Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol ; 25(6): 1056-1061, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36911479

RESUMO

Background and Purpose: We aimed to explore the characteristics, clinical features, predictors of seizure, and associated clinical outcomes in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Methods: We enrolled patients with CVT from January 2014 to July 2020. Prospectively patients were recruited from December 2018. We analyzed predictors of seizures and associated good functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale, mRS: 0-2) using multivariable logistic regression. Results: We enrolled 153 patients with CVT in which 77 (50%) had presented with a seizure. The median age was 31 years (IQR 16-46), and the majority were men (73.2%). Focal to bilateral tonic-clonic was the most common seizure type (27%), followed by generalized seizures (22%). None of the patients had status epilepticus. Antiseizure medications (ASM) were used in 71% of patients at diagnosis, 42% having received them prophylactically. Supratentorial parenchymal involvement was seen in 72% of seizure patients compared to 38% in those without, and superior sagittal sinus was most commonly involved. Percentage of patients who achieved good clinical outcome (mRS 0-2) at 3 months did not vary significantly between both groups. The only predictor for seizures with CVT was the presence of a parenchymal lesion (OR-3.75, 95% CI 1.79-7.85), whereas seizure occurrence (OR- 12.55, 95% CI- 1.53-102.59) was associated with statistically significant risk for recurrent seizures, by multiple logistic regression analysis. Seizure occurrence was not associated with adverse functional outcomes. Conclusion: Seizures at presentation occurred in 50% of patients with CVT which was associated with a parenchymal lesion in the brain. There was no association between seizure at presentation and clinical outcome.

2.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 30(9): 105966, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34271274

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Stroke constitutes a significant public health problem in developing countries. Caregivers provide an important support system for patient care but usually lack knowledge and skill to attend their stroke patients. We assessed whether a caregiver-directed educational intervention would reduce hospital-acquired complications and improve stroke patients' outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomly assigned two Neurology inpatient wards to receive either standard care or an educational intervention. The coprimary outcomes included incidence of hospital-acquired complications and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the modified Rankin Scale and mortality at three months. RESULTS: Among 164 patients recruited, 82 received intervention, and standard care each. The mean (Standard deviation) Glasgow coma scale of patients was 11.01 (3.4), and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale was 19.17 (8.54). The incidence of complications (72 in the intervention versus 81 in the control group; p=0.56) was not different. Ten patients (12.2%) in the intervention group and 16 (19.5%) in the control group (p=0.20) died in-hospital. Twenty patients (27.8%) in the intervention and twelve (18.2%) in the control group attained modified Rankin Scale 0-2 at three months (p=0.12). The mortality at three months (20 [24.4%] in the intervention versus 25 [30.5%] in the control group) was not different (p=0.38). The intervention group had fewer complications (42 versus 68 in the control group; p=0.01) during the initial ten days of hospital stay, but adjusted analysis revealed no difference. CONCLUSION: A structured educational intervention did not reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired complications, mortality, or morbidity. However, there was a trend towards fewer complications in the initial days of hospital stay. Extended hospital stay, caregiver fatigue, and dilution of the intervention over time might be reasons for the apparent lack of effect. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-URL: http://www.ctri.nic.in. Unique identifier: CTRI/2018/11/016312.


Assuntos
Cuidadores/educação , Educação em Saúde , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Índia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...