of the YCS. Suggestions for improving patient reporting to the YCS. RESULTS: Compared with HCPs, patient reports to the YCS contained a higher median number of suspected ADRs per report, and described reactions in more detail. The proportions of reports categorised as 'serious' were similar; the patterns of drugs and reactions reported differed. Patient reports were richer in their descriptions of reactions than those from HCPs, and more often noted the effects of ADRs on patients' lives. Combining patient and HCP reports generated more potential signals than HCP reports alone; some potential signals in the 'HCP-only' data set were lost when combined with patient reports, but fewer than those gained; the addition of patient reports to HCP reports identified 47 new 'serious' reactions not previously included in 'Summaries of Product Characteristics'. Most patient reporters found it fairly easy to make reports, although improvements to the scheme were suggested, including greater publicity and the redesign of web- and paper-based reporting systems. Among members of the public, 8.5% were aware of the YCS in 2009. CONCLUSIONS: Patient reporting of suspected ADRs has the potential to add value to pharmacovigilance by reporting types of drugs and reactions different from those reported by HCPs; generating new potential signals; and describing suspected ADRs in enough detail to provide useful information on likely causality and impact on patients' lives. These findings suggest that further promotion of patient reporting to the YCS is justified, along with improvements to existing reporting systems. In order of priority, future work should include further investigation of (1) the pharmacovigilance impact of patient reporting in a longer-term study; (2) the optimum approach to signal generation analysis of patient and HCP reports; (3) the burden of ADRs in terms of impact on patients' lives; (4) the knowledge and attitudes of HCPs towards patient reporting of ADRs; (5) the value of using patient reports of ADRs to help other patients and HCPs who are seeking information on patient experiences of ADRs; and (6) the impact of increasing publicity and/or enhancements to reporting systems on the numbers and types of Yellow Card reports from patients. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality.

PURPOSE: There is a need for high quality evidence on the adverse effects of medical interventions to inform policy, practice and research. Methods to systematically review adverse effects have not been fully developed. We aimed to assess the current methods and reporting used by such reviews. METHODS: Survey of general medical, drug safety and pharmacology journals published in 2006. Methods including: searching, inclusion criteria, quality assessment and meta-analysis were assessed. RESULTS: Forty three systematic reviews from 2704 abstracts in 16 journals were included. The search strategy was not reported by 10 (23%) of reviews. The collection and reporting of the adverse effects from primary studies was described by 4/37 (12%) reviews and the quality of included studies was assessed by 15 (35%) of reviews. Meta-analysis on rare outcomes and handling of zero event data were inconsistent. A polarity in the standard of reporting between reviews was observed. The reporting standard we found was similar to another survey of systematic reviews. CONCLUSION: Reporting was poor with respect to searching and definition/collection of adverse effects and guidelines such as QUOROM and MOOSE could be employed by authors. Comprehensive and clear reporting should be enforced by journals. The low proportion of reviews assessing quality, and the inconsistencies observed when modelling rare event data reflect the need for empirical research to underpin methods in these areas.

Safety of nateglinide as used in general practice in England: results of a prescription-event monitoring study.

Nateglinide (Starlix((R))) is licensed for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes in patients inadequately controlled with metformin. The study objective was to monitor the safety and use of nateglinide prescribed by primary care physicians (GPs) in England, using the observational cohort technique, Prescription-Event Monitoring. Exposure data were derived from dispensed nateglinide prescriptions issued October 2001-June 2004; demographic and outcome data, from questionnaires sent to patients' GPs at least 6 months after patients' first prescription. Incidence densities (IDs; number of first reports of an event/1,000 patient-months exposure) were calculated for month 1 (ID(1)), months 2-6 (ID(2-6)); rate differences [ID(1)-ID(2-6) (+99% CI)] were examined. Cohort comprised 4,557 patients, median age 60 (IQR 51, 68 years); 2,439 (53.5%) male; 3,463 (76.0%) received nateglinide in combination with metformin. GPs reported 1,625 reasons for stopping in 1,474 (32.3%) patients and 80 events as adverse drug reactions in 66 (1.5%) patients. Events associated with starting treatment included nausea/vomiting [ID(1)-ID(2-6) 9.6 (99% CI 5.3, 13.9)], malaise/lassitude [ID(1)-ID(2-6) 6.03 (99% CI 2.2, 9.9)]. No serious hypersensitivity reactions were reported. Two pregnancies (< 0.1%) and 73 deaths (1.6%) were reported. Nateglinide appeared to be generally well tolerated when used in combination with metformin for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes.

Reactive oxygen species mediate a cellular 'memory' of high glucose stress signalling.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: A long-term 'memory' of hyperglycaemic stress, even when glycaemia is normalised, has been previously reported in endothelial cells. In this report we sought to duplicate and extend this finding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HUVECs and ARPE-19 retinal cells were incubated in 5 or in 30 mmol/l glucose for 3 weeks or subjected to 1 week of normal glucose after being exposed for 2 weeks to continuous high glucose. HUVECs were also treated in this last condition with several antioxidants. Similarly, four groups of rats were studied for 3 weeks: (1) normal rats; (2) diabetic rats not treated with insulin; (3) diabetic rats treated with insulin during the last week; and (4) diabetic rats treated with insulin plus alpha-lipoic acid in the last week. RESULTS: In human endothelial cells and ARPE-19 retinal cells in culture, as well as in the retina of diabetic rats, levels of the following markers of high glucose stress remained induced for 1 week after levels of glucose had normalised: protein kinase C-beta, NAD(P)H oxidase subunit p47phox, BCL-2-associated X protein, 3-nitrotyrosine, fibronectin, poly(ADP-ribose) Blockade of reactive species using different approaches, i.e. the mitochondrial antioxidant alpha-lipoic acid, overexpression of uncoupling protein 2, oxypurinol, apocynin and the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor PJ34, interrupted the induction both of high glucose stress markers and of the fluorescent reactive oxygen species (ROS) probe CM-H(2)DCFDA in human endothelial cells. Similar results were obtained in the retina of diabetic rats with alpha-lipoic acid added to the last week of normalised glucose. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: These results provide proof-of-principle of a ROS-mediated cellular persistence of vascular stress after glucose normalisation.

Safety profile of repaglinide as used in general practice in England: results of a prescription-event monitoring study.

Repaglinide is a prandial glucose regulator indicated for management of type 2 diabetes. This post-marketing study used the observational cohort technique of prescription-event monitoring (PEM) to monitor safety of repaglinide prescribed in primary care in England. Patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by general practitioners (GPs) between December 1998 and January 2001. Demographic and clinical event data were collected from questionnaires posted to GPs at least six months after the date of first prescription for each patient. The cohort consisted of 5731 patients [median age 60 (IQR 51-68), 49.9% male]. Event incidence densities (IDs) [no. 1st reports/1000 patient-months of exposure] were calculated for all events reported. The most frequently recorded clinical events in the first month were diarrhoea (ID(1) 10.3), malaise/lassitude (ID(1) 8.1) and nausea/vomiting (ID(1) 7.9). The most frequently reported reason for stopping was 'not effective' (647), with the most common clinical reasons being diarrhoea (60), malaise/lassitude (55) and intolerance (54). One hundred and thirteen adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported, with the most frequently specified being diarrhoea (10), abdominal pain (10) and nausea/vomiting (9). We concluded that repaglinide is generally well tolerated when used in general practice in England and did not identify any serious unrecognised adverse events.

Safety profile of orlistat: results of a prescription-event monitoring study.

INTRODUCTION: Orlistat, the first of a new class of drugs for the treatment of obesity, was launched in the UK in December 1998. The prescribing information recommends that treatment with orlistat should be discontinued after 12 weeks if the patient has not achieved a specified loss of weight. OBJECTIVE: To monitor the safety of orlistat prescribed in the primary care setting in England using prescription-event monitoring (PEM). METHODS: A postmarketing surveillance study using the observational cohort technique of PEM. Patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by primary care physicians for orlistat between December 1998 and November 1999. The outcome data were event reports obtained by sending questionnaires (green forms) to the prescribing doctor at least 6 months after the first prescription for an individual patient. Incidence densities, expressed as number of first reports of an event/1000 patient-months of exposure, were calculated. Significant differences between incidence densities (IDs) for events reported in the 1st month (ID(1)) and months 2 and 3 (ID(2-3)) of exposure were regarded as potential signals. Reasons for stopping orlistat were analysed. Follow-up information was requested for selected events and used to assess the causal association with orlistat. RESULTS: Green forms containing clinically useful information on 16 021 patients (median age 45 years (interquartile range 35-54); 80.1% females) were received. The events reported most frequently during the 1st month of treatment were 'not effective' (639; 4.0% of cohort), diarrhoea (371; 2.3%) and weight loss (230; 1.4%). Twelve clinical adverse events were identified for which ID(1) was significantly greater than ID(2-3). These included non-specific events (e.g. intolerance, malaise/lassitude, unspecified side effects), weight loss and vaginitis/vulvitis. The remaining events were gastrointestinal in nature and included diarrhoea, pain abdomen, flatulence, nausea/vomiting, rectal discharge, faecal incontinence and 'gastrointestinal unspecified' events. A similar pattern of predominately gastrointestinal events was seen for reasons for stopping and suspected adverse drug reactions. Review of selected events for causality revealed 45 events which were assessed as possibly or probably related to orlistat. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that orlistat is fairly well tolerated. The safety profile of orlistat was similar to the prescribing information and experience reported in the literature.

The negative effect of red tape on research.

PURPOSES: To describe the kind of the difficulties encountered when seeking research governance approval for a nationwide public health and genetic study-the Drug-Induced Arrhythmia Risk Evaluation study-in England. METHODS: Description of the processes followed when seeking research governance approval for the Drug-Induced Arrhythmia Risk Evaluation study-a case control study with annual follow-up of cases and controls over 5 years, set in the English National Health Service (NHS). RESULTS: The authors describe wide variations in NHS research governance approval procedures in England. CONCLUSION: NHS research governance procedures in England are impeding the process of epidemiological studies; there is the need for a centralised NHS R&D approval of studies, which is analogous to MREC for ethical approval.

Observational cohort study to monitor the use and safety of carvedilol in the treatment of heart failure in clinical practice in England--1st interim report.

AIMS: This is an interim report of a prospective observational cohort study to monitor the safety and tolerability of carvedilol in clinical practice when prescribed for heart failure in England. The utilization of carvedilol, management of adverse events in the community and the symptomatic progression of heart failure were examined. It is a non-interventional, observational cohort surveillance study using questionnaires sent to the patients' general practitioners. METHODS: The general practitioners (GPs) of the patients identified by the Prescription Pricing Authority were sent an eligibility questionnaire if the patient had been newly prescribed carvedilol between September 1999 and July 2001. Further questionnaires requesting baseline clinical information about eligible patients (carvedilol indicated for cardiac failure) and subsequent event data were sent to consenting GPs at 12 months. The questionnaires also requested specific information about initiation and supervision of treatment, including severity of heart failure and treatment withdrawal. The data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics. In addition, the incidence densities (ID) of each event (per 1000 person-months of treatment) were calculated, ranked and the difference between the ID of each event in the first (ID1) and subsequent 5 months of exposure (ID2) was tested by constructing 99% confidence intervals (CI). Selected events of clinical interest would be followed-up for further information to enable causal association with carvedilol to be assessed. RESULTS: In this interim report we have data on a cohort of 847 eligible patients for whom we have received information from the first follow-up questionnaire. The treatment of carvedilol was initiated in a majority of cases by hospital specialists (87%, n = 735), however, for most of them, further supervision of treatment was done under shared care between GPs and hospitals (70%, n = 595). More than 90% of the patients were started on carvedilol in the recommended dose range for the management of cardiac failure. Amongst the patients where NYHA grade of cardiac failure was expressed, the majority of patients treated with carvedilol had NYHA II (37%, n = 281) and III (40%, n = 297) symptoms at the start of carvedilol treatment. On treatment with carvedilol, improvement in NYHA status was reported for 43% (n = 364) of this cohort, whilst less than 2.5% (n = 20) of the patients deteriorated. The events reported with the highest ID1 were malaise/lassitude (14.6), dizziness (12.2), cardiac failure (9.7), dyspnea (9.7) and hypotension (8.5). The most common events reported as reasons for stopping carvedilol were "drug not effective", "dyspnea", "dizziness" and "lassitude". No events were identified as new signals (according to the ID1-ID2 statistic) of adverse events associated with carvedilol. There have been no events identified in this cohort that have required specific follow-up at the time of writing this paper. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the interim results show that there is effective cooperation between hospital specialists and GPs in the use of carvedilol in the management of patients with heart failure. It also shows that carvedilol was well-tolerated and that patients with mild and moderate heart failure benefit symptomatically when treated with carvedilol in routine clinical practice.

Identification and evaluation of a possible signal of exacerbation of colitis during rofecoxib treatment, using Prescription-Event Monitoring data.

BACKGROUND: Identifying previously unrecognized adverse drug reactions (signals) is an important part of post-marketing surveillance. Automated signal generation now forms part of routine surveillance of spontaneous adverse drug reactions reported to the UK Yellow Card system. The Drug Safety Research Unit (DRSU) provides an additional post-marketing drug surveillance scheme in the UK, using the non-interventional observational cohort technique of Prescription-Event Monitoring (PEM), and systematically collects data on patients who were prescribed selected newly licensed drugs in primary care clinical practice. The introduction of a new computer system in January 2000 enabled the development of an automated signal generation system to compliment the process of identification of possible safety signals in drug data collected using PEM. AIMS: To use incidence rate ratios (IRRs) as a form of signal generation in the DSRU database, with particular interest in rofecoxib, plus further evaluation of any signal(s) of interest by requesting additional information from the general practioner (GP) of each relevant case. METHODS: Crude IRRs were calculated for each event term of interest by comparing the incidence rate for each lower term event reported in rofecoxib users with the comparable incidence rate for the whole PEM database (77 drugs of various therapeutic classes) from the total person-exposure time up to 180 days after starting the drug. To investigate a possible class effect, IRRs were also calculated using a second comparator cohort including only those PEM study drugs within the same therapeutic class (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, NSAIDs) and used for similar indications. Cases arising out of potential signals were followed up for additional information. RESULTS: A potential signal of 'colitis' was identified when rofecoxib was compared with the rest of the database, IRR 5.8 (95% CI 2.7,11.3; z statistic 5.6), and when the comparator group was changed to include only the other four NSAIDs, IRR 4.3 (95% CI 1.4,14.5; z statistic 2.8). Other possible signals, compared with the rest of the database, included events deemed to be related to the underlying condition, labelled adverse events and events describing effectiveness of treatment. Further evaluation of this signal revealed that there were 11 reports of colitis (two reports for one patient) that occurred while taking rofecoxib and within 180 days of exposure. A causality assessment for these 10 patients did not confirm an association with newly developing colitis, but showed that the events were 'possible' exacerbations of pre-existing colitis during treatment with rofecoxib. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IRRs for signal generation using PEM data is worthwhile and enables time to be taken into account. Previously unrecognized adverse events require further evaluation to confirm that a possible safety signal exists. In this study, the number of patients reported to have colitis was small but compared with other drugs on the database, the incidence rate was relatively high. Follow-up revealed a possible relationship between exacerbation of pre-existing colitis and treatment with rofecoxib. Hypotheses arising from signal generation require evaluation and cannot be taken as a conclusive evidence for clinical differences in the safety profiles of drugs.