Impact of high-resolution intracranial vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis in patients with embolic stroke of unknown source.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism responsible for stroke in patients with embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS) often remains unknown despite extensive investigations. We aimed to test whether high-resolution intracranial vessel wall MR imaging (icVWI) can add to the diagnostic yield in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ESUS were prospectively included into an ongoing registry. Patients that underwent icVWI as part of their diagnostic workup were compared to those that did not have an icVWI. Patients with icVWI positive for intracranial vulnerable plaques were than compared to those without evidence of plaque vulnerability on VWI. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients with ESUS were included and 48 of them (27%) underwent icVWI. Patients that had an icVWI scan were significantly younger, had lower rates of ischemic heart disease and prior disability as well as significantly lower stroke severity. On regression analysis the only factor that remained associated with not obtaining an icVWI scan was increasing age (Odds ratio [OR] 0.97/year, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.95-0.97). Among patients that had an icVWI scan 28 (58%) had evidence of plaque enhancement on VWI in the same distribution of the stroke and the remaining 20 studies were negative. The relative proportion of stroke presumed to be secondary to intracranial non-stenotic atheromatous disease increased from 15% in patients without icVWI scans to 58% among patients with icVWI scans (p = 0.001). On regression analysis the only factor that was associated with vulnerable plaques on icVWI was smoking (OR 11.05 95% CI 1.88-65.17). CONCLUSIONS: icVWI can add significant information relevant to stroke pathogenesis and treatment in patients with ESUS and a negative initial exhaustive diagnostic workup.

Does Malignancy Status Effect Outcomes in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke and Cancer Who Underwent Endovascular Thrombectomy?

Background Cancer is associated with an increased risk of acute ischemic stroke, including large vessel occlusions. Whether cancer status affects outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusions that undergo endovascular thrombectomy remains unknown. Methods and Results All consecutive patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusions were recruited into a prospective ongoing multicenter database, and the data were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with active cancer were compared with patients with cancer in remission. Association of cancer status with 90-day functional outcome and mortality were calculated in multivariable analyses. We identified 154 patients with cancer and large vessel occlusions that underwent endovascular thrombectomy (mean age, 74±11; 43% men; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 15). Of the included patients, 70 (46%) had a remote history of cancer or cancer in remission, and 84 (54%) had active disease. Outcome data at 90 days poststroke were available for 138 patients (90%) and was classified as favorable in 53 (38%). Patients with active cancer were younger and more often smoked but did not significantly differ from those without malignancy in other risk factors, stroke severity, stroke subtype, or procedural variables. Favorable outcome rates among patients with active cancer did not significantly differ compared with those seen in patients without active cancer, but mortality rates were significantly higher among patients with active cancer on univariate and multivariable analyses. Conclusions Our study suggests that endovascular thrombectomy is safe and efficacious in patients with history of malignancy as well as in those with active cancer at the time of stroke onset, although mortality rates are higher among patients with active cancer.

Diagnostic Yield of High-Resolution Vessel Wall Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Young Stroke Patients.

(1) Background: The mechanism responsible for stroke in patients younger than 50 often remains unknown. This study was designed to assess whether high-resolution intracranial vessel wall MR imaging (icVWI) may be instrumental in determining stroke cause. (2) Methods: Young stroke patients with and without an identified cause of stroke despite an exhaustive investigation were prospectively included. Patients who underwent icVWI were compared to those who did not. We next compared patients with and without intracranial vulnerable plaques on icVWI. (3) Results: Overall, 47 young stroke patients were identified over the span of 2 years and included in this study. Of those, 20 (42%) underwent intracranial icVWI. Cancer prevalence was higher among patients who did not have an icVWI study (19% vs. 0% p = 0.042) but there were no other significant differences between patients who had an icVWI study and those who did not have an icVWI. Among patients who had an icVWI, 11 (55%) had vulnerable plaques and the remaining nine studies were negative. Patients with positive icVWI scans had significantly higher stroke severity at admission (mean ± SD NIHSS score 5.5 ± 3.5 vs. 1.7 ± 2.3, p = 0.012). Patients with positive icVWI scans were more often treated with antiplatelets upon discharge (100% vs. 67%, p = 0.038). (4) Conclusions: icVWI can add significant information relevant to stroke pathogenesis and secondary prevention among young stroke patients with a negative exhaustive diagnostic workup.

A case report of unilateral cervical lymphadenopathy and multiple cranial neuropathies following mRNA-COVID-19 vaccination.

BACKGROUND: We report a rare case of ipsilateral multiple cranial neuropathy and ipsilateral lymphadenopathy following mRNA-COVID-19 vaccination. CASE PRESENTATION: A 41-year-old male visited our emergency room complaining of dysphagia and hoarseness that started a week after receiving COVID19 mRNA vaccination (in his right arm). During his hospitalization, he also complained of right side hearing loss and diplopia. Neurological examination depicted a right IV nerve palsy, ipsilateral facial paresthesia and peripheral facial paresis. Otorinolaryngological examination revealed right vocal cord paralysis. A brain magnetic resonance imaging showed enhancement of the right VII and VIII cranial nerves in the auditory canal. The lumbar puncture revealed increased protein concentration and lymphocytic pleocytosis in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Additionally, a neck computed tomography (CT) scan showed a swollen right supraclavicular lymph node. We hypothesize that the ipsilateral cranial neuropathies of IV, VI, VII, VIII and X, associated with cervical lymphadenopathy, was possible caused by a post-vaccination immune-mediated reaction. The patient was treated with a 5-day course of intravenous methylprednisolone (1000 mg/day), and a gradual improvement was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Similarly, to other vaccines, it is possibly that also mRNA vaccines may act as triggers of non-specific autoimmune neurological syndromes.